O' Rhesus Negative Blood/ First Humans, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 14-9-2005 @ 06:56 AM by redize
Hi all.

I've posted before about my illness; Hypokalaemic Periodic Paralysis, and decided to look on the net to see if it has anything to do with the blood.

Previous thread (if interested):

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Anyway, as I mentioned I was looking for information about blood and found a pretty strange site that had some odd info to offer.

www.anomalog.com...

Being O' Rhesus Negative myself I found it quite interesting.

Could it be possible that people with this blood group are descendants from the "First" humans?
Either way, believe it or not, it's still a pretty interesting read.

Any thoughts?



I just found another site about the Rhesus Negative Blood type but this one has something to do with reptillians. I know a lot of you laugh at the reptillian theory, but just give it a look. It certainly gets you thinking.

www.reptilianagenda.com...

This is probably a dumb question but does anyone believe this information to be credible?

[edit on 14/9/2005 by redize]


reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 07:54 AM by redize
Originally posted by DDay
Redize, who wrote that bloodgroup article? Is there more info regarding it?


I'm not sure who wrote that article but I went to the homepage and found this:

www.anomalog.com...

About halfway down the page it goes blank, but if you highlight it all you can see what is written???? Don't know why they've done this.

My mum just said that she had to have the same shot's during her pregnancy and when I was born. I came out with O' rh neg the same as my mum, so maybe your child has the same blood group.

They say we are the anomolies consisting of only 7% give or take of worldwide population and yet the RH positives carry a monkey protein
That is funny We're not related to monkeys! Just kidding.
Maybe we are special, i've definitely felt like i'm not part of the populace before. Maybe we do carry the original bloodline.

Sorry for waffling, I just find this stuff pretty interesting!

[edit on 14/9/2005 by redize]



reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 08:59 AM by DDay
Here is some more info for your reading pleasure.
www.greatdreams.com...

It's a little more comprehensive.

Thanks for bringing this up again. I have visited some threads about this a while ago and it was very thought provoking then so I am glad I am revisiting this now.

Makes you go HMMM...
Do any of you share the similarites of traits stated in the article?

I have green eyes, blonde hair but with red undertones that drive me crazy.

very low blood pressure 90/68 commonly


reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 10:47 AM by redize
I just found this site which is a little more informative regarding blood types:

www.absoluteastronomy.com...

(quote) Type O people have red blood cells with neither antigen, but produce antibodies against both types of antigens. Because of this arrangement, type O can be safely given to any person with any ABO blood type. Hence, a person with type O blood is said to be a "universal donor" but can only receive blood from the corresponding O type people shown in the blood compatibility table below. Thus, for example, an O-negative person can only receive blood from another O-negative person. (/quote)

After reading the above statement I find myself a bit baffled.
Many years ago, I decided I should start giving blood, so I went to my nearest donor centre to apply. They did a few tests on my blood and then told me that being O' rhesus negative meant that I couldn't donate?!?

I thought that was a bit odd so consulted my doctor and he agreed. I forget most of what he said then, but he said that people with O' neg could not donate blood.

Is it possible my doctor got it wrong somehow?? I've always believed since then that i'm not suitable as a donor.

I think i'm going to have to do a bit more research on blood types and their relation to genetics. I find this stuff awesome to think about.

p.s: I don't know why "astronomy" is in the link above??

[edit on 14/9/2005 by redize]


reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 05:33 PM by LordBucket
redize:
>If we are all the same species, then why do the
>blood types react the way they do?!?

Tissue rejection is a major problem with organ transplants. I think it's reasonable that the absense or presence of any particular protein in blood would be sufficient difference to trigger an immune system response. It happens not to for many combinations of blood composition, but it does here. If you want to say that RH- is a result of human-alien hybridization or genetic manipulation, ok...but it's certainly not neccesary to explain things. Random mutation, or mutation induced by circumstances of the war would make convincing explanations as well.

Again...my question is what does that protein do? So far as I know, people with RH- blood don't have any particular health problems...so apparantly missing that protein isn't causing any major problems. I'm not ready to thrown mine away, but depending on y our perspective of evolution...it might be something to the effect of an evolutionary dropping of something no longer useful.

Again...assuming that the RH- type genuinely didn't exist prior to 1940, as opposed to it having simply gone unnoticed...my question is why exactly did the entire population have a blood protein that apparantly doesn't do anything useful? Evolutionary leftover? Like a tailbone?

FredT:
>It does not use amonia, but it does produce it. If levels get to
>high the patient can be comatose from high levels. The liver
>has the primary job of eliminating it.

Ok. Do RH- people have different liver function? Are they better able to handle an excess of ammonia?

I guess we don't know. I'll say again that I think the simplest answer is that RH- blood is simply a mutation that happens only to be mildly dysfunctional.

If anyone wants to say it's the result of hybridization or genetic manipulation...ok, that's great. But I still want to know want that protein does in the general population, and what consequences are of the lack of it. In a vague, general, uninformed sort of way...having more proteins sounds like a good thing to me...but that might not be how it is.

Does anyone know if any animals share that particular protein? It might be useful to have something to compare to.

>nukunuku

Nuku Nuku??? ^_^
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



First Heartless Man - You Don\'t Really Need A Heart or A Pulse
  Posted 7 days ago with 51 member flags
Doctor Uses Coconut Oil to Reverse Husband\'s Alzheimer\'s Disease
  Posted 12 days ago with 28 member flags
A brief look at water fluoridation and the insanity of it
  Posted 10 days ago with 28 member flags
Brains of Addicts Are Inherently Abnormal
  Posted 6 days ago with 20 member flags
FDA say body is a drug and has the right to regulate it!
  Posted 9 days ago with 18 member flags
MPD/DID and Quantum Psychiatry
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 186 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 11 hours ago, 102 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 71 replies