It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You have voted TheShroudOfMemphis for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
Originally posted by thecry
It will be very very difficult to beat Iran,Iran is a huge country with over 70 million people and Iran knows that a war with the U.S could happen within the next couple of years so they will be ready.With that said i think the U.S would beat them militarily but I also think it would be almost impossible to occupy it.
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
Its hard to see how the US can be compared to anything but Nazi-Germany when you think about it...
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
I for one support them in advance...
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
The general populous of America needs to WAKE UP and start defending HUMANS ALL AROUND THE WORLD NOT JUST YOURSELVES!!!
Originally posted by cjf
...and "Atomic Ayatollahs"... would be a very positive step for all of humanity?...
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
I for one support them in advance...
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
The general populous of America needs to WAKE UP and start defending HUMANS ALL AROUND THE WORLD NOT JUST YOURSELVES!!!
Originally posted by cjf
Which is it?....NM, I didn't see the part "it's all about oil"
Originally posted by ghostsoldier I for one support them in advance...
Originally posted by ghostsoldier start defending HUMANS ALL AROUND THE WORLD NOT JUST YOURSELVES!!!
Originally posted by WestPoint23
And to the people that say its all about the oil, if the U.S. is all about the oil why did we not take out Saddam in 91. And why are oil prices rising and profits falling or oil companies if the Iraq war was all about oil?
Originally posted by namehere
Originally posted by ghostsoldier I for one support them in advance...
and i hope you get shot for your support of killing americans, hell you should join them since you think we're so bad.
Originally posted by xmotex
Unlike the current Gulf war, I think the first one was entirely justified.
There is no doubt at all that Saddam invaded Kuwait, he may have had a justifiable beef about the slant drilling, but he could have seized the area with the rigs and left it at that. After the invasion, he was given plenty of time to pull out peacefully, and refused to do so.
And Bush Sr. was able to put together a coalition from a wide variety of countries because everyone knew Saddam had no justification for his invasion. Hell, nobody remembers these days, but even Syria sent troops to push Saddam out of Kuwait.
This Iraq war is entirely different. No matter how nasty an SOB Saddam was, he didn't attack anyone, hell, he couldn't even if he'd tried. Unlike the first war, it wasn't a reaction to an act of aggression. Saddam was at the very least contained, and in actually pretty much entirely neutralized as a military threat. Sure he was still a murdering scumbag, but if you look around, you'll see there are plenty of murdering scumbags running countries that we don't invade.
This doctrine of "preemptive" warfare is dangerous, doubly dangerous when the "threat" is entirely imaginary.