It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
More at: www.washingtonexaminer.com...
U.S. Attorney John Durham interviewed former CIA Director John Brennan for eight hours on Friday, as he wraps up his inquiry into the Russia investigation, according to a statement on behalf of the Obama administration intelligence chief.
Getting ahead of whatever report the federal prosecutor is expected to release, which President Trump and his allies believe will be a damning assessment of the actions taken by top intelligence and national security officials taken against Trump's campaign and administration, Brennan also declared he confronted Durham about the politicization of his efforts.
A statement from Nick Shapiro, Brennan's former deputy chief of staff and senior adviser, also claimed the former CIA director was told he is not under criminal investigation.
They met at CIA headquarters and discussed "issues related to Russia’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Shapiro said, adding that Durham informed Brennan that “he is not a subject or a target of a criminal investigation, and that he is only a witness to events that are under review."
The statement, which was first obtained by Politico, said, “Brennan welcomed the opportunity to answer Mr. Durham’s questions related to a wide range of intelligence-related activities undertaken by CIA before the 2016 presidential election as well as the Intelligence Community Assessment published in early January 2017."
originally posted by: MrEnergy
Brennan was just exposed on the shadow gate video to have been involved in creating a back door into the NSA’s 72 hour holding of data, and selling said data to whomever. His spying should be investigated, not his spying in this one particular incindence.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: aeroscrog
Your wise words reminded me that just 2 weeks ago, John Brennan's attorney said there was no indication that his client would be interviewed by John Durham.
originally posted by: aeroscrog
a reply to: carewemust
Thank you! Fantastic well written article by someone that appears to have high level experience in both legal and psychiatric fields.