This topic is in the Regional Politics discussion forum.  (rss)


Clinton vs. Rice 2008




Topic started on 12-3-2005 @ 09:52 AM by 00PS


Matt Drudge will have a field day in 2007 with an all women's lineup for the oval office. March 12th Washington Times exposes Rice's stance on Abortion and her Bid for the whitehouse. Although not officially annoucned, Rice is the only contender that would be able to Battle Hillary for the Whitehouse.

While the U.S. does have a tendancy of changing roles of politicians in the past such as Ventura and Scwarzzenager (??) It is seemingly time to push the aspect of women in politics on the public.


Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday pointedly declined to rule out running for president in 2008, and gave her most detailed explanation of a "mildly pro-choice" stance on abortion.
In an interview with editors and reporters in the office of the editor in chief at The Washington Times, she said she would not want the government "forcing its views" on abortion.
She seemed bemused by speculation that a Rice candidacy could set up an unprecedented all-woman matchup with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, who is widely expected to seek the presidency.



QUESTION: Will it be a White Women first or a Black Women first >

EDIT: Title change and some offensive language.

[edit on 4/10/2005 by cmdrkeenkid]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-3-2005 @ 07:09 PM by Carseller4


Yeah, it's cool to be a racist, but only if you are a democrat. The Blackhouse, real classy



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2005 @ 01:25 AM by HALLOWEEN78


Blackhouse? Ha ha, how do libs get away with stuff like that, and the conservatives get crucified?

I believe that Rice will win. Not only is she smarter than Hillary, but she'll also get a fare chunk of the black vote.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-4-2005 @ 08:24 PM by Carseller4


Yeah so much for the tolerent left.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-4-2005 @ 04:49 AM by OXmanK


If you think she will get that nice "chunk of the black vote", you are kidding yourself. That's like saying Hillary will get her fair share of the white vote. Anyhow, I think many African Americans view "black Republicans" as an Uncle Tom. However unfair a stigma it is.

Besides, Giuliani will get the nod. And I wouldn't call Hillary the nod for the Dems yet, either.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-4-2005 @ 11:43 AM by Otts


No generalizations, please. I'm a lib and I'm not a fan of that "Blackhouse" word pun.

It won't be Rice or Giuliani. We all know that Republicans' idea of democracy is to draft Jeb Bush in 2008, as a prelude to George P. Bush in 2016... and the first woman President, Jenna Bush, in 2024.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-4-2005 @ 09:42 PM by cmdrkeenkid


Who's really to say that either of them to run, really. Just about anyone, either democrat or republican, could be in the running.

Though I would, unfortunately, have to say Hillary would stand over Rice. Hillary could play off the past and use it to her advantage, as well as slander Rice with the failures of the G.W. Bush era.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.067 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread