Why pick this now, you don't believe well let me ask you this have YOU ever studied those skull's in person or taken measurement's of there cranial
capacity, I suspect not and if I am right then YOU know no better than we do.
You will use debunking pages to prove your point and we can of course bring in our pages which you will then discredit setting of a reciprocal
sequence of argument and counter argument's, we will simply give up usually not because we think you are right but because you seem to love to debunk
and will go on and on and on only resting your point when and if YOU believe you have given a damning blow to those that disagree with you.
Odd thing that if the finding are acceptable then there is no need for more tests (so you don't see accepted result's being retested again and again
until they fit the perceived criteria instead of being the odd one out) but because the establishment did not like the DNA result's from those Paracas
skull's they then demanded another DNA test and probably another, remind you of anything - like the star child skull as in that case the original DNA
results did not please the establishment and it would not go away or be brushed under the carpet UNTIL it's backer DIED and it faded away conveniently
allowing them to then produce BUNK DNA result's that then went unchallenged since Mr Pye was no longer there to take legal action against there
DEBUNKING 'claim' which no doubt he WOULD HAVE since he owned the artifact (though technically it probably was property of a native tribe - another
convenient way to hide evidence by the way - and probably was just a child with hydrocephalus - results can be skewed through microbial and other
contamination though we have gotten pretty good at screening that these day's, nevertheless the dirty trick's were flying there and such debunkers
love to hide thing's when they are not going there way - JUST like the guy whom was seen with an IRON BAR near the Paloxy track's before the human
footprint's there were vandalized - took his sweet time before he produced his own counter statement and only did so because too many people believe
he did ruin them).
Though Pye was probably not offed and his cancer was probably natural I also can not but liken the case 'in part' to how Schneider was MURDERED for
continuing to push his claim's of alien bases - to the point were even though death scene photo's show defense wound's on his hand's and a ligature
around his neck his death was claimed natural causes - yeah natural causes he just happened to have fought with all his might against himself while he
was strangled by NATURAL CAUSES (Whoever the hell that creep is) eh?, since his death his debunker's can say anything they want AND the same with Ron
Wyatt, since his death creep's and liars have come out of the woodwork trying to blacken and discredit him because of the ark of the covenant which is
probably still in the Grotto of Jeremiah in Jerusalem RIGHT beneath an area were he found three post holes of the type used to mount Crucifixions in
front of a skull like rock face which he believed to be Golgotha and I concur with him on that, the crack in the rock ran right through the center
cross/square post hole which had a roman coin in it when Mr Wyatt excavated it - a coin from the first century, that entire area with the three square
post holes for crucifixions was then bulldozed by the Israeli authority's to hide it - too much proof Jesus is real for some of them and the
established church's did not put up any fight because there shrines' established in the much later Byzantine period are already too well
established.
You know what DEBUNK or try too all you want, sometimes you are bang on correct and then I and a great many other's are grateful when you correct us
if we go wrong but other time's? (and I suspect this is most certainly one of those OTHER time's), personally I am more inclined to take the word of
people that have looked at those skull's in person and measured them.
It say's it in the video I linked if you wish to watch, admittedly they seem to have mixed up .25 larger with 2.5 larger for some reason, the brain's
were larger than average but not the monster huge that 2.5 time's larger would make them just somewhere between 20 to 25 percent larger (Sorry you can
do your own math but for other's - so between a fifth and a quarter larger than average - not incredibly out of bound's there are people with much
larger brains today than that) - still makes them bigger than other brains of the period and region but not as I say bigger than some of today's human
brain's in non elongated ordinary modern human skull's and of course that could also be explained through diet as well as localized genetic anomaly's
- though we can not argue this due to the PC crowd there were plenty of studies on ethnic brain size differences in the past - though as I would point
out many of those result's were probably due to diet.
Even between nations today populations often have different head shapes (I am not getting into crackpot phrenology here) - in fact even in Europe the
Swiss are notable for having rounder head's according to something I once read, if you believe Karen Hudes (and yes I do think she is a bit - you
know? but just maybe while some of her ideas are distinctly off piste she may have some truth in what she say's or then again maybe not when a
brilliant person goes off the rail's they really go off them) then there are some people in the banking institutions with HUGE heads' but hey guess
what people all across society range in size both bodily and in the proportion's of there body part's, some have larger head's.
As I point out thought if there DNA - and it was the Mitochondrial DNA they were talking about which is as you know the maternal line and these
cytoblasts are past down that line - showed differences, it may mean they were a remnant of another race of man - OR a failed offshoot and parallel
evolution that was out competed and ultimately went the way of the proverbial dodo.
BUT I agree elongated skull's - even possibly naturally formed ones are NOT proof or even indication of Alien's, they are however interesting and may
point to any number of possible lost offshoots of the human family that may have come close but failed to win the race - which I strongly suspect is
still ongoing - in the development of mankind.
edit on 1-5-2020 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)