It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Exploit the Rift
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Wednesday 25 May 2005
Members of the Republican Party's political action corps pride themselves on discipline and adherence to the line. Most of the time they are very good at this, which explains to a degree their ascendancy of late. All of a sudden, however, that discipline has started to crack, and the outlines of a full-fledged civil war within the ranks of the GOP are beginning to become manifestly clear.
The public rift started several weeks ago, when Majority leaders Frist and DeLay dragged the rest of the party along on the demented sleigh-ride that was the Schiavo affair. Messrs. Frist and DeLay assumed, wrongly, that the American people would happily accept the idea that Congressmen should serve as mother, father, husband, wife, doctor and priest on matters of life and death as they pertain to medical decisions. When some 80% of the public rejected this concept out of hand, according to every poll, the cracks began to publicly appear.
This actually started as a private rift back in November. The 'movement conservatives' - read: fundamentalist evangelical activist Christian base of the GOP - believed they were the ones who single-handedly delivered electoral victory to Bush in the last election, and were set upon being paid back for their efforts. This expected payback amounted to the assumption that the GOP majority in Congress would take up all the issues dear to the movement conservative heart.
The problem arose when a good number of the old-school conservatives within the GOP decided they didn't really want the fundamentalists driving the bus. These old-school conservatives were likewise developing a significant disgust for the so-called leadership of the neo-conservatives in the White House and Pentagon, who had led the party into the bottomless blood-well of Iraq.
www.truthout.org...
Originally posted by brimstone735
How does one think long term national planning, when they believe Jesus is coming back to spirit everyone away.
Originally posted by xpert11
Much will depend on who the Republicans choose for the 2008 race at this stage it looks like the Republican party has sold its soul to a bunch of regliouse nuts.
Unless the Republicans can claim there party back they risk losing votes to the Libertarians and handing the election to the Dems on a platter.
The millon dollar question is who can take the Republican party back?
Is it possible that the Republican party is dyeing?
Reagan was a great prez but was he a Republican ?
I will watch with the next few years with great interest to see what emerges from the American right.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Don't be surprised if good ole Dick Cheney decides to run!
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Some people don't know this; but, Reagan began his political life as a liberal Democrat. He was a big FDR guy, as most were.
Originally posted by xpert11
I think Reagan was a moderate Democrat he later said the Democrat party deserted him. I think his wife Nancy and his childhood had a big influnce on his move to the political right. But alas Im getting off topic pass the popcorn.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
There's a civil war brewing in the ranks of the GOP. It has been brewing for quite some time, but the cracks are starting to show now.
You basically have two groups: Old-school, Paleo-Conservatives & moderates and you have the movement Republicans (religious fundamentalists) & Neo Cons.
Something strange is happening, though. The Old-schoolers have put their ears on and are exercising their God-given common sense. They've heard the public and its disdain for so many of the assinine policies being pushed by Bush and his extremist faction.
They're finally, publicly breaking ranks with the corrupt GOP leadership and putting the good of the nation before party loyalties. What a slap in the face to the ethically challenged Tom DeLay and political opportunist and presidential wanna-be Bill Frist.
Bush, Frist and DeLay have seriously and disasterously overreached on a number of issues. It's been one thing after the next. Iraq, the Terri Shiavo case, the "nuclear option" (filibuster fight), the Bolton affair, social security, the stem-cell debate. Only a vengeful, ruthless fringe group in this country actually supports this ongoing madness the president is promoting.
It's also time to make it clear to those fanatic pseudo-Republicans that the United States will not tolerate being ruled by a Taliban-like fundamentalist government!
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Fiscal conservatism is gone, small government is gone, and only the grass roots seem to remember that illegal immigration is both a winning issue (defeated only by activist judges in most cases) and a vital policy issue.
But the breadth of Mr. McCain's proposal, and its potential to split his party, underscores the challenge of getting it enacted. It would invest more in border security through technology such as unmanned aerial vehicles, while creating an 'essential worker' H-5A visa for immigrants willing to fill low-skilled jobs that Americans won't take. Applicants would have to show that a job is waiting for them, pay a $500 fee, and clear security and medical checks.
Undocumented workers already here could register for a temporary H-5B visa that would be good for as long as six years. To qualify for permanent legal status, they would have to clear security checks, pay back taxes and a $2,000 fee, and learn English. Hospitals caring for illegal immigrants would be eligible for federal reimbursement.
'This is not an amnesty bill,' Mr. McCain declared on the Senate floor as he introduced the legislation. more from the WSJ 5/17/05
Originally posted by lmgnyc
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Fiscal conservatism is gone, small government is gone, and only the grass roots seem to remember that illegal immigration is both a winning issue (defeated only by activist judges in most cases) and a vital policy issue.
Activist judges? Think again. Immigration is another issue that divides the Republican party. There are those traditional corporate conservatives, like Bush and McCain, that favor an approach that allows business the ability to continue to access a cheaper workforce by sponsoring 'guest-worker' or 'essential-worker' H-5B visas and continuing some federally-funded welfare programs.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
the Republican party has lost its identity. They aren't having a civil war over who they are- they uniformly do not know who they are beyond the grass roots.