Flat Earther "Mad" Mike Hughes dies in crash of homemade rocket

Nvm.

originally posted by: firerescue

Nobody on Earth has ever seen or filmed a rocket, flying any higher than airplanes.

a reply to: turbonium1

LADE launch from NASA Mid Atlantic Range - Wallops Island Virginia

www.youtube.com...


I can actually view night launches as travel up coast


Any more stupid utterances ………??

Other than the one above? I hope not.

Again, we see a rocket for about 3 minutes, when they stop the footage, while the rocket is still visible. Why would anyone do that, for such an event? No reason, they just stop filming it, right? Sure, they got about three minutes, good enough!


Where would you say the rocket is, when last seen in the video?

Let's say it is 500 miles from the launch site, or 600 miles, if you prefer.

And they know it's path, beforehand, of course.

So please explain why they never told us, or showed us, what the flight path of the rocket was going to be, when we could go out to see it the next day, or week? Why do they show the flight path over the ocean after it has already launched?
Because nobody can go out and see it by that point, and you know it.

Another rocket flying over the ocean, for three minutes, and they stop showing it, same as always. Thanks a lot.

One more time to ask why they haven't filmed it from a ship, which you won't answer, like everyone else here. After they don't tell us where to see a rocket from Earth, except at the launch site, you won't say they have no reason not to tell us, because there IS a reason, they don't tell us, and you'll never admit it. Keep believing their lies, that they have no secrets, that they don't need to tell us where to see a rocket from Earth, because they always TELL us where it goes, and that's good enough for you!

I've told you where they keep secrets from us, and if you ignore that fact, at least you know it, whether or not you admit it, is up to you. One day, I hope you come to realize that accepting the truth, no matter what others say, is far, far better, than holding on to their despicable lies, and deceit

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: turbonium1

Seeing a rocket launch and fly for three minutes, is not what I'm talking about here. Everyone has seen that.

Nobody has ever seen a rocket AFTER that point, that's the problem.

Perhaps you haven't but you can't speak for everyone , take 7 minutes to watch this rocket go from launch pad to space uninterrupted.

There are many reasons we know the Earth is round this is just one of them.

Funny your post got ignored. And it’s conveniently pushed off the leading page.

Funny flat earthers never have an answer for the very real data and very real transmissions which can be triangulated originating from man made objects from space,

Funny flat earthers never have an answer for the “new” additions to the permanent Firmament which have been popping up over the last hundred years. And ignoring the man made objects orbiting the planet which are visible from earth.

a reply to: turbonium1
you're obsessed with seeing a rocket but too lazy to show and edge.

YOU can get in a boat and get out to sea and watch the rocket use a lens and film it for miles - WHY Don't you?

Is it because you world would be shattered if the CGI you accuse everyone of showing you what you asked for will turn out not to be CGI.

You need to step up and find the edge become a hero, come on go look for the edge

originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: turbonium1
you're obsessed with seeing a rocket but too lazy to show and edge.

YOU can get in a boat and get out to sea and watch the rocket use a lens and film it for miles - WHY Don't you?

The fact nobody has ever filmed it from the ocean isn't because nobody wants to film it from the ocean, in case you don't know that, or - more likely - you try to ignore that fact.

Why have we never gone out to sea, and filmed a rocket, anytime?

Because we don't know WHERE to see them from Earth, since they do NOT tell us where to see them, afterwards! If they DID tell us, we could go out to sea, along the path of a rocket, beforehand, to see it above the ocean, where we are in boats, and ships!!

How could we know where to sail, and see a rocket, unless we know the actual path it's expected to travel, beforehand? By a lucky guess?

If they know where it's path is, beforehand, then why don't they ever tell us?

a reply to: turbonium1

I don’t have film of you. So you obviously don’t exist. Bye bye figment.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: turbonium1

Seeing a rocket launch and fly for three minutes, is not what I'm talking about here. Everyone has seen that.

Nobody has ever seen a rocket AFTER that point, that's the problem.

Perhaps you haven't but you can't speak for everyone , take 7 minutes to watch this rocket go from launch pad to space uninterrupted.

There are many reasons we know the Earth is round this is just one of them.

Funny your post got ignored. And it’s conveniently pushed off the leading page.

Funny flat earthers never have an answer for the very real data and very real transmissions which can be triangulated originating from man made objects from space,

Funny flat earthers never have an answer for the “new” additions to the permanent Firmament which have been popping up over the last hundred years. And ignoring the man made objects orbiting the planet which are visible from earth.

The funniest part of all is when the 'rocket' shows Earth as a ball, by 1:43 after launching, while all of the rockets we see, and film, from Earth, are below cruising altitude, THREE minutes after launch!!

Rockets will often show Earth as a ball, within two minutes, only when nobody else can see it, or film it, from Earth!!

Not like all of the OTHER rockets, which we see from Earth!


If they showed a rocket for over three minutes, at very least, and then showed Earth as a ball, below it, at least it would match up to what we see from Earth, after three minutes, but they showed Earth as a ball, below a rocket, in less than TWO minutes......!!!!


You really believed it supported your claim, same as others have thought, when showing similar videos, of a rocket, with Earth below it, as a ball....

