It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fuhrman is a forensic and crime scene expert for Fox News, and he has been a frequent guest of Fox commentator Sean Hannity. .
4. (...describing use of deadly force in arrests).
"Where would this country be if every time a sheriff went out with a posse to find somebody who just robbed and killed a bunch of people, he stopped and talked to them first. To make sure they had guns. Tried to take them -- they shot them in the back. We still should be shooting people in the back. It's just that you've got to hire people who are capable of doing it. and capable of figuring out who the bad guys are."
5. (...explaining reasons he shoots to kill, regardless of department policy).
"And I don't want them to think I'm a coward. So sometimes that'll stimulate me to do what I have to do, and plus I like it when people are trying to hurt me, because there is something that is on the line, something that's important in my life, and I like working under pressure. And it's good. It feels good because I accomplish something. And you look around and say, most of these pukes couldn't do it. It's control, power, whatever you want to call it. But it's something that's inherent in only some people. I listen to liberals talk, and I can't believe that someone who is educated, or even just opens their eyes for one day can think what they think.
Q: What are some of the things that really annoy you when you hear liberals talk?
A: Do you people -- don't you shoot to wound'em? No, we shoot to kill'em. Now the department says we shoot to stop, not kill which is horse#. The only way you can stop somebody is to kill the son of a bitch. And what's the big deal? If you've got a reason to shoot somebody, you've got a reason to kill him."
9. (...Describing how police officers cover up the unlawful use of force).
But that gives a lot of credibility, when you've got a real heavy investigation. We had one. I had 66 allegations of brutality: AEW, under color of authority, assault and battery under color authority. Torture, all kinds of stuff. Two guys, well, there was four guys. Two of my buddies were shot and ambushed, policemen. Both alive and I was first unit on the scene. Four suspects ran into a 2nd story in a apartment projects -- apartment. We kicked the door done. We grabbed a girl that lived there, one of their girlfriends. Grabbed her by the hair and stuck a gun to her head, and used her as a barricade. Walked up and told them: `I've got this girl, I'll blow her #ing brains out, if you come out with a gun.' Held her like this -- threw the bitch down the stairs -- deadbolted the door -- Let's play, boys.
Q: Can we use that in the story?
A: It hasn't been 7 years. Statute of limitations. I have 300 and something pages internal affairs investigation just on that one incident. I got several other ones. I must have about 3000 or 4000 pages of internal affairs investigations out there. Anyway, we basically tortured them. There was 4 policemen, 4 guys.[...]
11. (...suggesting revenge against those who opposed used [sic] of police chokeholds).
Q: See, I still don't understand who promulgated or perpetrated it.
A: There was a black coalition in the south against police then. There is the ACLU, the NAACP . . . . The ACLU should be bombed, and everybody should be killed in it. They do no good. They are the cancer of society." (Tape No. 4 pp. 31; McKinny Transcript No. 4, p. 37)
originally posted by: Cosmocow
This guy is a total joke. And being hired by any media outlet is an ever bigger joke. This guy talked about how he contributed to everything wrong with law enforcement without any reprisals.
He spoke of bombing those not in support of chokehold tactics at the time, he spoke about shooting suspects in the back, he talked about his 66 allegations of police brutality, yet the media only reported his use of the N word.
Mark Fuhrman is an example of systematic racism being acceptable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is f%#$ing discusting!
How does Fox and Hannity get away with using this guy?