I was just banned from Google Youtube 4 watching the 2nd Amendement March

a reply to: seeker1963

So are there people at the rally with firearms?
If YouTube doesn't allow videos of firearms, then someone posts one, and it gets taken down, what can you really say? It's just T&C.

originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: seeker1963

So are there people at the rally with firearms?
If YouTube doesn't allow videos of firearms, then someone posts one, and it gets taken down, what can you really say? It's just T&C.

then news should be banned as well. see men with guns all the time. The TnC dont aply IF you are a huge corporation which is DISCRIMINATION and breaking their OWN RULES. I smell class action law suit from ACLU incoming.

Considering I've seen plenty of "Kill whitey/honky, N#s gonna n#, Rape the women" and all manner of crap from KAG to MAGA to SMAF (shorthand for "suck my ass, foreigners", new one that seems to be gaining steam) etc etc etc all over the damn site's chat boxes, I think you're being extremely dishonest about why you were banned. "KAG" didn't do it.

In short, prove it. Your claim does not add up to even normal Youtube chat box troll MOS s# they get away with and avoid bans from.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire

Neither has anything to do with ''human'' or ''American'' rights, only corporate rights. If we laud the system of capitalism over socialism,or for that matter any other economic system, then we must accept that corporate right to do what ever the hell they want.

YouTube banning or reeducation camps...hmmm I'll go with the YouTube banning...

a reply to: Nyiah

Plus there are hundreds of gun channels, people who compete or just normal gun videos by a bunch of gun enthusiasts..

I know cuz I subscribe to a few

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: Nyiah

Plus there are hundreds of gun channels, people who compete or just normal gun videos by a bunch of gun enthusiasts..

I know cuz I subscribe to a few

Yeah, my husband subs to several of them too, YT is not wantonly banning their gun channels consciously. Whatever slips through their automated reporting system's cracks does, though. And it happens to ANY kind of channel. I've had a crochet channel completely disappear on me because some douchebag reported it (crocheters suspect a competitor channel was responsible) There was nothing offensive in that channel's video list, but it poofed anyway. Same with one of my older daughter's art channels, a video she saved of sketching materials she was interested in disappeared, and was not removed by the channel. Suffice it to say, it's not a conspiracy against the gun folks, they're not that f#g special. it's their automated system, it still needs work. Better than it was when they first implemented it, but still need a LOT of work to stop netting the innocent.

In 1995 or so, LA news was following a cop chase which was also making national news, interrupting afternoon cartoons for kids on many local stations. The person being followed by police stopped his car on the freeway, pulled out a gun and blew his brains out all over the car. On national news, live, while kids where waiting for Pokemon to come back on. Fallout was huge, live broadcast suicide.
Now we have thousands (at last report) of armed individuals gathered in a small location, exercising multiple rights, like bear arms and assembly. 17 live streams being throttled or plain cutoff broadcasting this event. You want to know the real reason why? Not conspiracy, not oppression. The potential of a live broadcast mass shooting. If someone accidentally fires off a round, if unarmed protesters show up, tempers get heated....No company, and I mean all right and left wing providers alike, is willing to broadcast an event where death and violence is the potential outcome. Now I am not saying it will happen, very small chance actually, but if it does...and you where the person/folks responsible for streaming that live? Backlash would be a light term for what would happen. Don't think gun lobbyists are thinking the same thing? Then ask the NRA why they are not live streaming the largest pro-gun rally in history....

originally posted by: Gothar
Don't think gun lobbyists are thinking the same thing? Then ask the NRA why they are not live streaming the largest pro-gun rally in history....

If the NRA's not even bothering, then you make a very good point here. You'd think a group the hardliners cling to as next to godliness would be live streaming. If they're not, it says something pretty big there.

a reply to: Violater1

Banned for spamming would be a better thread title.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Violater1

Banned for spamming would be a better thread title.

For your next thread, sure.
We all know that you were not over my shoulder.
I suppose those channels that were banned right along with me were spamming too.
Now run along and get your next comment from Frau Pelosi.

a reply to: Violater1

True story, I was watching CNN and caught the story, violater1 banned for spamming youtube, then it cut to some ad for Bernie.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

was suspicious in my first reply. been watching this all day on youtube and im not banned. must have broken the t&c to get booted off there

a reply to: JaqitchHgar

Yep, I suspect op has bought tickets for the conservative persecution movement.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: seeker1963

So are there people at the rally with firearms?
If YouTube doesn't allow videos of firearms, then someone posts one, and it gets taken down, what can you really say? It's just T&C.

then news should be banned as well. see men with guns all the time. The TnC dont aply IF you are a huge corporation which is DISCRIMINATION and breaking their OWN RULES. I smell class action law suit from ACLU incoming.

Does "the news" have no firearm policy?

Hell, Im not even sure why youtube says no firearms, there are definitely firearm related channels..maybe they are classified educational?

a reply to: Violater1

Just a suggestion, perhaps try wearing pants next time?

It was a tough rally to watch, especially as the numbers built up and a lot channels got jammed. This is common when large crowds are present and the cell towers get overwhelmed. One Youtube channel that done a great job in the situation was Pete Santilli1

🚨LIVE TEAM COVERAGE: VIRGINIA 2A RALLY 🚨


Overall it was a great protest. There was a heap of fear porn in the lead up to the event. In such a well armed crowd any shooters would of had a quick suicide. The main threat of any crazed shooters were from government back forces with another false flag event. Good there was none of that with a strong message for the Governor to resign.

As for getting banned off Youtube, try looking at other video platforms like dlive.tv banned.video bitchute.com drop.space and brighteon.com

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Point taken Occam.

a reply to: Violater1

It sounds like you were spamming. Others had no trouble. Or am I reading this wrong?

Tech companies are extremely liberal left leaning.

My buddy was working on some weird algorithms they would hide certain ideas and videos.

If you were to post a conservative video there are ways to make it only seen by you and no one else.

Wonder why your not getting replies, it may look like your video is there for everyone to see

I did the several times within the allotted time frame.

In every sense of the word.

Spammer!