It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
They aren't afraid of death. The mullahs have said it would be their religious duty to use a nuke against Israel so if it goes bad for them, they just nuke Israel and go to heaven to their 72 virgins, no big whoop.
Originally posted by sal88
well an attack/invasion of Iran probably won't be a good idea. Because they will obviously attack back(loads), and it may increase terrorism a lot more, although maybe the Iranians won't stoop to that level, being that they are proud people (apparently). Maybe even it will start a war between the Muslim world and USA, and for as good a reason as ever, which the USA will take severe beats for.
Also, if they do want to nuke USA or Israel, then they will probably be nuked back, so why would they?
I'll be honest, i have not read the entire article, but i get the gist of it. Iran apparently funds terrorism, of which is debatable as to whether it is an outrage or not, seeing as Israel isn't too friendly towards Palestine. What about the Project for a New American Century? Don't they want to take over the world? If i wanted to do that i wouldn't have a problem with demonising countries i want to take over, maybe all these claims are exaggertated? That Fox news report on Iran's nuclear ambitions was an absolute disgrace, it was presented like hollywood first of all. But the most ridiculous thing was when they said, here is a video of a woman being stoned to death in Iran, God knows where or when it was from. Then they said, do we really want a country who treats people like this in possession of nuclear weapons? what a joke! who said that the stoning was state sponsered?
Sorry if that is a bit too conspiracy, but this site is under the conspiracy category on Yahoo!
Is he (Negroponte) in Court now, being charged at? Like Slobodan Milosevic?
I dont think so. He's got some better work to do - as appointed by Bush himself.
On February 17, 2005, President George W. Bush named Negroponte as the first Director of National Intelligence, a position created due to recommendations made by the 9/11 Commission completed late in 2004. On April 21, 2005, John Negroponte was confirmed by a vote of 98 to 2 in the Senate, and subsequently sworn in as the Director of National Intelligence.
Thats what happens to War Criminals in USA - they get promoted to National Intelligence Directors.
Nice.
[edit on 6/5/05 by Souljah]
Originally posted by Siroos
I don't think you're getting what Xmotex is trying to get across to you, which is that Iran would not do such a thing knowing that the U.S. has the ability to annihilate Iran and most probably would do so if Iran would just for the joy of it decide to nuke the oil-fields. ...................Where do you get your ideas from? What have you been reading or watching? Corsi, huh? Yeah, Corsi is good if you like science fiction and if you enjoy being lied to.
Originally posted by Siroos
You're entirely right in everything you said! Iran abolished stoning almost 3 years ago
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Siroos
I don't think you're getting what Xmotex is trying to get across to you, which is that Iran would not do such a thing knowing that the U.S. has the ability to annihilate Iran and most probably would do so if Iran would just for the joy of it decide to nuke the oil-fields. ...................Where do you get your ideas from? What have you been reading or watching? Corsi, huh? Yeah, Corsi is good if you like science fiction and if you enjoy being lied to.
No, I actually don't think Iran would launch an outright nuclear attack against the U.S. I think they would most likely do everything possible to help some fools that actually do believe the 72 virgins BS sneak a nuclear weapon into the U.S. so they could pretend, cowardly-like, that they had nothing to do with it.
[edit on 5/6/2005 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by centurion1211
What, nothing more from Siroos on this thread?
Wait! I see that you are currently busy bashing the U.S. and defending Iran (while trying not to hyperventilate, no doubt) on another thread. I'll be patient.
Originally posted by Kriz_4
Then you are showing your lack of knowledge on the matter and quite frankly demonstrating your ignorance on this subject matter. Reading a variety of sources could help you with this.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Bottom line here is that the lot of you can incessantly bash the U.S., but somebody gives you a taste of your own medicine regarding Iran, and you all just flip out. We have a saying: "Don't dish it out if you can't take it yourself".
Meditate on that one for awhile ...
[edit on 5/6/2005 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Kriz_4
Then you are showing your lack of knowledge on the matter and quite frankly demonstrating your ignorance on this subject matter. Reading a variety of sources could help you with this.
Best to check in the mirror before you say things like that Kriz. As it turns out, I read from quite a variety of news sources each day. You, on the other hand, sound like the the single-source (only al-jazeera?) person.
Originally posted by Kriz_4
And yet ONE Iranian posts here and you want rid of them. YOU can't take critisim, not Siroos.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Kriz_4
And yet ONE Iranian posts here and you want rid of them. YOU can't take critisim, not Siroos.
I never asked to get rid of anyone. I've only asked for 1. a level playing field and 2. don't spew it out if you can't take it yourself.
Try this simple test, Kriz. Count the posts. Then come back and tell me who is frantically posting.
Originally posted by Kriz_4
How is a SINGLE Iranian ever going to have that on this board.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Kriz_4
How is a SINGLE Iranian ever going to have that on this board.
Single Iranian, I doubt it.
I think, as far as I have been aware, however, there has been maybe 3 Iranians post on here. All have started out being very rational. But have been quickly out baited by those who openley support this axis of evil bs, VERY quickly.
But even if that were true, just looking at the active threads, the U.S. bashers obviously outnumber it's proponents by a wide margin.
The US is very active and VERY direct in it's foreign policies. It is the main superpower and whether you like it or not it's actions affect the rest of the world. In terms of population size, the US is fairly insignificant.
I hate US bashers, people who hate Americans because they are American. In my opinion, to be such a person, would be as idiotic as being an Arab hater or a Muslim hater or a French hater or a Christian hater or a European hater or a .... I think you get the idea.
Personaly, at his current moment in time, I think (just my opinion), US foreign policy stinks.
But still none of you can take it if someone gives a little back.
The opposite in fact.
I feel many of us have been recieving for a few decades now. Maybe it is the rest of the world that is now giving a "little back" and you cannot take it?
Perspective.
Originally posted by xmotex
How the hell does saying "we don't need to attack Iran" equal "America bashing?"