Rudy is a badass

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

I’m happy for people like Rudy and all the testimonials, that have shown the complete illegal, unconstitutional and treasonous attempt to ruin this country. But it falls on deaf ears,

But they haven't. All they have done is made claim.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

For the record; I stand for this country and it’s freedom, not a ( left/right paradigm) I’ll never fall in that trap.

a reply to: Phage

Thanks for proving my point, Helen Keller

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

I can see.
I can hear.
I can speak.
And I can feel.



Mostly, I can think critically.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

I’m happy for people like Rudy and all the testimonials, that have shown the complete illegal, unconstitutional and treasonous attempt to ruin this country. But it falls on deaf ears,

But they haven't. All they have done is made claim.

Exactly. Claiming to have evidence and presenting it in a court of law are two very different things. The former is absolutely meaningless in this context.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

I responded to you with facts in your thread.

The leader of the AZ GOP has made unsubstantiated claims.

She'll get a chance tomorrow, as I understand it, to prove them in court.

Next?

Unsubstantiated by who?

a reply to: RazorV66

Unsubstantiated by who?

Whom.

But are you seriously asking for proof of a negative?

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

That´s just it, he refuses to tell the voters if he´s going to pack the Supreme Courts or not- like they have a right to know:
-"You´ll know my opinon on court packing the minute the election is over"
Biden

-MM

The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. Lawyers also have struggled to get what they say is evidence of fraud admitted into lawsuits, with judges dismissing it as inadmissible or unreliable.

That bastion of liberal thought the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

So, you've provided evidence that Biden has not claimed he will pack the courts?

Progress.

Now, can you back up your assertion that he will change the Constitution, or is that equally fallacious?

a reply to: RazorV66

Unsubstantiated by the claimant, unsubstantiated by the court, unsubstantiated by anyone who comprehends what the word means.

Do you have proof of her claims? SHow us.

a reply to: Phage

Critical thinking......... okay so using that; explain the testimonies of the witnesses across numerous states, how its false and how the rejection rate for mail in balllots is lower this election, even though they added millions more? Show me mathematically how that’s possible.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

So, you've provided evidence that Biden has not claimed he will pack the courts?

Progress.

Now, can you back up your assertion that he will change the Constitution, or is that equally fallacious?

You wen´t through my evidence thread I gave you (that you asked for BTW) in just 10 minutes? Just the OP video is more than 2 minutes long. Either you didn´t bother to read it, or you´re the fastest reader on ATS ever.

-MM

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

So, you've provided evidence that Biden has not claimed he will pack the courts?

Progress.

Now, can you back up your assertion that he will change the Constitution, or is that equally fallacious?

You wen´t through my evidence thread I gave you (that you asked for BTW) in just 10 minutes? Just the OP video is more than 2 minutes long. Either you didn´t bother to read it, or you´re the fastest reader on ATS ever.

-MM

I responded to your thread about an hour ago.

Next.

a reply to: Gryphon66

And how is that not evidence then as you claim?

-MM

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

explain the testimonies of the witnesses across numerous states,

In lieu of physical evidence and contrary to contrary testimony?
Confirmation bias. Cognitive dissonance. Lying, even.

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Gryphon66

And how is that not evidence then as you claim?

-MM

I'm not going to discuss the other thread here beyond what I already have. If you're unaware, that's against T&C.

However, in general, you and others post videos of people saying that things are true who are unable to substantiate that claim. Every attorney in every suit thus far has admitted, on the record that they have no evidence of voter fraud, and even, when put to the direct question by the court, are not claiming that fraud exists.

See above.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Gryphon66

And how is that not evidence then as you claim?

-MM

I'm not going to discuss the other thread here beyond what I already have. If you're unaware, that's against T&C.

However, in general, you and others post videos of people saying that things are true who are unable to substantiate that claim. Every attorney in every suit thus far has admitted, on the record that they have no evidence of voter fraud, and even, when put to the direct question by the court, are not claiming that fraud exists.

See above.

You´re the one that boldly claimed there´s no evidence in this very thread, I´m just inviting you to explain why.

-MM

Jesus, Can we be serious for a minute her guys?

The real question here is the fart noises.
Did we stumble onto the very first fart conspiracy?

Seriously, listen to the video.
Did someone intentionally cut the farts into this video?

1:20 in the video first fart...hold on I'm listening to the vid.
2:30 second fart
I will figure this out. Lol
It looks like the freakin media cut farts into the video.
Wow

Are some here really as ignorant of what evidence is as you seem to be?

Claimant: I have a tiny unicorn in this box.

Query: Show us the unicorn.

Claimant: I can't but it's in there.

Query: Can you show us any other unicorns?

Claimant: No, but I have one in this box.

ad infinitum.

Belief is not evidence. Statements are not evidence.