Let me try to put things in perspective, I don't want to ARGUE for or against anything, but I'd like to try to look at this situation as OBJECTIVELY
and CLEARLY as possible, to make sense of it, to really understand what is going on, not to determine "right" or "wrong".
A company that makes PHYSICAL products spends money on essentially 3 things:
1) Initial investment so you have the capability to produce your product (equipment, buildings, hardware/software, whatever).
2) Salary of everyone involved, because they need to eat/pay rent/wear clothes/etc.
3) Each new product costs money to CREATE initially, but in addition, each COPY also costs money, since it is a physical product that requires
physical materials.
A company that makes INTELLECTUAL property spends money on essentially 3 things:
1) Initial investment so you have the capability to produce your product (equipment, buildings, hardware/software, whatever).
2) Salary of everyone involved, because they need to eat/pay rent/wear clothes/etc.
3) Each new product costs money to CREATE initially, but each COPY is free because it is digital and making copies is like copying a file on your
computer (physical CD's don't count because we're not talking about stealing CD's from stores here, we're talking about "stealing" the digital
part only, and those are separate issues).
Let's say ONE person buys the physical product, like a car, and then everyone else in the world invades the factory and steals all the other cars.
Well, then the company loses essentially all its money, because the investment they made into EACH NEW CAR is taken away from them without any return,
except for the very first car. Company files bankrupcy and goes out of business.
Let's say ONE person buys a DIGITAL product, like a song, and then makes millions of copies and gives them away free to everyone else. Then the
entire investment by the music/movie studio, which includes people and equipment, yields no return as well. So yes, if the song is $1, then that's
all they have to show for all their investment, and they have NO money to make another song again (it would be pointless to borrow again from the
bank, if they'll only make $1 again for it)
-----------------------------------------------------------
What can we see from this? Well, yes, TECHNICALLY, if you buy something and then make your OWN copies of it with your OWN equipment (even if you use a
star trek replicator to make copies of your own car and give those copies away for free), then no you didn't STEAL anything, that is true, because
nothing is TAKEN from the company itself. But you DO deprive the company of returns for their investment, which includes numbers 1, 2, and 3 above. If
a company does not make MORE than it invests, then it FAILS and cannot continue to exist. If you only make $1 or less for every $1 that you invest,
then it makes absolutely no sense to invest, you'd not be MAKING MONEY, which is the point!
Now for a second Imagine if we ALL suddenly had Star Trek replicators and we could make infinite copies of ANY physical object, like a car. Well, we
buy ONE car, and we can make millions of copies and freely give those copies to everyone on the planet. Then of course, either the car company will
completely go broke and have NO money to make any new cars or even survive as a company, or they'll have to charge practically nothing for each new
car they make (which they cannot, because it costs a lot to make each one!). UNLESS the company had its own replicator, and could make infinite copies
of their cars for free - in which case each car would cost about as much as each mp3 file, around $1, since they only have to spend money on the
INITIAL investment to make the first car, just like the music/movie industry only spends initial investment to create the movie/album/song, and then
copies are free to make!
So even though it takes nothing to copy an mp3 millions of times, it takes a LOT of money to make the very first song, to pay for the quality
equipment (if you want a quality song), for the talented artists, for the editors, for everyone involved.
What is my conclusion?
Stealing is "taking what belongs to someone else", so if you buy a song, it now belongs to you, and if you make copies, they are YOURS too so
you're not stealing if you make copies and give'em to everyone. BUT the outcome is the same, which is, you deprive the company of its returns!
Now what is the problem? The problem is that the artists do not just get a SALARY and make a "living", and the people who make this stuff don't
just make a salary, they make a FORTUNE!! So it costs them $0.20 to make a CD that they sell for $15, and end up making a FORTUNE and buying big boats
and 15 cars and 3 mansions!
If their paychecks were only $40,000 a year or so, I'd never EVER deprive them of their returns, I have too much sympathy for people to cut
someone's $40,000 in half and make them struggle only to survive. But when the paychecks are $1,000,000 a year, I have no problem with cutting THEIR
paychecks in half or more, they'll just have to suck it up and get over it, they still have more than many of us will ever make in our lifetimes, and
if they are pissed off that they only get a million or 500 grand instead of a kazillion-bajillion, then we should send them to communist China and see
how they like their "equal pay" so they calm the f* down and get off their pedastal!#&*(#@
No, I'm not supporting communism, but neither am I supporting capitalism - both systems do not work for only one reason: Human selfishness.
Capitalism allows the elite few to have god-like riches while many starve, and communism completely cuts off your ability to make more money except if
you go into crime, which means there is no real incentive to be creative and work, and PLENTY of incentive to steal/kill/etc.
Capitalism just makes it "legal" to be a psychopath that doesn't give a flying f* about anyone but their own power and money, despite the fact that
you share this planet with billions of other humans. So what do we do? Well, the only way to CHANGE anything, is for every person to suddenly change
and stop being so selfish. As long as selfish and psychopathic people exist, they will find a way to "rise to the top", be it legal or not. If you
make it illegal then they'll do it illegally. If you make it legal, they'll do it both ways. But either way, the most psychopathic and the
greediest, who are willing to stop at nothing and do whatever it takes, will always win over those who have a conscience and sympathy for MANKIND.
So my suggestion to everyone with naive yet idealistic hopes to "change the world" is, stop trying because you can't, it is the way it is for a
reason, that reason being the nature of mankind - but you can CHANGE YOURSELF, and maybe inspire others to also change themselves, but this world will
nevertheless remain the playground of the greedy, ruthless, and the corrupt. And catch 22 is, for those with a conscience to do anything to change the
world, they'd have to step over their own conscience and become ruthless power-hungry psychopaths to stand a chance to compete with the very
psychopaths they'd want removed from power/control of this world, which would make you the same exact thing anyway, and so you'd defeat your own
purpose as a result!
If mankind changes its own service to self and greedy nature, the world will follow. Until that day, it won't change!
Good news is: There is a way to get the f* off this blood-stained rock, which is oh so beautiful but oh so corrupt and abused, and find a new
beautiful planet for those who are fed up with the "terror" of the situation on this planet as it is! And it has EVERYTHING to do with fundementally
changing yourself so you no longer fit, no longer "belong" here. We wouldn't be here if we all didn't belong, if we didn't "fit" in this world.
Maybe if we change ourselves and no longer fit with this world, we won't be here. But the devil, as always, is in the details.
Ahem... *straightens bowtie*. Thanks for your time =D
-Mike
[edit on 25-4-2005 by lilblam]