It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Two reasons:
1) There will be no impeachment proceedings brought against Bush.
2) Being a Canadian that you are, any attempt to impeach Bush will prove futile. You'd be better off waiting for Chirac to get voted out of office so that you can then advocate that he move to Montreal and run for the head of government there. I'm certain he would win....
Sadaam funded Palestinian terrorists. Sadaam was a major reason Iran armed itself. Sadaam destablized the Middle East. With Sadaam still in power, there would be no hope of a democratic Iran, a democratic Palestine, Syria withdrawing from Lebanon, Saudi Arabia lowering it's rhetoric, and overall peace in the middle east. Logically, it can't be done.
Look at the Axis of Evil Speech. First time he ever mentioned Iraq. He mentions WMD, but the focus is that we can no longer afford nations that want to destroy the US to exist. And wasn't their a Uranium African importation that proved to be true, and you are ignoring?Here's the linkj.
I wrote: There are 1000 times more terrorists in Iraq NOW then there were under Saddam Hussein.
You replied: Yeah, and these were well to do, middle class cab drivers, construction workers and electricians that suddenly "turned terrorists" since the US invaded. It's our fault, all the time.
Don't you think it has something to do with Sadaam's former army that turned to terrorist tactics instead of facing war crimes that they know they would be executed for?
And also take in account that we have brought the fight to the enemy. They're hasn't been one terrorist attack on the US homeland. Before you had 9/11, the Cole, the milenium bomber, the embassy bombings and a ton of others.
800 dead Iraqi civilians since the "free election".
That's really cute how you put in quotes free election. I love how you mock millions of people that stood up to death threats to vote for the first time. And at the same time, you try to discredit the results just for your own selfish reasons because a minority Sunni party lost their tyrannical power to a majority. Very classy of you.
And 800 dead is nothing in a country the size of Iraq. I can make the US seem like a hell hole by focusing on downtown Detroit or LA.
SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS NON-SECULAR!!!!! IRAQ HAD A NON-SECULAR GOVERNMENT!!!!! READ SOMETHING!!!
I understand. But he funded terrorists. His sole existence was to destroy the US. He sent one of his security agents to blow up the WTC in 1993. He would have no qualms about selling a WMD to Osama bin Laden. The Taliban almost took us out with far less money, resources and infrastructure than Sadaam did. Didn't 9/11 teach you something? Are we to just sit down, bury our heads in the sand, and just hope he doesn't decide to attack us?
Palestine held free elections. Libya disarmed. Syria withdrew from Lebanon. Saudi Arabia is fighting al Qaeda. Iran has all the pressure to allow UN Inspectors and has no more excuses.
Things sound good to me.
Originally posted by lukethedrifter
Another thing for you guys to consider is that if any of this was true, don't you think the people who oppose the President would have taken him out already?
Originally posted by lukethedrifter
?! Islamic terror and Saddam were not allies. Osama wanted Saddam as dead as Bush did.
Sadaam funded Palestinian terrorists. Sadaam was a major reason Iran armed itself. Sadaam destablized the Middle East. With Sadaam still in power, there would be no hope of a democratic Iran, a democratic Palestine, Syria withdrawing from Lebanon, Saudi Arabia lowering it's rhetoric, and overall peace in the middle east. Logically, it can't be done. And imagine what would happen 10 years from now when Sadaam dies and his sons gain power.
Originally posted by lukethedrifter
I understand. But he funded terrorists. His sole existence was to destroy the US.
Originally posted by deltaboy
do u have ani proof that the chemical weapons were used in Falluja?
Originally posted by deltaboy
i dont think Bush ever authorize the use of torture in Iraq.
Originally posted by deltaboy
also people like Condi and Bush would not allow 9/11 to happened if they actually knew it was gonna happened. u know how bureacracy is, information sharing is just slow and government agencies dont like to share with each other, dont blame on Bush for dat.
Originally posted by deltaboy
massive voter suppression? if i remember correctly Senator Kerry decided to concede the election.
Originally posted by deltaboy
cover up Mossad's involvement of 9/11? sorry but i dont believe Jews like to commit martyr since they dont believe in Islam and that it leads to the wrong paradise thanks to their different religion.
Originally posted by deltaboy
and the supression of protestors, ususually they be committing violence and destroy public property thats why they go to jail, the other non-violent protestors can do wat they want to do as long it doesnt harm others.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
hey jakomo, can you show evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any of the charges are true ? If they had merit, wouldn't the democrats try to return the favor for what happened to bubba ?
Originally posted by Toelint
As for whether or not Bush&Co knew about 9/11, I'd like to ask...were any of the aforementioned people booked on any of flights that crashed on that day? Is it considered odd by anyone else that the only people "warned" not to fly just happen to be the biggest Lib on the West Coast, a Muslim novelist, and the biggest anti-american Jew in Israel?
