They paid people to shame and insult the unvaxxed...

originally posted by: Daughter2


It just wasn't true the vaccine stopped transmissions and they had no basis to tell the public it would.

Except that the sources in my signature show conclusively that the vax significantly reduced transmission rates.

When you have less covid in you, and it's there for a shorter period of time, you have less opportunity to infect others.

And if those people are also vaxxed, then their less likely to get covid and less likely to get sick from it.

My sources are conclusive, you don't even have a bitchute video.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Daughter2


It just wasn't true the vaccine stopped transmissions and they had no basis to tell the public it would.

Except that the sources in my signature show conclusively that the vax significantly reduced transmission rates.

When you have less covid in you, and it's there for a shorter period of time, you have less opportunity to infect others.

And if those people are also vaxxed, then their less likely to get covid and less likely to get sick from it.

My sources are conclusive, you don't even have a bitchute video.

We can't see any sources here.
You should post as everyone else whatever you have and link them in this thread or other threads. As far as everyone is concerned you have no much evidence for what you claim.

The other claims you have made are just your own opinions.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

"We", again?

Who's "we"?

a reply to: MaxxAction

The plan is detailed in the judicial watch documents pretty well. How much evidence of collusion and deceit is required for the skeptical to understand you are being treated like sheep because too many like to act like one.www.judicialwatch.org...

originally posted by: steve910
I thought shaming and insults meant nothing to the "# your feelings" crowd? Also...when all of these shamers and insulters are dead from the clot shot and experimental gene therapy depopulation scheme you won't need to endure the shame and insults any longer.

There, there, it'll be okay.

That part might be ok but losing all those lives to this hoax will never be "ok", IMHO.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: MaxxAction
In the united states just like was claimed in the EU, and the Uk.

(Cue Twilight Zone opening music) Imagine if you will, a vaccine so efficacious that you have to pay people to shame others into getting it.

Cue sound of broken record being put on for the bazillionth time.

Yes, and this is perfectly normal.

In fact it's so mundane that you have to be willfully dense not to know that this kind of thing happens a million times a day for a million types of thing.

Let's see:

a vaccine so efficacious that you have to pay people to shame others into getting it

Forrest fires, so bad you need to pay people to shame others into not starting them.

Crossing the street in the right place, so sensible you need pay people to shame kids into doing it.

Sexual harassement, so bad you need to pay people shame other people into not doing it.

Dropping litter, such statement on the character of your neighborhood you need to pay people to shame people into stopping doing it.

That's right, this is simply another PSA campaign aimed at getting people to do, or stop doing something that they should be doing, or shouldn't be doing, whatever the case may be.

You must see hundreds of these things every day, from messages on the sides of busses to signs outside of schools. It's only sinister if you think vaccines are sinister.

Do you think that it's sinister to have an animated bear telling you not to set up a grill in dry grass, or guy in a purple dinosaur costume telling kids not to jaywalk?

No, because you accept that wildfires and dead children are bad things.

These are all common sense type of situations whereas the vaccines really needed people to think about their own health. Some went for it, some didn't and that's all fine, but what should never happen is a government level propaganda to shame them for not taking it.

The covid wasn't that bad for most so there was nothing wrong with saying no to a vaccine. People do this every year with flu shots, they make a decision and move on. It shouldn't have been more than that but it was and that is the issue.

a reply to: machineintelligence

How much evidence of collusion and deceit is required for the skeptical to understand you are being treated like sheep because too many like to act like one?

Ughhh...

I just cannot wrap my head around it.

First, that so many bought the big scary narrative, and fed themselves a non stop diet of it for 15 to 18 months.

Then, they allowed themselves to be guinea pigs for an unknown, untested, and unproven gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine.

Finally, after all the evidence now that it was all a gigantic cluster of lies, deceit, and misdirection, people are STILL acting like sheep and swallowing everything that the media, medicine, and big pharma sets out for them.

Was it any worse than any other "health drive" or public health initiative as I'd guess you call it?


a reply to: igloo

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Daughter2


It just wasn't true the vaccine stopped transmissions and they had no basis to tell the public it would.

