There is no actual evidence of voter fraud; here's how we know:

originally posted by: tanstaafl
If you can't see the difference between then, and now, there is no hope for you...

The fact that you think there's a difference is your problem.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: tanstaafl
"If you can't see the difference between then, and now, there is no hope for you..."

The fact that you think there's a difference is your problem.

Whatever, dude, you're pathetic.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Fascinating how can tell yourself that there are good politicians.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

Fascinating how can tell yourself that there are good politicians.

Quote me where I said any such thing.

ETA: I may have said it about one or two... but still. quote me...

a reply to: tanstaafl

I just told you the last 5 Presidents are trash, you disagreed.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Is this sort of personal abuse and insulting behaviour in breach of this site's T&C's?

a reply to: tanstaafl

If any disenfranchisement occurred, it was a direct result of the PA legislature violating their own Constitution, and the PA Supreme Court violating the Federal Constitution.

The word 'If' is doing all the lifting in your assertion.

Even 'IF' the procedure is declared unconstitutional AFTER the election, IT WILL NOT invalidate the results of THIS election. Everybody in the State voted under the same set of 'no excuse required' rules that were known and in effect for more than 12 months. Those voters will NOT be disenfranchised just because GOP, who put the rule into effect in order to skew the results to themselves (absentees historically favor Republican candidates) as well as reducing the number of in-person polling places, got gazumped by Trump's incompetent handling of the pandemic.

The extra time that they originally gave for mail to arrive is a different matter, but of lesser consequence. Because of Trump's lackey's attempt to subvert the Postal Service it wasn't clear that the USPS could actually meet the deadlines they have, in the past, manage to meet with no problems. So PA decided to allow an extra 3 days for the mail to arrive. That extra buffer is in doubt - and this puts something like 100 ballots in doubt. It needs to be worked out for future elections, I suppose, but those 100 ballots aren't going to make a difference to the result one way or another - in any race in the State. And there is just no way that they invalidate all the other ballots, mail-in or in-person.

a reply to: tanstaafl

So what's the deal now?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Big BA-DA-BOOM?

Heartiest congratulations to the OP, who called it right all the way to the finish line.

Not sure what to say to his opponents. It's pretty clear they will never abandon their delusions.

originally posted by: djz3ro
Big BA-DA-BOOM?

I'm sure you're going to hear how someone else will repackage this twice-denied petition and resubmit to the Court because this time, really, for serious, they'll take it.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl
I just told you the last 5 Presidents are trash, you disagreed.

No. I didn't. Try again...

a reply to: tanstaafl

Anything about the topic you want to cover? How about the Supreme Court and the 'fraud' stuff? How'd that work out?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

So what's the deal now?

Nice deflection. I proved you completely and totally wrong on all points - and all you can do is try to gloat - even though there is nothing to gloat over.

It's ok... you'll be able to go back to a nice, comfortable life of total obscurity and abject misery and isolation soon enough. Enjoy the basking glow of attention while you can.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
I proved you completely and totally wrong on all points...

You did? Hmmmmm. Aren't you the one who told me the Supreme Court was going to take this petition? I'm thinking they didn't....

a reply to: tanstaafl

The Supreme Court, no less, has proved you completely wrong.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: tanstaafl
"I proved you completely and totally wrong on all points..."

You did? Hmmmmm.

Of the comment in question? Yeppers.

I already admitted I was wrong about this one case being accepted, and after some reflection, figured out why I was wrong.

Maybe you should try it tome time.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Maybe you should try it tome time.

Maybe when I'm wrong about these cases I will. But so far, batting 1.000.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: tanstaafl

The Supreme Court, no less, has proved you completely wrong.

About the TX case? Yep, already admitted it, and noted where I went wrong.

But, it still isn't over. 1/20/21 is still weeks away.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
"originally posted by: tanstaafl
Maybe you should try it tome time."

Maybe when I'm wrong about this cases I will. But so far, batting 1.000.

So was President Al Gore - oh, wait...