It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: arcticshuffle
Judge is obviously worried about his own upcoming election.
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
Anyone got MSNBC on?
Whatever they're saying over there is what's gonna be posted here by our resident leftists.
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
Both Willis and Wade clearly lied on the stand while under oath.
This ruling makes no sense.
BOTH should've been removed.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
Anyone got MSNBC on?
Whatever they're saying over there is what's gonna be posted here by our resident leftists.
NO
But I am gonna say -- per usual -- whatever doesn't go "your" way is deemed corrupt.
Personally, I think it is a smart legal decision -- to continue a case with only a blip of disruption.
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
How could just Wade be judged to be lying...when Willis and Wade shared the same story?
Wade gets thrown under the bus...and his practice and reputation has been effectively destroyed.
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
How could just Wade be judged to be lying...when Willis and Wade shared the same story?
Wade gets thrown under the bus...and his practice and reputation has been effectively destroyed.
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
How could just Wade be judged to be lying...when Willis and Wade shared the same story?
Wade gets thrown under the bus...and his practice and reputation has been effectively destroyed.
It sounds like the judge is saying he doesn't think they were lying (even though an eyewitness and technical data directly contradict their testimony) but that he wants one of them off the case to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest.
He ruled as a Democrat rather than as a judge.