Except that the sources in my signature show conclusively that the vax significantly reduced transmission rates.

When you have less covid in you, and it's there for a shorter period of time, you have less opportunity to infect others.

And if those people are also vaxxed, then their less likely to get covid and less likely to get sick from it.

My sources are conclusive, you don't even have a bitchute video.

I am afraid you don't have any sources to back your claims and especially the ones about transmission.

What does it mean to 'have less Covid in you for a shorter period of time' ?? Which books have you been reading in biology??

If you want you want to find about transmission you should ask the representative of Pfizer and Pfizer itself as they are moving at the speed of science and didn't even bother to check about it...

Shaming others for said no to an untested and potentially hazardous product?

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I doubt Jennifer Aniston had being vaccinated.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Daughter2


It just wasn't true the vaccine stopped transmissions and they had no basis to tell the public it would.

Except that the sources in my signature show conclusively that the vax significantly reduced transmission rates.

When you have less covid in you, and it's there for a shorter period of time, you have less opportunity to infect others.

And if those people are also vaxxed, then their less likely to get covid and less likely to get sick from it.

My sources are conclusive, you don't even have a bitchute video.

Your sources are mostly a year old now. Science and discovery have moved on. Much has been revealed that may call your old data into question, including the pharmaceutical companies and politicians caught lying.

originally posted by: nonspecific
Was it any worse than any other "health drive" or public health initiative as I'd guess you call it?


a reply to: igloo

Coupled with massive propaganda, I'd say yes.

We had a minor pandemic at worst and common sense would have most people simply wash their hands/cover coughs. Little more was needed. However, the propaganda was needed to squash this common sense and create fear, and ultimately blind panic to usher in the illusion of needing vaccines.

All about those profitable vaccines.

Editing to add, I don't know why you bother. We were all here for almost three years discussing this and most of us feel the same way about it. No one is changing their minds at this point, in fact every day brings new info that just adds to what should be the criminal case of the century, both for the propaganda and vaccines.

We are here in these threads because we are interested, you and some others seem to delight in argument rather than the gathering of new info. If you believe the shots were dead safe, great. Most of us don't though and you'll never change my mind. I've seen a rise in suspicious deaths among my community and extended family well after omicron the mildest variant, which is why I stay interested in the possibility that it's the shots. Until there is concrete, trials based evidence it remains a possibility but it sure looks like they were ineffective at best with the number of covid cases the vaccinated keep getting.

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I doubt Jennifer Aniston had being vaccinated.

She did shame others and was used to promote vaccines.

I don't know whether she has been vaccinated or not but shame on her!

a reply to: Justoneman

What comments might those be?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You do understand there is a difference between reducing something and stopping something. Before a person put an experimental drug into their body or their child's body, they had a right to know this information.

People have right to weigh the risks. About seven years ago, I had a doctor prescribe an off label use of a drug. The drug was approved but not in the way the doctor was using it. When the pharmacist gave me the drug, it was packaged in a weird way, that's when I asked if it when through FDA testing - he said no, not in the way your doctor is using it - I say no thank you.
Maybe if I was dying and the drug was my only option, I would have taken it but it was my choice.

No one has a right to withhold or twist information even if they think it's for the greater good.

Reducing and stopping are two totally different things.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Justoneman

What comments might those be?

Just about every single post that isn't a question......

a reply to: AaarghZombies

My sources are conclusive, you don't even have a bitchute video.

Conclusive ? Mate your sources are a joke.

Every source you have bookmarked can be traced back to some Liberal Funded Think tank , I seriously cannot believe you are still repeating the same tired BS.

When all the Witches at Salem and across the world were being Burned the masses were convinced they were right , They were convinced these woman were Evil the overwhelming majority of Societal Authority were convinced these woman were Witches.

And now look back at that page in history and realize how ridiculous it was .

Aaargh mate you are wrong wrong wrong and at this point I think you know that but simply do not care , Because screw it it's just the internet.

a reply to: Justoneman

When have I ever made a comment, ever, that might lead anyone to believe me to be a Socialist?