It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bush Accused of Sexual Assault

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 03:57 PM
link   
U.S. media still REFUSES to mention Bush sexual assault lawsuit that Texas woman continues to pursue

Texas woman continues to pursue a lawsuit she filed last December against George W. Bush alleging that the White House inhabitant sexually assaulted her.

Contacted by phone at her home in mid-July by this writer, plaintiff Margie Denise Schoedinger said I was one of the first media members to attempt to contact her about the case. In case you�re counting, that�s more than seven months after she filed the legal brief in a Fort Bend County court.

�I am still trying to prosecute [the lawsuit],� said Schoedinger, a 38-year-old African-American woman who lives in the Houston suburb of Missouri City. �I haven�t had a court date set, yet�.I want to get this matter settled and go on with my life.�

I must say at this point that I�ve been a journalist for mostly mainstream publications for more than 20 years. In my time, I�ve dealt with my fair share of crackpots, probably more than my fair share. I�ve been around the block a few times � and have survived so far.

But Schoedinger didn�t sound like the average crackpot. She sounded intelligent, articulate, soft-spoken, and yeah, even honest over the phone, for whatever that�s worth. I know many people who sound honest � like a certain White House occupant at times � are really not. But my point is that Schoedinger didn�t sound like she was on drugs, although being drugged by federal agents is part of her lawsuit.

Anyways, I could only unearth one U.S. mainstream newspaper that has mentioned the lawsuit - a December 2002 story by the Texas-based Fort Bend Star. And that paper even later ran a nasty letter by a reader recommending it fire the reporter for simply doing her job and covering the story.

Not even scandal sheets like the National Enquirer will report on this lawsuit, to my knowledge, although they cover the latest allegations about Clinton and other Democrats. Hell, I once read a story in one of those scandal sheets that said Clinton was dating a woman with three breasts. And they can�t find the space to mention a sexual assault lawsuit against our latest White House occupant?

If Schoedinger had filed a lawsuit against Clinton, do you think the story would be at least mentioned in every U.S. media outlet from Maine to Hawaii to Alaska to Florida? I�d bet my mortgage on it. Can you say mainstream media double standard, once again?

www.opednews.com...



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 03:58 PM
link   
I thought that was clinton's department.




posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 03:59 PM
link   
You just can handle the depth's of evil this president is involved in.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:00 PM
link   
Is there no level of scum and filth that the repugnant will not engage in?



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:01 PM
link   
I thought you were still maintaing that he prefers small boys.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Is there no level of scum and filth that the repugnant will not engage in?


yes, he's almost down to clinton's level.

oh wait, he has alot more murders to go..
sorry.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:03 PM
link   
Just because she said it happened,does not mean that it did happen. This could be the reason that no one ids covering it. There may not be a lot there. You know Bush is innocent until proven guilty.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by nyeff
Just because she said it happened,does not mean that it did happen. This could be the reason that no one ids covering it. There may not be a lot there. You know Bush is innocent until proven guilty.


But, they crucify Clinton and they're about to crucify Kobe Bryant.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:11 PM
link   
is 'Jackson Thoreau' doing what I think, yup, pulling out the race card. thats what is filth, Colonel.

He then goes on to mention " mind-control experiments and sex orgies that the CIA and other parties play around with"


CIA, sex orgies, mind control, race relations, media conspiracy, voting machine fraud, skull and bones - that story has it ALL, a conspiracy-cocktail: Colonel, honestly, great friggin' find!

You get an applause for that!


[Edited on 18-7-2003 by Bob88]



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:14 PM
link   
Oh, that's right. One line out of the entire piece makes the WHOLE article a fraud. YOU amaze me to no end.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:16 PM
link   
The crucified Clinton because there was proof. And he admitted it. He also had a long history of womanizing. If Bush did this then I would expect him to pay a price. I don't have double standards. I would hope he would be man enough to admit if he did it and and plea bargin as others have done.
But like I said before,I'm guessing there isn't much here. Or the press would be all over it.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:20 PM
link   
There's so much filth and intimidation in that article that its truly disgusting. Why do people question me when I say repugnats are vile?



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Oh, that's right. One line out of the entire piece makes the WHOLE article a fraud. YOU amaze me to no end.


since we ARE discussing lawsuits and the courtroom.

credibility is very important and something like that CAN potentially ruin any chances of winning.

so yes the small things are important. ask any judge or attorney worth their salt.

it may not be what you want to hear but its the truth.



and btw the double standard the media has, swings both ways. of course expecting the media to give you the full story of anything makes you a sucker to begin with.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
You just can handle the depth's of evil this president is involved in.



Colonel......ever heard of the expression....."the further one looks the more blurred the horizon gets?"

This is not a matter of "handling the depths of evil this president is involved in"..........
this is a matter of "handling the depths of evil for which YOU, with your hatred, etc., are INVOLVING your self in.......
I have seen some low doings of some poeple in regards to "uncovering" faults in someone, but you sir, have no business "digging" when your own backyard is filled with "skeletons" of its own!!!

You profess to be a Christian, but in your unbridled, warped sense of hatred, you decide that digging up one's own past is a tool used to "expose one's evils" YET, you fail to realize that in practicing such "evils", you become evil!.......

Quite idiotic to say the least and from someone as educated as you.....quite unnecessary to get your points across. But look at the depths that you are now sinking too.....


regards
seekerof

[Edited on 18-7-2003 by Seekerof]



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by nyeff
The crucified Clinton because there was proof. And he admitted it. He also had a long history of womanizing. If Bush did this then I would expect him to pay a price. I don't have double standards. I would hope he would be man enough to admit if he did it and and plea bargin as others have done.
But like I said before,I'm guessing there isn't much here. Or the press would be all over it.


Yes, you do have double standards. If I recall, womanizing isn't a crime. However, age sex with minors is and if you read that article, there is a litany of cases where repugnats are having illicit affairs and episodes of sex with minors (and making have have abortions).



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof

Originally posted by Colonel
You just can handle the depth's of evil this president is involved in.



Colonel......ever heard of the expression....."the further one looks the more blurred the horizon gets?"

This is not a matter of "handling the depths of evil this president is involved in"..........
this is a matter of "handling the depths of evil for which YOU, with your hatred, etc., are INVOLVING your self in.......
I have seen some low doings of some poeple in regards to "incovering" faults in someone, but you sir, have no business "digging" when your own backyard requires doesn't have "skeletons" of its own!!!

You profess to be a Christian, but in your unbridled, warped sense of hatred, you decide that digging up one's own past is a tool used to "expose one's evils" YET, you fail to realize that in practicing such "evils", you become evil!.......

Quite idiotic to say the least and from someone as educated as you.....quite unnecessary to get your points across. But look at the depths that you are now sinking too.....


regards
seekerof


Ah ha! I have struck the chord. I have finally burned the Bush God with the light of truth so much that the repugnants are recoiling like the vampires that they are. Yes, MORE LIGHT! MORE TRUTH!

[Edited on 18-7-2003 by Colonel]



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:27 PM
link   
You are pathetic.........simply pathetic....


regards
seekerof



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:29 PM
link   
Look, its all there. The truth:

"Quick now, has anyone heard of Randy Ankeney? He was a rising star in Colorado Republican circles until he was arrested in 2001 and accused of trying to have sex with a 13-year-old girl he met through the Internet. Police said he even warned the girl he�d ruin her life if she told anyone. Does that sound familiar? That�s how many of these Republicans keep their affairs quiet � they threaten a bunch of people. Another 17-year-old girl said Ankeney sexually assaulted her while working on a political campaign. Last year, he pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault of a child.

What about Republican hypocrite John Fund, who was moved to the Wall Street Journal�s Internet magazine after reports came out that he impregnated the daughter of an old girlfriend and then the supposed anti-abortion-supporter looked the other way when she aborted his child? Does Republican Marty Glickman, one of those rabid dog conservative talk radio commentators in Florida who was arrested in 2001 and charged with giving drugs and money to underage girls in exchange for sex, ring a bell?

How about Parker J. Bena, a Virginia Republican activist who proudly cast one of his state�s electoral vote for Bush in 2000, being indicted for possessing child pornography in 2001? Anyone hear of Kevin T. Coan, a Republican director of the St. Louis Election..."

Board who was charged with trying to solicit sex from a 14-year-old girl in cyberspace? Or Virginia Republican activist Richard Delgaudio who was sentenced to two years probation in 2003 after pleading guilty to a child pornography charge?

Then there is Philip Giordano, the former Republican mayor of Waterbury, Conn., who was recently sentenced to 37 years in prison for soliciting sex with underaged girls and violating their civil rights. It�s more likely you�ve heard of him since this case has received ample media coverage unlike most of the other sex stories involving Republicans. Another case that got some attention was Beverly Russell, a leader in the Republican-based Christian Coalition and Pat Robertson�s former presidential campaign who allegedly molested children-drowner Susan Smith....

What about Bill Thomas, Bob Livingston, Dick Armey, Dan Burton, Charles Canady, J.C. Watts, Helen Chenoweth, Sue Myrick, Ken Calvert, John Peterson, Dan Crane, Donald Lukens, Jim Gilmore, Scott McInnis and Arlan Stangeland � all Republican politicians accused of various sexual misdeeds? Most of these hypocrites attacked Clinton for his affairs and expressed outrage when people put a microscope on their private sexual lives."

Its all there. The TRUTH.





[Edited on 18-7-2003 by Colonel]



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:33 PM
link   
And now you know my name is The Colonel.










I am happy.



posted on Jul, 18 2003 @ 04:40 PM
link   
I did not say womanizing was a crime,but lying about it under oath is. All I was pointing out was Clintons past history. He has a history of using woman. Bush does not. You are the one with a double standard. And to make things worse you already have a guilty Bush verdict in,on no evidence. Come on Colonel. I would expect Bush to be a man and come clean ifhe did it. But I would think he would be no worse off than Clinton. We have a history to go on,now,set by CLINTON. Bush should be treated the same,you know a slap on the wrist.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join