posted on Apr, 2 2005 @ 04:34 AM
The remnants of nuclear reactors nearly two billion years old were found in the 1970s in Africa. These reactors are thought to have occurred
naturally. No natural reactors exist today, since the relative density of fissile uranium has now decayed below that needed for a sustainable
reaction. Pictured above is Fossil Reactor 15, located in Oklo, Gabon. Uranium oxide remains are visible as the yellowish rock. Oklo by-products are
being used today to study the stability of the fundamental constants over cosmological time-scales and to develop more effective means for disposing
of human-manufactured nuclear waste. Photo by: Robert D. Loss, WAISRC
I-4 Nuclear Reactor from Two Billion Years Ago
[PureInsight.org] In 1972, a French company imported some uranium ore from Oklo in the Gabon Republic in Africa. Surprisingly the uranium
concentration in the ore was as low as spent uranium fuel from a nuclear reactor. The finding led scientists to believe that the uranium had already
been used for energy production. This discovery shocked the world and attracted scientists from many countries to go to Oklo for further
investigation. The results showed that the uranium mine was an ancient nuclear reactor. The ancient reactor consisted of five hundred tons of utilized
uranium ore in six different areas. Its output power was estimated to be approximately one hundred kilowatts. The reactor was perfectly preserved and
its layout was very rational. It is estimated that the reactor had been in operation for around 500,000 years. Furthermore, nuclear wastes produced in
this reactor had not spread all over the surrounding areas. Instead, they were confined within the separate sections. From the perspective of modern
nuclear technology, this ancient reactor used very advanced techniques.
According to geological dating, the Oklo uranium mine was formed about 2 billion years ago. Shortly after formation, the nuclear reactor commenced
operation. The research results made scientists seriously consider the possibility of prehistoric civilization. Such a nuclear reactor could be a
product of a civilization from long ago, although scientists have proposed completely natural mechanisms by which the chain reactions could have taken
Human beings have only made use of nuclear power for a couple of decades. This discovery raised the intriguing possibility that a technologically more
advanced civilization existed two billion years ago and it had advanced knowledge of nuclear fission. But if this assumption were correct, one would
ask why such an advanced civilization did not perpetuate its own existence. Instead, it disappeared for unknown reasons, leaving only ancient relics.
How should we view such a discovery? A large unaccounted-for time gap exists between two billion years ago and our present historical human
civilization. What could have happened during that time?
If we neglect relics of prehistoric civilization, there is no way we can broaden the scope of our present knowledge. We will neither know what caused
prehistoric civilizations to degenerate, or how they finally came to disappear. Moreover, we should carefully examine whether our current method of
scientific development is following the same disastrous road. This is surely a subject worthy of serious consideration.
I read somewhere else that the catholic church and the USA government wanted this to be covered up as quickly as possible..."We will fight the