Adam, only 6,000 yrs old?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-8-2005 @ 06:56 AM by FallenFromTheTree
I think he's talking about the article titled "Terrestrial Evidence of a Nuclear Catastrophe in Paleoindian Times"

www.centerfirstamericans.com...

Whilie visiting centerfirstamericans.com

also found this..........

www.centerfirstamericans.com...

Exactly how old are the soils at the Topper site? Al Goodyear isn't sure yet. Materials recovered from the top of the pre-Clovis level date to 15,000-16,000 calendar years old--and there appear to be artifacts a meter below that! "We may be able to add a few thousand years to that," says Dr. Goodyear with obvious restraint, "since there are artifact-bearing sediments below the 16,000-year-old zone."

In the pre-Clovis level he has recovered stone flakes and what appear to be tools. According to one expert in microscopy, they show signs of use wear. And they definitely aren't Clovis. As far as Goodyear and his colleagues can tell, they're pre-Clovis and they're man-made.

[edit on 30-8-2005 by FallenFromTheTree]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 16 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags
Evolution. Not a theory, but a fact!
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Evolutionary theory: Gaps and not yet understood phenonemon
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags