It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: dandandat2
It was going from the pole to the warehouse. Both are maybe a couple miles apart within the same facility.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: dandandat2
Open air, on a restricted facility, going maybe a mile or two, if that. By the time they got it covered, moved, uncovered and mounted, they just wasted a day of testing.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: 1947boomer
You should check the other thread out.
The model is presumed to be upside down on the trailer.
Also, not mentioned yet, AFAIK, there is a pylon mounted on the model that I guess would be where the model is attached to the pylon for testing. It is able to be seen in several of the photos.
The pylon is the same color as the model. It is aerodynamically designed, so maybe it was for wind tunnel testing?
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: 1947boomer
You should check the other thread out.
The model is presumed to be upside down on the trailer.
Also, not mentioned yet, AFAIK, there is a pylon mounted on the model that I guess would be where the model is attached to the pylon for testing. It is able to be seen in several of the photos.
The pylon is the same color as the model. It is aerodynamically designed, so maybe it was for wind tunnel testing?
OK, thanks. That’s making more sense.
With regard to the pylon; I saw it and commented on it, but assumed it was on the bottom of the airframe instead of the top. If the airframe is upside down on the trailer then that fixture would be positioned so as to present the unbroken bottom of the airframe to the radar for RCS testing, which would make more sense. Usually an aircraft in a wind tunnel test is held from the rear (often where the jet exhaust is) on a large cantilevered beam (called a sting). That’s because the air loads in a tunnel test can get quite large. I don’t think that pylon fixture is strong enough to take the air loads of a tunnel test.
Also, if it was upside down, the bulge behind the nose currently facing downward would actually be about where a cockpit should be.
Also if it was upside down, the place where the tail surfaces would attach would be hidden in this view and may simply not be attached yet.
All in all, a much more conventional sounding vehicle.
My comment about this not being a subsonic design still seems to make sense, because of the chine that goes around the perimeter of the airframe.
I looked for another thread and couldn’t find it. Can you point to it?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: 1947boomer
Three points in a triangle is also the best way to support the structure for transport. So they might just be for putting the supports for the truck while they move it.