Rudy is a badass

a reply to: Gryphon66

Yeah, knock it off, we get it.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

I don't have to claim there's no evidence. You have to show the evidence to support your claim.

Here or there.

You haven't because you can't.

LIke the Trump et. al. attorneys, overwhelmingly, in every single court case thus far.

But, maybe next time ... eh?

/eyeroll

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yeah, knock it off, we get it.

There's zero evidence of that.

Typical.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

I don't have to claim there's no evidence. You have to show the evidence to support your claim.

Here or there.

You haven't because you can't.

LIke the Trump et. al. attorneys, overwhelmingly, in every single court case thus far.

But, maybe next time ... eh?

/eyeroll

On the link I posted to you, AZ GOP filed and won a lawsuit to get access to ballots, 2% of which were altered from Trump to Biden - that´s evidence.

-MM

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

I don't have to claim there's no evidence. You have to show the evidence to support your claim.

Here or there.

You haven't because you can't.

LIke the Trump et. al. attorneys, overwhelmingly, in every single court case thus far.

But, maybe next time ... eh?

/eyeroll

On the link I posted to you, AZ GOP filed and won a lawsuit to get access to ballots, 2% of which were altered from Trump to Biden - that´s evidence.

-MM

I see you don't understand.

They looked at 100 ballots. They claim there's 2% altered. They have not proven that.

They will get a chance tomorrow, as I understand it.

Next.

a reply to: Gryphon66

So you agree that it´s evidence. You just did now, you know, you just sad that they had to prove the evidence in the courts. Do you really know what evidence is in a civil court? I suspect not now.

-MM

a reply to: akiros

Political ones, not so much.

Politics are opinions. Nothing more.
Facts are not.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mandroid7

I confess.
I did not, nor will I, watch youtube videos presented as evidence. Of anything.

I have not farted for at least a week. Prove I'm wrong.

It's just an initial hearing. The guy interviewing Rudy is really loading his questions.
"Since you lost 29 lawsuits"...etc, etc

Rudy handles him like he should have.

The editing in fart noises is the crazy part here

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Gryphon66

So you agree that it´s evidence. You just did now, you know, you just sad that they had to prove the evidence in the courts. Do you really know what evidence is in a civil court? I suspect not now.

-MM

LOL. Why don't you quote what I actually said. Show me saying you have posted evidence, because I've repeatedly said the opposite.

You're starting to bore me. You apparently think either that semantic drivel you just posted is witty or you're realizing you have nothing of substance in your arguments.

Now, back to Rudy.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mandroid7


I have not farted for at least a week. Prove I'm wrong.

You fart every time you correct grammar mistakes.

a reply to: Phage

So factually, there has been election fraud. Why haven’t you answered my previous questions? Maybe because the answer; is like Rudy Giuliani, true and to the point.

So again I ask; explain to me the blatant fraud, I.e. rejection rate is MUCH lower this cycle than in 2016 with MILLIOMS more ballots added?

a reply to: Mandroid7

It's just an initial hearing.

No. It was a media "event."

a reply to: Gryphon66

Blah blah blah. You still have not explained why the AZ GOP won lawsuit which showed 2% of the ballots where altered from Trump to Biden is not evidence. Stop jumping around and answer my question please.

Also, show me a link where it states that affidavits are not considered evidence in a US civil court case. Please enlighten me.

-MM

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

You still have not explained why the AZ GOP won lawsuit which showed 2% of the ballots where altered from Trump to Biden is not evidence

Now all you have to do is demonstrate is that statistic applies to all of the unreadable ballots and that there are enough unreadable ballots to change the outcome.

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Gryphon66

Blah blah blah. You still have not explained why the AZ GOP won lawsuit which showed 2% of the ballots where altered from Trump to Biden is not evidence. Stop jumping around and answer my question please.

-MM

Rudy is a Badass is the nominal topic here. I've answered your other thread in that thread. Discuss it there.