If you understand a rocket seen from Earth, filmed from Earth, is still flying airplane altitudes, after three minutes, why would you believe that a rocket can show Earth below it, as a ball, from 'space', in under TWO minutes?

They lie and lie about space, about rockets, about Earth as a ball. Mistakes are inevitable in trying to hold up so many lies, at the same time.

Claiming a rocket flies into 'space', into 'orbit', is showing a rocket launch from Earth, and fly away, out of sight, and that's it.

Explain that a rocket has to fly once around Earth, not 'straight up', because it must gain speed, so much speed, before it can 'break free' of Earth's 'gravity'!

When a rocket has flown three minutes at airplane altitudes, that's always been their explanation. And still is.

It's obvious to see, from these videos, it is a lie, and it has always been a lie.

Claiming a rocket flies around Earth once, before going into 'space', is a clever excuse, and most people still buy it.

But now, they've really goofed up. Making videos with rockets showing Earth below them, in less than TWO minutes, after launch, was a massive blunder, which proves it is an absolute fake.

a reply to: turbonium1

And again. You create a false argument when it has been repeatedly explained to you. And you ignore all the man made objects that have been added to your permanent firmament that can be seen with the naked eye. Or triangulated to determine height and location in orbit by their active data transmissions providing real live services.

But keep throwing your intellectual temper tantrums. It just further kills your credibility.

And still no video of your existence. So your just a CGI mock-up? Not real yourself. See how there is absolutely no logic to your false argument concerning video. Especially when people have posted video you asked for. Concerning launches that placed real objects into space. Some that can be seen at night in the night sky with the naked eye. Most can be verified by the services they provide, and their active transmissions. Changes to the permanent firmament you provide no answers for.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

And again. You create a false argument when it has been repeatedly explained to you. And you ignore all the man made objects that have been added to your permanent firmament that can be seen with the naked eye. Or triangulated to determine height and location in orbit by their active data transmissions providing real live services.

But keep throwing your intellectual temper tantrums. It just further kills your credibility.

And still no video of your existence. So your just a CGI mock-up? Not real yourself. See how there is absolutely no logic to your false argument concerning video. Especially when people have posted video you asked for. Concerning launches that placed real objects into space. Some that can be seen at night in the night sky with the naked eye. Most can be verified by the services they provide, and their active transmissions. Changes to the permanent firmament you provide no answers for.

Seeing a rocket from Earth actually fly above Earth, and appear as a speck, after launch, is proof.

This cannot be faked. So it would prove your claim is true.

Anything else in an illusion, a fake, a trick. That's why they tell us where to see them in 'orbit' as a light in the dark sky, and never tell us where to see an actual rocket fly around Earth, BEFORE that.

Knowing that they have never told us where to see a rocket after seeing it at the launch site, why would you believe anything else they claim is true?

a reply to: turbonium1

What are the new objects populating and changing your unchanging and permanent firmament, and broadcasting data back to earth.

Again...

And still no video of your existence. So your just a CGI mock-up? Not real yourself. See how there is absolutely no logic to your false argument concerning video. Especially when people have posted video you asked for. Concerning launches that placed real objects into space. Some that can be seen at night in the night sky with the naked eye. Most can be verified by the services they provide, and their active transmissions. Changes to the permanent firmament you provide no answers for.

a reply to: turbonium1

You

Anything else in an illusion, a fake, a trick

You mean like actual man made objects orbiting the earth?

Actual man made objects fly above Earth, the illusion is that they fly into 'orbit', or 'space'.


When you cannot answer my question, why do you still believe all the rest is true?

a reply to: turbonium1

There are items in geostationary orbit who’s transmissions allow them to be located precisely by triangulation. Never mind space probes actively transmitting from beyond orbit.

With no reason to lie about the actual nature of the Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and so on....

With items like distance stars, pulsars, and quasars that can be located by their emitted radiation.

I find it funny that you credit and limit your little g god’s ability to only making a fishbowl. While the God I have faith in is not boxed in by my belief, and is the creator of a vast universe. A creator of a living, changing, and expanding universe.

If the firmament is permanent. Why do novas come and go? Where do meteorites come from. How could man kind add any “trick” to the firmament if it is permanent and unchanging.

a reply to: turbonium1

Sorry. The universe is bigger than the flat earth lies you push. And you are not the center of the universe.

a reply to: turbonium1

Morning Turdonium1 how's you doing found the Edge yet?

You could be so right about rockets and the lies we're are being told BUT only if you could find the Edge.

So step up and show the Edge, go out and get a picture - can't use gps so you'll need a map to show where the edge ice wall is to be validated.

Where's the Edge?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: BrianFlanders

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: BrianFlanders
I find it pretty hard to have any sympathy for people like that. This was just dumb.

Why did people have sympathy for the dare-devil Evil Knievel

I didn't.

As a kid I remember Evel Knievel stunts being carried on the Nightly News.

Evol Knievel was awesome.
I've broken and sprained a few joints and bones trying to live up to that standard when I was a kid...maybe a little beyond that.
The jumping a pickup truck in a go kart didn't go particularly well.