It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Concerns justified in comparison to what?
Originally posted by FredT
At anyrate, SARS was real and people died, and the potential was huge. Bird flu is real and people have died and its showing signs of human to human transmission, so the concerns are well justified IMHO.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
How many people died during the flu pandemic in, when was it, 1913?
Originally posted by parrhesia
It just makes you wonder why there's a focus on one disease or another, while there's always something lingering in the background that has the potential to wreak more havoc over the long term and gets no attention.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The Spanish Flu Pandemic, also known as the Great Influenza Pandemic, the 1918 Flu Epidemic, and La Grippe, was an unusually severe and deadly strain of influenza, a viral infectious disease, that killed some 25 million to 50 million people worldwide in 1918 and 1919. It is thought to have been one of the most deadly pandemics so far in human history.
The nations of the Allied side of World War I frequently called it the "Spanish Flu." This was mainly because the pandemic received greater press attention in Spain than in the rest of the world, because Spain was not involved in the war and there was no wartime censorship. In Spain it was called "The French Flu". Spain did have one of the worst early outbreaks of the disease, with some 8 million people infected in May 1918. It was also known as "only the flu" or "the grippe" by public health officials seeking to prevent panic.