Indictment number 3 for Trump announced

a reply to: Threadbare
The 1st amendment doesn’t apply in that court?
Interesting
Easy appeal win

a reply to: shooterbrody

Defendants are not allowed to intimidate witnesses, prosecutors, or employees of the court.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

Defendants are not allowed to intimidate witnesses, prosecutors, or employees of the court.

It's not Trumps fault that they are intimidated by the color of his skin.....

a reply to: Threadbare

He isn't. Telling someone they suck at their job, or are prejudice, or not qualified, it not intimidation. At all.

This is telling a former president that he cannot talk about his current case. Complete...and utter....bull#.

You may not like him but he is treated with such disrespect as a former POTUS it is incredible.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

Defendants are not allowed to intimidate witnesses, prosecutors, or employees of the court.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Hmmmm
That is the opposite of what was ruled…….

Interesting to see the same people march for rights for one group, then support no rights for other groups…..solely based on political ideology.


Or perhaps not…..

a reply to: matafuchs

Even Lauro admitted that Trump was saying things most defendants would not get away with saying.

a reply to: shooterbrody

The courts have long established that judges can issue gag orders to maintain order in their court.

a reply to: Threadbare

No, Trumps lawyer did not do that.

From Politico...

Link

this is ok....

Chutkan, who was appointed to the federal bench by former President Barack Obama, declined to impose restrictions on Trump’s ability to criticize Washington, D.C., or its residents. She also declined to restrict Trump’s claims that the prosecution is part of a political vendetta on the part of the Biden administration.

Says the the lawyer and the judge argued for 2 hours...

While Lauro insisted that Trump had complied fully with all existing orders in the case, he also seemed to warn the judge that she should not impose a gag order without thinking through the potential consequences. “Is your honor going to put President Trump in jail?”

Lauro asked bluntly at one point, calling it one of many questions posed by the “can of worms” created by the prosecution’s request.

You should be more honest...

The judge’s ruling followed a two-hour-long hearing in which she repeatedly sparred with Trump attorney John Lauro about the scope of any potential gag order and about the impact of Trump’s earlier provocative statements about potential witnesses and other participants in both the D.C. election subversion case and Trump’s other cases.

Lauro said early in the hearing that Trump would immediately appeal any order similar to the one prosecutors had requested. And on Monday afternoon, in a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump confirmed his intention to appeal. A Trump spokesperson called the gag order “an absolute abomination.”

This is BS. A gag order is about not talking about the case or revealing evidence. The MSM does not have a gag order and they can say whatever they want, right? I would think that would dirty the jury pool more than posts to Truth Social...right?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: matafuchs

Even Lauro admitted that Trump was saying things most defendants would not get away with saying.

8 years.

2 impeachments.

4 indictments

91 charges*

With the media, congress, hollywood, athletes, judges, lawyers etc etc all expressed their um, willingness to intimidate 1 man.


Lets see how honest you are. Question:

Do you believe Trump can receive a fair trial in the US? Be it one loves him or hates him, that is to say that anything he does can be seen as all or nothing?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

The courts have long established that judges can issue gag orders to maintain order in their court.

Your posts are worthless without sources.

a reply to: Threadbare

Actually, there are more people arrested for lying on firearm forms than gagged during trial....

Trump filed his appeal for the gag order. There's only one small issue. Lauro is not a member of the bar for the DC Circuit. He's been given until November 2 to complete his application.

Confirmation is coming out that Meadows was granted immunity in exchange for his testimony. He's been questioned at least three times by investigators this year, during which he admitted that he knew the was no widescale voting fraud in 2020 and that on numerous occasions conveyed to Trump he had lost.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Confirmation is coming out that Meadows was granted immunity in exchange for his testimony. He's been questioned at least three times by investigators this year, during which he admitted that he knew the was no widescale voting fraud in 2020 and that on numerous occasions conveyed to Trump he had lost.

10.24.2023

From America's Next President...

I don’t think Mark Meadows would lie about the Rigged and Stollen 2020 Presidential Election merely for getting IMMUNITY against Prosecution (PERSECUTION!) by Deranged Prosecutor, Jack Smith.

BUT, when you really think about it, after being hounded like a dog for three years, told you’ll be going to jail for the rest of your life, your money and your family will be forever gone, and we’re not at all interested in exposing those that did the RIGGING — If you say BAD THINGS about that terrible “MONSTER,” DONALD J. TRUMP, we won’t put you in prison, you can keep your family and your wealth, and, perhaps, if you can make up some really horrible “STUFF” a out him, we may very well erect a statue of you in the middle of our decaying and now very violent Capital, Washington, D.C..

Some people would make that deal, but they are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation.

I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them, but who really knows?

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!

Source: truthsocial.com...@realDonaldTrump/111293117150329703

Jack Smith is increasingly demonstrating how little REAL MATERIAL EVIDENCE he has.

The guy may really be a genuine dirt bag.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Threadbare
The 1st amendment doesn’t apply in that court?
Interesting
Easy appeal win

It's True . Owen Shroyer of INFOWARS went to Prison Today because he has " Somehow " Lost his First Amendment Right of Free Speech . WTF ?