reply to post by LaBTop
There was EVIDENCE of much higher radiation levels at the Pentagon and the WTC :
The Radalert 50 is primarily a gamma ray detector and "detects only 7 percent of the beta radiation and even less of the [very short lived]
alpha." This suggests that actual radiation levels may have been significantly higher than those detected by the doctor's Geiger counter.
"The question is, why?" Folkers said. If the radiation came from the explosion and fire at the Pentagon, it most likely did not come from a Boeing
757, which is the type of aircraft that allegedly hit the building. --- "Boeing has never used DU on either the 757 or the 767, and we no longer use
it on the 747," Leslie M. Nichols, product spokesperson for Boeing's 767, told AFP.
The same Radalert 50's were used around the Pentagon, see my 2005 posts about it in this thread.
When you combine these actual readings recorded by an apparatus that was not constructed to significantly record alpha and beta radiation, but mainly
gamma radiation, with the fact that these detectors thus missed the bulk of the factual alpha and beta radiation, missing 93% of beta, and 99% of the
present alpha radiation, it becomes obviously clear that, when low level radiation would have been emanated during micro-nuclear-devices utilization
as proposed by Jeff Prager on 9/11, their radiation levels would have been nearly completely missed in the first days, and would have been completely
lost the next Tuesday.
At the Pentagon and at the WTC.
Only (radioactive) dust sampling such as the USGS did in the first few days in New York, preserved those radiation levels, as I posted about already
in 2005, and expressed my worries about it.
Those results have been analyzed now meticulously by Jeff Prager, and seem to prove my former 2005, and his recent 2012 thesis of use of micro-nuclear
devices on 9/11.
And the realization of that sickening feeling is difficult to suppress, we all try to neglect in a somewhat desperate manner, what is so obviously
evidenced by Jeff Prager.
I see up till now, no faulty reasoning in his 24 pages I linked to......
And the even more sickening conclusion should be, that the facts Jeff showed us, lead us to accepting the notion, that one or more governments are
using for some time now, micro nuclear explosives on us, the global population.
Or can YOU refute Jeff's 24 pages long arguments?
I hope you, or someone else can, otherwise.........
I expect you understand that these, every time again launched, counter arguments about terrible radiation levels (gamma) after use of conventional
nuclear devices, are not valid when having read Jeff's 24 pages arguments, based on and combined with those early USGS reports regarding their 9/11
His evidence points at very low level radiation emitting nuclear devices.