Advice to Parents of 5 to 11 year-old Children - Do NOT Inject them with a Covid-19 Vaccine.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: HawkeyeNation

What long term effects of a cold virus? because that is what covid is, no worst than the Flu, the scaremongering in favor of the jabs is what makes people think the virus is gona get you.

Two years is plenty of prove of a virus that never will kill humanity, but the jabs are for life, that crap injected into your body is there to stay for life and you will still get covid, because lets come clean is not about the virus is about the jab.

Get ready because the globalist are no done yet, they will release another variant with the boosters, the scaremongering have to stay alive.

Actually, the stuff that they inject into you breaks down in a couple of weeks tops. One of the reasons that we haven't been using mRNA vaxxes for years is that it's actually pretty difficult to keep the stuff around long enough for it to do what it's supposed to to.

Early attempts at an mRNA vax failed because the it degraded or was destroyed before it could get into the cells to tell them to produce the proteins for the anti-bodies to attack.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Its a reason why they stopped trying to make an mRNA vax for allergies it was tried but stopped.

DNA and mRNA vaccination against allergies

only a minority of patients decides to undergo this treatment. Alternatively, early prophylactic intervention in young children has been proposed to stop the increase in patient numbers. Plasmid DNA and mRNA vaccines encoding allergens have been shown to induce T helper 1 as well as T regulatory responses, which modulate or counteract allergic T helper 2–biased reactions.

With regard to prophylactic immunization, additional safety measurements are required. In contrast to crude extracts, genetic vaccines provide the allergen at high purity. Moreover, by targeting the encoded allergen to subcellular compartments for degradation, release of native allergen can be avoided. Due to inherent safety features, mRNA vaccines could be the candidates of choice for preventive allergy immunizations

it has to be kept in mind that such an allergen‐free treatment might only work for allergies against ubiquitous and perennial allergens like those derived from house‐dust mite. In this case, permanent contact with allergen(s) might contribute to the therapeutic effect.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

The thing is that is more to the jab that was been told about, all the secrecy all the hidden facts, until this day all the information we get is not directly from pharma as they do not have to tell anything, is just not the technology in the jab is more to it.

With full protections the experiment is on going, that should be a red flag to anybody that took the jab. For what I been reading no even the doses are the same for everybody and the reason why some people get bad side effects while others do not.

You can not have to many people all at once dying or been maimed by the darn jab.

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: HawkeyeNation

True, but I'd still trust the human body's natural defenses over an untested man-made gene therapy.

The problem for me is I don't think this is natural. I mean to some extent it is but I firmly believe this was modified by scientists. Now, the release out into the wild is something I'm not sure if it was done on purpose or not (I would say likely).

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Everybody knows that the Polio vaccine was just a depopulation weapons. Just look at how it's decimated the population already.

NoNo it's all vaccines! You have to get it right if you're gonna migrate to our side pal.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: HawkEyi

It's scary to think people never question the box in the room that sends them messages all day long. Almost like it's designed to replace critical thinking.

You'll be hard pressed in the UK to find anyone brought up on a diet of BBC TV who will reject a vaccine.

Both Biden and Trump say that the shot is safe. Are they both lying?

Looki here zombie is waking up, yes of course they are both lying, thats pretty much the only quality a person needs to get in to those positions. lying and cheating.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn

originally posted by: SoundisVibration

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

Both Biden and Trump say that the shot is safe. Are they both lying?

Yes! The pharmaceutical money flows all ways. Hence why Trump got booed at his own rally for telling people to get vaxxed.

I think the government has already proven they have no problem lying to us. They are not afraid of lying to us, they have done that for years.

It is the truth they are afraid of telling us, and they are terrified we will find out.

That sounds great, until you factor in socialist countries where big pharma is price capped and just about breaks even, or countries like China where the state owns everything and big pharma is a front to make it look like a free market economy.

This whole conspiracy narrative falls apart simply by crossing the border.

The government often lies to the American people, and works feverishly to keep some truths from us.

That is not a narrative or a conspiracy. It is the cold hard truth.

a reply to: carewemust

its a crime of the greatest magnitude

originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Grenade

Some people wont listen. Because they would trust whatever the MSM/Box says.

As apposed to trusting what the internet says?

Both are bad options.

a reply to: Grenade

It's scary to think people never question the box in the room that sends them messages all day long.

You mean the box that you look at all day while on the internet? Why do you trust that box so much?

Everything you think you know about covid came from the internet.

A healthy child/young adult has a greater risk of a vaccine side effect than risk of hospitalization from covid.

I am screwed I will not go that route with my son without a dang strong argument backed by data.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Remind me again why you trust Big Pharma like Pfizer? is it because they told its safe and effective with such fast study?

a reply to: scraedtosleep

You mean the box that you look at all day while on the internet

Are you supportive of Big Pharma?

a reply to: carewemust

Makes me wish we had a huge amount of kids here, so that we could perform all kinds of medical experiments on them.

Each child could receive 10 times the recommended dose of each Jibber-Jabber™ that is being used around the world, and even a few more for injecting 'fun' stuff into them, like horse-toothpaste, Glyphosate™, gin, muddy-water, Ice-9™, CBD, and any other fun thing we can think-of, to just stick-'em with.

Gotta Stick 'em all !!!

No child left behind !!!

Most folks should be 112% behind jabbing children, because anyone with a simple grain of intelligence knows, that life here on Earth would not be possible without Quackcines™.

In fact : if NOT for our saviors, the good humanitarians from Big-Pharma™ : no life would even exist on this planet !!

🚨🚨It's been officially approved by unanimous consent !!!!🚨🚨

I really hope they don't give kids expired vaccines.

Here is another Bitchute video (Vacine from Hell-SayNope) if anyone is interested.. has clips of adverse reactions. There are some infants in there.. absolutely horrifying what is happening. I found it difficult to watch. No way would I let them inject a kid.. I am wondering what the hell kind of doctor gave the vaxx to the children in the video.. were they offered up by their parents for the infant trials or what..Bloody hell

originally posted by: xuenchen
🚨🚨It's been officially approved by unanimous consent !!!!🚨🚨

All predetermined
Link

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: carewemust
My friend has had the jab and he informed me the other day that he is not putting his boys through it.
He told me his arm really hurt after the shot and the pain travelled across his chest and heart that lasted about 3 days.....it frightened him because of the myocarditis side effect reports.

I wonder how many high-level authorities in government and industry will allow their 5 to 11 year old children to be injected with these horrific drugs?

It would be interesting to see a graphic showing vaccination percentages based on OCCUPATION of the parents.

originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Itisnowagain

And you have the MSM lying to the people.
Pfizer Vax "Safe & Effective"

MSM

In their analysis, FDA scientists concluded that in almost every scenario the vaccine’s benefit for preventing hospitalizations and death from COVID-19 would outweigh any serious potential side effects in children. But agency reviewers stopped short of calling for Pfizer’s shot to be authorized.

They had being saying this for the past year now.

The latest trend in this era of Liberal lies and deceit, is to use words like "safe", "effective", "secure", "trustworthy", etc... without placing in the articles what statistics caused them to use those reassuring words.

When you look at the statistics you learn that the corrupt individuals were trying to pull a fast one on you.

For example, there was an Audit of the 2020 election in Wisconsin recently completed. Those who conducted the audit said the election was "Safe" and "Secure" and "Counted Accurately".

But when you look at the DATA/STATISTICS you see that over 7% of the cast ballots were not legal ballots. That amounted to 224,000 votes that should have been thrown out. Joe Biden beat Donald Trump by just 20,600 votes, out of 3.2 million cast. (Thankfully, smart authorities looked at the DATA/STATS, and are now identifying the illegal ballots, so we can see if Biden still won, or if Trump won Wisconsin.)