AP report: Russian missiles crossed into Poland, killing 2, US official says

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Yes, article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .

Remember yesterday.....?

“Hitting NATO territory with missiles. … This is a Russian missile attack on collective security! This is a really significant escalation. Action is needed,” Zelensky said in a video address Tuesday.

He also said Ukraine has long warned the war could spill across borders and added it’s “only a matter of time before Russian terror goes further.”

a reply to: JinMI

Suggest you take up your concerns with NATO.

They don't seem that bothered about it.

Are you bothered about massive missile attacks on Ukrainian cities?

Apparently not.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

Suggest you take up your concerns with NATO.

They don't seem that bothered about it.

Are you bothered about massive missile attacks on Ukrainian cities?

Apparently not.

Dont bust a hip with that quick of a pivot.

a reply to: JinMI

Whatever.

Answer the question, please?

By the way, a SAM accidentally falling in NATO county is not an "armed attack".

It's an accident


Just as well you don't have your finger on the big red button.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Whatever.

Woops.

a reply to: JinMI

And my question?

So Zelenskyy...knowing full well it was one of his own missiles that struck Poland, killing two Polish citizens...LIED to EVERYONE...in a half-assed and crude attempt to bring NATO forces into the conflict in order to start WW3...while also forcing congress to pass through another quick $37B gift to Ukraine!

This is our friend?
This is a man we should trust?

How many OTHER dangerous lies has Zelenskyy been selling us?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Trust?


Pffft, were sending more billions!

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IAMTAT

Trust?


Pffft, were sending more billions!

With $91B sent already...er shouldn't we also demand some sort of an audit?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IAMTAT

Trust?


Pffft, were sending more billions!

With $91B sent already...er shouldn't we also demand some sort of an audit?

Audit?

Lol!

Audit....youre a funny guy Tat.

Ukraine is above reproach and a beacon of integrity. Just like our executive branch and all its sub agencies.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IAMTAT

Trust?


Pffft, were sending more billions!

With $91B sent already...er shouldn't we also demand some sort of an audit?

Why not claim that we sent Ukraine 91 trillion?

It isn't any less untrue than fabricating the 91 billion number.

a reply to: YellowBlueSky22

Have an exact number?

originally posted by: YellowBlueSky22

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IAMTAT

Trust?


Pffft, were sending more billions!

With $91B sent already...er shouldn't we also demand some sort of an audit?

Why not claim that we sent Ukraine 91 trillion?

It isn't any less untrue than fabricating the 91 billion number.

Please correct me with the correct amount sent to Ukraine.
While you're at it...since we have no audit...please also tell me how it all was spent by Zelenskyy.

a reply to: JinMI


I'm perfectly OK with you guys claiming either 91 billion or 91 trillion, none of those claims mean any more than that '81 million' claim without any 'evidence'.

I'm ready to laugh at whatever quadrillion dollar claim comes Next, unless it's accompanied by some actual evidence.

Then an actual discussion can begin.




Maybe tomorrow I'll claim Trump stole 32 trillion from the Treasury just for kicks!

Wouldn't be any less insane than some of the repeated Ukrainian funding claims.

a reply to: YellowBlueSky22

So no number.


Can we still afford it?

A CIA/Zelenski operation that failed to start WWIII.

Not Russian missiles. Biden even stupidly confirmed it wasn't Russia. The MSM failed to get the memo.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Zelenskys immediate press quote was enough to see through the facade.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
A CIA/Zelenski operation that failed to start WWIII.

Maybe the next one will finally make it happen.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Zelenskys immediate press quote was enough to see through the facade.

This is what Zelinsky actually said in that press conference:




Do you see anything that supports the word twisted russian propaganda claims?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: YellowBlueSky22

So no number.


Can we still afford it?

I didn't make the claim, not interested in defending the claims made by others.


Yes. And then some.

We can't afford not to.



But I'd be ok with using the 300b in gold we took from russia to pay for it if that would make you feelz better.