Originally posted by Army
Is this all you conspiracy theorists can muster? Half-baked fantasy? I was there, and lived it. What do you have?
Originally posted by heelstone
You wound up fighting for the biggest and most delusional conspiracy theorist of them all. George Bush and his WMD fantasies. Don't you feel at least a little upset that you were led into war by a nut who imagined things which did not exist?
Originally posted by Jakomo
9) Covering up the involvement of Mossad in 9/11. The fellow that secreted these spies and explosives experts out of country and back into Israel , Michael Chertoff, was promoted from Criminal Division of the Justice Dept to lead the Dept. of Homeland Security.!
[edit on 3-6-2005 by Jakomo]
Source
In November of 2001, 6 more suspicious Israelis were detained in an unspecified mid-eastern state. They had in their possession box cutters, oil pipeline plans, and nuclear power plant plans. (6) The local police called in the Feds and Immigration officials took over the scene and released the men without calling the FBI. The Jerusalem Post, the Miami Herald, (7) and the Times of London (8) all carried this amazing story and all revealed how furious FBI officials were that these terror suspects with nuclear power plant plans were allowed to go free. Of course, the corruption riddled FBI would only have caved into Zionist pressure from the Justice Department’s Criminal Division boss, Michael Chertoff, and also from the ADL’s “partner”, FBI boss Robert Mueller - who would no doubt have found a way to eventually release those Israeli terror suspects too.
Source
Top U.S. Army analysts believe Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, is "ruthless and cunning," "a wildcard" that "has [the] capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
Originally posted by Army
Really? What part of 11 of 17 UN resolutions allowing and promising military action against Saddam for over 12 years don't you get? What part of Saddam had, and used, chemical warfare against his own people and Iran, then denied he ever had any, then failed to comply with their destruction after he DID admit to having them, don't you get? What part of Saddam supporting palestinian violence, Syrian occupation, Indonesian terrorism support, and continued violence and harrasement of Kuwait, don't you get?
GW was not alone in agreeing with the intelligence reports he received...Klinton also read and acted on those very same intell reports. Hell, nearly all the liberal leadership of the US agreed that military action against Iraq was needed up to, and after, 9/11. GW used 16 words in his speech to point out the danger of Saddam's WMD projects. How can all you nut jobs be so fixated on 16 words of a speech outlining the very same reasons that that Klinton acted on, and the Democrats agreed with, as some wild outlandish story concocted by GW and GW alone?
You dolts call the President a fool, liar, incompetant, stupid, and a cowboy all in one breath...then claim this vast conspiracy to delude the world was all his own doing.
C'mon, either he is stupid, or the most intelligent and cunning man on earth. Make up your mind already, one or the other.
Bring on the accusations and conspiracy theories, but better bring SOLID PROOF too, or the right thinking people out there will continue to think of you as no better than last night's, dinner as it swirls into the sewer.
Again...I was there. I witnessed no criminal activity, heard of no criminal activity, and was overwhelmed at the acceptence of the principles of Democracy that the Iraqi's are gladly embracing.....just like Mr. Bush said.......and YOU didn't.
[edit on 12-6-2005 by Army]
Originally posted by Army
I was in Fallujah for the 2nd push in October 2004. We based on the southern outskirts prior to engagement. On day 3, we were in control of the hospital where nearly all the wounded and injured were received for triage and evac to Anaconda. After 3 weeks, my squad relocated back to Anaconda, as logistics was, by then, easily handled by the Marines and ING.
At no time did I see or witness any direct chemical burns (other than normal explosive damage and residue) on anyone or any creature. No Soldier or Marine carried any MOPP gear, other than the occasional pro-mask, with them into the city. The chem-war story/myth is a lie.
Originally posted by Army
85% of all wounded are brought through Anaconda for evaluation, surgery, or evac to Germany. I ga-ron-tee that any word about chemical agents would have swept the base like a panicked wildfire.......it didn't happen.
Originally posted by Army
Is this all you conspiracy theorists can muster? Half-baked fantasy? I was there, and lived it. What do you have?
Originally posted by Army
Originally posted by heelstone
You wound up fighting for the biggest and most delusional conspiracy theorist of them all. George Bush and his WMD fantasies. Don't you feel at least a little upset that you were led into war by a nut who imagined things which did not exist?
Really? What part of 11 of 17 UN resolutions allowing and promising military action against Saddam for over 12 years don't you get? What part of Saddam had, and used, chemical warfare against his own people and Iran, then denied he ever had any, then failed to comply with their destruction after he DID admit to having them, don't you get? What part of Saddam supporting palestinian violence, Syrian occupation, Indonesian terrorism support, and continued violence and harrasement of Kuwait, don't you get?
3) The decision by Bush to dig up dirt on UN diplomats when the General Assembly was considering his ill-fated war resolution
12) Conspiring with Ken Lay to rip-off the the people of California by creating false energy shortages,thus creating the causus belli for charging energy consumers illegal, confiscatory rates.