The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court

a reply to: carewemust

This is why you don't use Twitter for news bro. That just means the petition has been recieved and entered.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: matafuchs

An affidavit that is substantiated by corroborating evidence is evidence.

On it's own, it's merely an

.

Commercial Estate career taught what you say regarding affidavits is not true.

Even daily logs were admissible in civil court, that was Georgia btw!

Several lawsuits were won on that most basic information which was not even at level of sworn affidavit.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: carewemust

This is why you don't use Twitter for news bro. That just means the petition has been recieved and entered.

Louisiana is filing also.

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: matafuchs

An affidavit that is substantiated by corroborating evidence is evidence.

On it's own, it's merely an assertion.
.

This is 100% wrong.

Affidavits are absolutely evidence. They are written testimony.
[SNIPPED]


I've been a lawyer almost 30 years.

I could be wrong.

But I'm not.

originally posted by: hiImBigbob
You have been saying a case wont even make it to SCOTUS.

And it hasn't. Have they accepted either of these petititions? Petitioning the Court does not equate to being heard by the Court.

This in a nutshell is what the Texas allow suit is about.

mobile.twitter.com...

It's not about fraud or cheating at the local levels.

Come on, Man!!!!!!
This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE political debate will be enforced.
Members must also Stay on Topic!!!
Trolling, And What To Do About It


Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

Terms And Conditions Of Use
Community Announcement re: Decorum

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.
This could include temporary POSTING BANS.



and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

a reply to: Snarl

Ben Swann does a 15 minute coverage of the lawsuit

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: carewemust

This is why you don't use Twitter for news bro. That just means the petition has been recieved and entered.

Louisiana is filing also.

mobile.twitter.com...

Are they? Looks to me like another BS twitter link being spammed all over ATS.

But hey, it might turn out to be true. If you post 1000 links a day, at least one would have to eventually turn out real.

The Supreme Court has rejected the smaller case against Pennsylvania.

Short and to-the-point.

mobile.twitter.com...


Let's see if they will accept Texas.

Fingers crossed!

originally posted by: FauxMulder

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: carewemust

This is why you don't use Twitter for news bro. That just means the petition has been recieved and entered.

Louisiana is filing also.

mobile.twitter.com...

Are they? Looks to me like another BS twitter link being spammed all over ATS.

But hey, it might turn out to be true. If you post 1000 links a day, at least one would have to eventually turn out real.

Maybe you will believe the Twitter Link I posted above this message?

originally posted by: FauxMulder

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: carewemust

This is why you don't use Twitter for news bro. That just means the petition has been recieved and entered.

Louisiana is filing also.

mobile.twitter.com...

Are they? Looks to me like another BS twitter link being spammed all over ATS.

But hey, it might turn out to be true. If you post 1000 links a day, at least one would have to eventually turn out real.

It just might be here is an article from Jeff Landry

agjefflandry.com...

Attorney General Jeff Landry's Statement On 2020 Federal Elections And Recent Texas Motion Before The Supreme Court

BATON ROUGE, LA - Attorney General Jeff Landry issued the following statement regarding the ongoing controversies over the 2020 federal election and the new motion put forward by the State of Texas before the U.S. Supreme Court:

“Millions of Louisiana citizens, and tens of millions of our fellow citizens in the country, have deep concerns regarding the conduct of the 2020 federal elections. Deeply rooted in these concerns is the fact that some states appear to have conducted their elections with a disregard to the U.S. Constitution.

a reply to: carewemust

That one has nothing to do with Louisiana and you said

Let's see if they will accept Texas.

So now you see that first one was bs.

originally posted by: hiImBigbob
LOL You have been wrong about everything up to now. You have been saying a case wont even make it to SCOTUS.

You were saying?

Supreme Court Rejects Republican Challenge to Pennsylvania Vote

a reply to: putnam6

This part would seem to indicate he's calling on them to consider texas case. If he was joining he would have said so. Perhaps he's waiting for it to be accepted or rejected.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: hiImBigbob
LOL You have been wrong about everything up to now. You have been saying a case wont even make it to SCOTUS.

You were saying?

Supreme Court Rejects Republican Challenge to Pennsylvania Vote

I like this blurb found in another article

Success in the law is based on using magic words. It really is. If you don’t use them, the court has no obligation to fix your pleadings. But if you know the spell, and you know how to cast it on paper, miracles can happen. Revolutionary arguments surface even when long-standing practices appear to have firm judicial support.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
This part would seem to indicate he's calling on them to consider texas case. If he was joining he would have said so. Perhaps he's waiting for it to be accepted or rejected.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments.

Now that Pennsylvania petition got tossed this one has not leg to stand on.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: putnam6

This part would seem to indicate he's calling on them to consider texas case. If he was joining he would have said so. Perhaps he's waiting for it to be accepted or rejected.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments.

All I am saying my friend is he might, the article is from him and he sounds like he agrees. I'm sure in Louisana it wouldn't hurt his political aspirations if he did so.