It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
Just the point I was making is one side is treated far more severely than the other when both broke laws, both injured people, both assaulted police, etc.
Its not mental gymnastics to excuse their behavior.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
Just the point I was making is one side is treated far more severely than the other when both broke laws, both injured people, both assaulted police, etc.
Who was running the Justice Department when this happened? The 'Law and Order Party', right?
Its not mental gymnastics to excuse their behavior.
Sure it is, you're pissed because the RWNJ criminals are getting prosecuted after your side failed to do anything about the LWNJ's. You support lawlessness and violence out of some sort of bizarre sense of karma.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
But it is not independent and unbiased, it has favored democrats for many years now.
No, I DO NOT support lawlessness and violence.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
My anger at one side being treated differently than the other in no way shape or form indicates that I believe anyone should not be prosecuted for breaking the law.
Yet not once have you actually said that those POS's should be in jail, you actually lamented the fact that they were and felt it was unfair.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
Just the point I was making is one side is treated far more severely than the other when both broke laws, both injured people, both assaulted police, etc.
Who was running the Justice Department when this happened? The 'Law and Order Party', right?
Its not mental gymnastics to excuse their behavior.
Sure it is, you're pissed because the RWNJ criminals are getting prosecuted after your side failed to do anything about the LWNJ's. You support lawlessness and violence out of some sort of bizarre sense of karma.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
In response to my statement that people here in the US are playing both sides just like people in Russia and Ukraine you said:
I am not trying to put people in jail for 15 years just for criticizing their governments
and I reminded you that there are people in jail right now for criticizing their government on Jan 6th. Its not as different as you would like it to be.
I never said anything about putting people in jail and killing them. What a phucking stupid pathetic asshat attempt at a strawman argument that was....
originally posted by: sarahvital
i think you mean persecuted.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
My anger at one side being treated differently than the other in no way shape or form indicates that I believe anyone should not be prosecuted for breaking the law.
Yet not once have you actually said that those POS's should be in jail, you actually lamented the fact that they were and felt it was unfair.
My anger at one side being treated differently than the other in no way shape or form indicates that I believe anyone should not be prosecuted for breaking the law.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
I said it right here. "...in no way shape or form indicates that I believe anyone should not be prosecuted for breaking the law." What does the word "anyone" mean in your world? What does the word "prosecuted" mean in your world?
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
Incarceration is a given if they are guilty.
Source: www.foxnews.com...
A German court convicted a 97-year-old woman accessory to over 10,000 murders for her role as secretary to a Nazi SS commander stationed at a concentration camp in World War II.
The court's Tuesday ruling found that Irmgard Furchner worked at the Stutthof concentration camp in what is now Poland, according to the Associated Press.
Furcher argued she had no knowledge of the 10,505 murders that she was accused of being an accessory to.
Prosecutors countered that the muster point for new arrivals to Stutthof was visible from her office window, and the crematoriums at the camp were running constantly during her time there.