It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
But the same cannot be true in the case of the J-6, J-7, J-8, J-10, FC-1, H-5, H-6 which were all reverse engineered from other airplanes after obtaining the other plane, disecting the same and making your own plane or by buying some existing design with all of the R&D on it completed.
As a matter of choice, i dislike its unstable airframe too
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
All nice to learn, but the fact of the matter is that there is a distinct difference between stealth and manueverability.
The Su-37 Flanker and the F/A-22 Raptor.
Believed to be the world's two most powerful aircraft. It's true that the Raptor is way more advanced than the Flanker stealth wise, and can easily take out a flanker, but what alot of people seem to misunderstand, is the fact that if the Raptor's stealth fails for whatever reason, and it's in a dogfight with a Flanker(which by the way Raptor's are to not fall into dogfights, First sight, first kill basis), the flanker would most definetly win the dogfight.
The Flanker is capable of 3 dimensional TVC, where as the Raptor is only capable of 2D. I believe that the Raptor sacrifices a large part of its manueverability for stealth, and I believe it's for the better, this way the Raptor will always squeeze off the first shot, and will win the fight without the Flanker even seeing what's happening.
But, I think what Richard was trying to get at, is it's not the Raptor that will fall behind the times, is that the more inferior aircraft, like the Flanker, Super flanker, and Berkrut, will advance in radar technology, they will be able to see to the Raptor, so the Raptor in essence, will be completely useless with it's stealth, so in 5-10 years, there may possibly be Radar that can counter Stealth, and you can't go back and change the entire design of the Raptor's stealth so that it has a lower cross-section, the Raptor is only open to very limited improvement, so upgrades will be difficult. The Raptor may only reign dominant for a decade or so. But in level of technology, it will reign dominant for 2 decades. However there will always be a Radar that is built to counter the Raptor, and with that in place, the Raptor is virtually useless.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
But the same cannot be true in the case of the J-6, J-7, J-8, J-10, FC-1, H-5, H-6 which were all reverse engineered from other airplanes after obtaining the other plane, disecting the same and making your own plane or by buying some existing design with all of the R&D on it completed.
Russian Mikoyan Aero-Science Production Group (MASPG) providing assistance in some design work as well as its RD-93 turbofan engine to power the aircraft.
As part of my research on strategic affairs I frequent numerous web sites that focus on India's emergence as a military power. The enthusiasm expressed on most such forums by young Indians for Defense Research Projects managed by the DRDO, such as the LCA, Arjun MBT and the Brahmos is gratifying. Unfortunately, there is no similar enthusiasm for DRDO products within the defense forces. The IAF is not as thrilled as the young people on these forums about the proposed induction of the LCA. Clearly, there is a serious disconnect and I will attempt to address in these columns in the coming days.
Introduction
A Marut of 31 Sqn IAF at the AF Museum, PalamThe recent news, curiously enough reported only by ¹Calcutta telegraph to best of my knowlede, that the Kaveri engine being built to power the Tejas LCA had failed in high altitude simulation test on the ground was a disappointment. However, it was not a surprise. Bangalore based Gas Turbine and Research Organization, GTRE, has in the past failed to deliver on the HJE-2500 engine for the Kiran jet trainer or come up with anything credible when the Maruts languished for want of a suitable engine during the 70s. Its ability to come up with a GE F404 replacement was suspect at the very best, more likely quixotic.
²Air Chief Marshal S. Krishnaswamy on October 6 acknowledged the setback in Kaveri development when he recommended a mid-term quality review of the Kaveri aero-engine
As part of my research on strategic affairs I frequent numerous web sites that focus on India's emergence as a military power. The enthusiasm expressed on most such forums by young Indians for Defense Research Projects managed by the DRDO, such as the LCA, Arjun MBT and the Brahmos is gratifying. Unfortunately, there is no similar enthusiasm for DRDO products within the defense forces. The IAF is not as thrilled as the young people on these forums about the proposed induction of the LCA. Clearly, there is a serious disconnect and I will attempt to address in these columns in the coming days.
the mig-33 was never even a prototype. it was just a design concept. It was just a rumour about the FC-1 being designed from mig-33. because of mig design help.
Originally posted by W4rl0rD
If you mean illegally copied or reverse engineered, none of them make the cut. The J-6 and J-7 are just MiG-19s and MiG-21s made in China with Chinese parts.
Originally posted by waynos
Well, I think that the possibility of opening the doors to launch a missile being a potential problem would have been at the forefront of the designers minds, seeing how exacting the specification was in the first place and that, consequently, a great deal of money and effort was expended in making sure that it wasn't a problem at all.
The Raptor may eventually prove to have a fatal flaw of some kind, unfortunately this sort of thing is unpredictable, but if it has it wont be something so obvious that a load of plane buffs on a messageboard could spot it ahead of Lockheed and the USAF.