Russian propaganda and Russian robots

a reply to: CarlLaFong

I wouldn't call threatening to make the UK (Britain, England whatever) cease to exist "bickering".

Rather harsh, no?

Anyway, seems the vodka bottle is empty now.

originally posted by: TheDiscoKing

originally posted by: RussianTroll

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: RussianTroll

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: RussianTroll

Is the Tucker/Putin interview a sure thing yet?
If so...it will be a 'must see'.

Russian media write that there will be an interview. They also write that Democrats in the United States are furious.
I'm also looking forward to this interview.))

Democrats in the US are always furious.

If a person is guided by emotions, he is always a loser. This is a worldwide law.)))

Tell that to William the Conqueror.

Or maybe he could tell that to Ivan Ivanovich?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: CarlLaFong

I wouldn't call threatening to make the UK (Britain, England whatever) cease to exist "bickering".

He's some old Russian fellow on the Internet...I really think the UK (Britain, England, whatever)...is safe from him and his threats.
So relax.
If Britain IS ever truly threatened again...it can count on it's American cousins in the US to save it for a second time.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Cheers, mate. How long will it take to repay you next time?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: CarlLaFong

Cheers, mate. How long will it take to repay you next time?

Who said we've been repaid for the first time?

originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Where is Britain?)))))

If you want an honest appraisal of Russia's true place in the world, you would have to combine all the economic and military holdings of all of NATO combined and compare it to Russia.

originally posted by: Blaine91555

originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Where is Britain?)))))

If you want an honest appraisal of Russia's true place in the world, you would have to combine all the economic and military holdings of all of NATO combined and compare it to Russia.

Why does it take a group of collected countries (NATO) to be in a team huddle together, with it’s “defense” sights on 1 main country, Russia?

More like U.S. has a flock of Bambi’s in the yard to take care of against a bear.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

In 2006?

www.independent.co.uk...

a reply to: Imhere

Because your mad leader has invaded Ukraine and threatens to nuke the UK?

You good with that?

a reply to: Imhere

Your bear has been de clawed and muzzled.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

If Britain IS ever truly threatened again...it can count on it's American cousins in the US to save it for a second time.

That old chestnut.
I wonder how long it would take you to answer the call though should it ever arise?

Seriously though, I don't think the UK is in any realistic direct danger of a Russian attack at present.
But there's no denying the rabid anti-UK sentiment of Putin and some of bum chums. They do seem quite obsessed with us which is bizarre as they keep on saying we are in irrelevance.

They aren't the only one's....yet everyone seems so keen for us to be on their side in times of crisis.

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: CarlLaFong

If Britain IS ever truly threatened again...it can count on it's American cousins in the US to save it for a second time.

That old chestnut.
I wonder how long it would take you to answer the call though should it ever arise?

Your gratitude is underwhelming.
Nevertheless, you're welcome.

a reply to: Imhere

Actually it's not. NATO's original reason for existing has evolved as the world evolves. There are other countries that have dreams of world domination, which puts them at odds with the Western World. MAD combined with a grouping of countries that are like-minded is needed to prevent the world from self-destructing.

Both sides use propaganda. In this country they made it legal back around 2011 for propaganda to be used to brainwash our own people here. Boy have they abused that law. Especially the political parties.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: CarlLaFong

If Britain IS ever truly threatened again...it can count on it's American cousins in the US to save it for a second time.

That old chestnut.
I wonder how long it would take you to answer the call though should it ever arise?

Your gratitude is underwhelming.
Nevertheless, you're welcome.

Can't be serious.. The US sat back and lapped up all the profits of the war. Allowing the allies to take heavy defeats and then swooped in last minute with an arsenal of wealth.. The arrogance is mind boggling

a reply to: CarlLaFong

History for a start.

On 31 December 2006, Britain made a final payments of about $83m (£45.5m) to the US and about $23.6m to Canada. By the end of World War II Britain had amassed an immense debt of £21 billion.

en.wikipedia.org...#:~:text=On%2031%20December%202006%2C%20Britain,debt%20of%20%C2%A321%20billion.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: CarlLaFong

History for a start.

On 31 December 2006, Britain made a final payments of about $83m (£45.5m) to the US and about $23.6m to Canada. By the end of World War II Britain had amassed an immense debt of £21 billion.

en.wikipedia.org...#:~:text=On%2031%20December%202006%2C%20Britain,debt%20of%20%C2%A321%20billion.

A small price to pay for not currently having to speak German.
Gern geschehen!

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Danke.

Around 1.06 million people in the United States speak the German language at home. It is the second most spoken language in North Dakota (1.39% of its population) and is the third most spoken language in 16 other states.

en.wikipedia.org...#:~:text=Around%201.06%20million%20people%20in,language%20in%2016%20other%20states.[ editby]edit on 5-2-2024 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)