Election Conspiracies Fuel Dispute Over Voter Fraud System

Here is a good one.... The main complaints about this ERIC program is that it was funded by George Soros who almost everyone knows is a political and economic manipulator who has thousands of leftist organizations under their umbrella. Another problem is that there is no accountability. They will not disclose where the data is and they are shady as hell. The founder is a shady Democratic political operative.

So, unfounded MAGA conspiracy????

Really?

apnews.com...

One state has dropped out, a second is in the process of doing so and a handful of other Republican-led states are deciding whether to stay.

The aim of the Electronic Registration Information Center, a voluntary system known as ERIC, has been to help member states maintain accurate lists of registered voters by sharing data that allows officials to identify and remove people who have died or moved to other states.

Shortly after, Louisiana left the group, citing concerns raised by the posts. A day after being sworn in last month, Alabama’s new secretary of state, Wes Allen, sent a letter informing the center of the state’s exit after criticizing the program during his campaign.

Other Republican-led states could follow, according to a survey of state election offices by The Associated Press. Officials in Florida and Missouri said they are evaluating their participation, while legislation in Texas could force the state to leave. West Virginia election officials declined to weigh in, saying they are “closely monitoring the situation with ERIC’s membership.”

The departures and potential for additional ones have frustrated state election officials involved in the effort and have demonstrated how deeply election conspiracies have spread throughout the Republican Party.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Election Integrity: Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) The New ACORN?

So, this group that states use to "validate accuracy of voter registrations" is a Democrat front company. Sounds kind of like ACORN accept they "police" voter rolls and report or omit anything they want. Shady, real shady here as usual.

Alabama’s new Secretary of State, Wes Allen, withdrew the state from the ERIC voter registration system. Allen said, “Since I was in town, I went to see the ERIC Headquarters. What I found was that there was no ERIC headquarters at that address. There were no employees. There were no servers. There was no ERIC presence of any kind. Instead. I found a virtual office that is rentable by the day. What it was missing was people, servers and any sign of the ERIC team.”

As previously reported by GP, ERIC has 3 employees that operate as remote staff. The Executive Director, Shane Hamlin, resides in Washington State. He has been unwilling to disclose where the data resides, not even the city. Ericka Haas is the Systems Engineer from the onset and resides in Oregon. GP reported on Sarah Whitt, their “Systems and Data Specialist”, hired in 2019. She resides in Wisconsin. Although her title indicates a “Specialist”, she previously worked for the State of WI managing their voter rolls for over a decade. You could say she “specialized” in creating the worst, most easily corrupted voter rolls in the country, containing 3.4 million ineligible voters. Now you know why ERIC hired her.

Controlled by leftists, NASS has been influencing the Secretary’s of State and our election policies across America for a long time. In fact, the newly elected SOS’s were provided a “new member orientation” last week to learn about NASS. Of course Mi­crosoft hosted and sponsored the reception afterwards. NASS has a long list of 58 corporations who are involved in swaying election officials and policies.

David Becker was the founder of ERIC while employed at Pew Charitable Trust. He then founded his own non-profit called CEIR to service Democrats with elections. Oddly, he retained a seat on the ERIC board. His bias and no-holds barred Democrat activism is part of the reason our elections have become so untrustworthy.

This June 2022 report showing Becker obtained ERIC data for his own non-profit, to help Democrats, was still not enough to get him canned. Why?

Becker has been the guy behind the scenes pulling the strings at ERIC. He’s why this tiny non-profit always has leftists in control, unwilling to police itself, or provide any transparency. Becker conducts most every ERIC media interview and is first to counter the negative image of ERIC using his press contacts.

a reply to: infolurker

Let's not forget Hammer and ScoreCard.
This was developed by a few members of the CIA, and ignored by some at the FBI.
This information was then distributed to the chinese, and they manipulated the election results, via the internet.
SNF

All of this is unnecessary with voter I'd.

And in-person voting on the day of.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
All of this is unnecessary with voter I'd.

And in-person voting on the day of.

There's a lot more to election integrity than just those things. Elections and their related technologies are extremely advanced and complex. In-person voters in certain locations in Maricopa County's 2022 election ran into issues that led to their ballots not being properly tabulated on election day for example. Inflated voter role registrations increase the chances of illegal ballots coming in "backdoors" in the case of ERIC. Things like proper chain-of-custody records, and other election record retention are also important, but ultimately fraud becomes difficult to impossible to detect without full auditing and honest officials in place.

Fraud is a cat and mouse game between criminals and law enforcement, however there seems to be a lack of balance between these to forces with regards to a lot of the suspected election fraud we have seen.

Being able to steal positions of power, especially in key states, has the potential to be a big business, and a lot of evidence suggest that this is the case. To add to the complexity of the situation, there's a lot of potential for corrupted officials and cover-ups being used to carry out election fraud agendas.

I think that there also needs to be some acceptance that election fraud is just a symptom of a much larger problem or problems.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
All of this is unnecessary with voter I'd.

And in-person voting on the day of.

They will NEVER let that happen. The whole reason for these systems is to know "who" to make mail in or absentee ballots for (in my opinion).

a reply to: IndieA

Elections and election integrity are complex. Election integrity requires robust (rather than complex systems). Tabulation is arithmetic, anything more complex in software to tabulate is needlessly, perhaps dangerously complex.

Counter-intrusion/cyber-security protecting the simple arithmetic of tabulation should be both robust and complex.

Clean voter rolls are good.

Tabulation software that uses a float instead of a long int for counting votes is at best total garbage and at worst, intentionally designed to be compromised, or fail.