It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by brimstone735
I predict that someone, soon, in this very thread, will mention Sandy Berger as a way to muddy the waters and absolve Karl Rove of wrong doing.
Originally posted by slank
"I see that it will be found that no crime was commited, because the leak was unintentional"
"It was a tiny, tiny, little boo boo"
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Why would anyone want to compare Karl Rove's actions here to those of a criminal?
Originally posted by brimstone735
I predict that someone, soon, in this very thread, will mention Sandy Berger as a way to muddy the waters and absolve Karl Rove of wrong doing.
Ya know if all these GOP dittoheads (and they call us liberals knee jerk yeah right) had actually been raised to be decent and truly moral instead of being raised as conservatives they would realize that there are no apples and oranges comparisons. To say that just because Sandy Berger (or Bill Clinton or whoever) did something illegal, that it makes it alright if they do so, is not only faulty logic it is a faulty morality. And to say that Karl Rove didn't know is not only bull# it is evasive. Rove has been around the halls of power long enough now to have known what he was doing, and after all this time, if he really didn't know then he doesn't deserve to be there at all. If any of us tried this defense the courts would tell us ignorance of the law is no excuse and that should apply doubly to those involved in government.
Originally posted by grover
Originally posted by brimstone735
I predict that someone, soon, in this very thread, will mention Sandy Berger as a way to muddy the waters and absolve Karl Rove of wrong doing.
Ya know if all these GOP dittoheads (and they call us liberals knee jerk yeah right) had actually been raised to be decent and truly moral instead of being raised as conservatives they would realize that there are no apples and oranges comparisons. To say that just because Sandy Berger (or Bill Clinton or whoever) did something illegal, that it makes it alright if they do so, is not only faulty logic it is a faulty morality. And to say that Karl Rove didn't know is not only bull# it is evasive. Rove has been around the halls of power long enough now to have known what he was doing, and after all this time, if he really didn't know then he doesn't deserve to be there at all. If any of us tried this defense the courts would tell us ignorance of the law is no excuse and that should apply doubly to those involved in government.
Originally posted by intrepid
Yet another canned response: This is the News forum, please don't circumvent the censors.
How did Rove know? Who told HIM?