It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Byrd
Sheesh.
Everyone talks about "leftism" as though it suddenly cropped up in the past 5 minutes or so.
Liberals have been with us ever since the start of civilization.
Originally posted by Irish M1ck
As far as the "Fairness Doctrine"... what do you really have to lose?
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Regarding the portion of the essay posted here. It is the only writings I have read from this author but I think the point he makes is evident in the world around us! This is just how the liberal mind is.
.
Originally posted by semperfortis
reply to post by Irish M1ck
Now as obviously Lib Radio is possibly one of the biggest failures in Capitalist History, the Libs want the Government to FORCE, FREE radio station OWNERS to produce and present what has already been established as a failure!!!!
That is not just Socialism, it is borderline Fascism...
But Libs standing up for Rights???
You have GOT to be kidding...
Funniest darn thing I have heard in a long time.
Semper
Since Abraham Lincoln, Republicans have been there for blacks when it counted. Nevertheless, Democrats invariably take all the credit for the success of the civil rights movement and invariably fail to give any credit to Republicans
As a matter of fact, the record shows that since 1933 Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats.
In the 26 major civil rights votes after 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 percent of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 percent of the votes.
Civil Rights Act of 1964
The original House version:[9]
* Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
* Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
The Senate version:[9]
* Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]
* Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
* Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)
The Fairness Doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows or editorials. The doctrine did not require equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be presented.
What is wrong with that?
adj.
1. [bold]Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.[/bold]
Traditional or restrained in style: a conservative dark suit.
Moderate; cautious: a conservative estimate.
Of or relating to the political philosophy of conservatism.
Belonging to a conservative party, group, or movement.
Conservative Of or belonging to the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom or the Progressive Conservative Party in Canada.
Conservative Of or adhering to Conservative Judaism.
Tending to conserve; preservative: the conservative use of natural resources.
3 a: tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions
LIBRAL
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.
[3] (Note that a Republican is not necessarily the same thing as a "conservative" and a Democrat is not necessarily the same thing as a "liberal," as party affiliations are often wrongly used by journalists and pundits as synonyms for political outlooks. Also note that the mere fact that someone calls oneself a conservative or a liberal does not make that someone so.)
1. [bold]Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.[/bold]
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others;
Originally posted by semperfortis
reply to post by Irish M1ck
What is wrong with that?
And that sad old tale of "Switching Parties" is old and inaccurate...
Originally posted by semperfortis
reply to post by The Bald Champion
Why do you equate Police Officers with Conservatism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your argument in that direction, that limited in scope?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conservatism is supportive of individual rights
Liberalism supports Government intervention
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posting external information without the links is worthless as well as against the T&C
You have no argument if you cant share your source!
[edit on 12/20/2008 by semperfortis]