It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Yet more liberal BS propganda from an america hater.
.....Liberalism a mental disorder!
Sweetie - the article is about a compilation of demographic studies from a
variety of sources, many business generated.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Sweetie - the article is about a compilation of demographic studies from a
variety of sources, many business generated.
That's the thing. It isn't. Nothing you posted was a demographic.
None of this information would be useful to a business.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
That was one piece of information. One. How exactly does the World Health Organization help businesses?
Writers collect information from a variety of sources. The article and book cited above are both compilations - you need check the source to find out who did what particular study. We know Global Finance was used as a source.
The WHO collects info worldwide. Anyone has a right to access and use that info as they wish. WHO stats are widely used
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
The WHO collects info worldwide. Anyone has a right to access and use that info as they wish. WHO stats are widely used
They don't collect information for businesses. They don't do demographics for corporations.
Corporations can and do access and use the WHO's information. ...You might check out this thread if you are honestly trying to understand the relationships between the health, credit and banking industries:
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
And I believe I already asked why this business about demographics has only come up pages into the topic, and nothing like it was said in your original post.
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
Trying to grasp (yet again) the 'jest' of this thread:
Demographic studies are widely used, ergo important. Business uses these studies and reports made from them
I think this is the thread.
Based upon this assumption I still maintain that demographics are nothing more than a tool.
While a very widely used tool, one nonetheless. Demographically where is America? That is too broad a question. Demographics are comparative- something must be compared to something else. This is the major flaw in demo-studies.
Until Europe socially and culturally has the societal avenues available to people that get the spark no matter what these studies show America will hold a doorway no other country holds.
In the long run these demographic studies will end up in the waste can or buried in some file cabinet behind corporate reports that were used to justify one thing or the other.
Unless corporatism grabs a substantially larger share of the American economy than it presently holds America will continue to be what it has in its past. Nothing Europe, Asia or any other part of the globe can do about it.
.
Originally posted by soficrow
. . . if you're deciding where to set up shop to publish scientific research - or a laboratory, for example. You go where the action is. That's the purpose of comparative demographics.
JoeDoaks
Until Europe socially and culturally has the societal avenues available to people that get the spark no matter what these studies show America will hold a doorway no other country holds.
Absolutely. We have anti-class action legislation, allow predatory financial marketing and disallow comprehensive personal bankruptcy, provide corporate loopholes for taxation and let the little guys carry the burden, and the list goes on.
America is corporate heaven, no doubt about it. Quite an edge.
IMO - corporations already own and run America. And the world is not about nation competing against nation. "Nations" are just markets and corporations run the world. Well, wherever and whatever they can get away with.
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
sofi says America is corporate heaven.
While this is your perception I don't believe it. America is the land of small business. There has never been a time in America where big business employed half as many people as small business.
Above, sofi, you state America is a corporate heaven and therefore has an edge- yet in another post (or two) you decry that 49 of 50 'top companies' are not American. Is there a little duplicity here?
To your example of research facilities- why this is beyond me. Research facilities rely on no road grid, no access to anything of any magnitude.
Originally posted by soficrow
Europe is now the place to be in science - and that's where the big investment dollars go. ...The best the US has to offer is a deregulated climate - but it's not enough apparently.
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
Originally posted by soficrow
Europe is now the place to be in science - and that's where the big investment dollars go. ...The best the US has to offer is a deregulated climate - but it's not enough apparently.
This may be true, I haven't looked into it. In bio-chem I have no doubt. When (not if) Europeans finally decide DNA created humans has gone too far the research will move to another place.
All this number #1, 22, 49 . . . stuff is bogus anyway.
There is one American product the rest of the world can't touch- grains.
In addition to eliminating hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs (Scott and Rothstein 1997), NAFTA has also initiated tremendous structural changes in all three member countries (EPI et al 1997). For example, the U.S. trade surplus in agricultural products has declined sharply with Mexico, and has turned into a deficit with Canada. However, changes in the trade balance mask even larger changes in the structure of agriculture. Some U.S. producers of corn and cattle have profited, as have all the major grain trading companies, while Canadian Dairy farms, US farmers growing wheat, barley, fruits and vegetables, and Mexican corn producers have all suffered catastrophic losses (Scott 1999b).
Source
It doesn't matter who produces the most steel or makes the most cars- what matters is who BUYS the most.
Reaganomics were proven wrong and are still wrong. Demand drives wealth, not supply.
.
Originally posted by soficrow
...But viewing the US as a primarily consumer market - with a high rate of unemployment and debt, which exports both labor and professional jobs leaving only a service sector for employment - how long do you really think the demand will remain attractive for anything but basic necessities?
. . . - the US market is being played as a demand market, not a supply market - and consumers are being 'indentured' to credit in order to create long term 'bread and butter' income for global financiers. .....Stable from the perspective of lenders, but pretty bleak from the other side of the fence, dontcha think?
The Economist
How can one country simulataneously cause both Deflation and Inflation? The source of Deflation is due in large part to the labor arbitrage China has engendered, along with a commensurate extremely low cost production of goods. Call it the Wal-Mart effect. Inflation is simply due to the insatiable appetite China has for raw materials, as they industrialize what was a mostly agricultural nation of 2 Billion people (2010 projected, present: 1,298,847,624) into an industrial power house.
China grain
China's grain prices will remain basically stable this year, although the overall price level is expected to be higher than that of last year.
There is little possibility that the grain price will experience major fluctuations, and grain demand will remain stable this year.
If demand grows at an annual rate of 0.8 percent, China will require 494 billion kilograms of grain this year.
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
Originally posted by soficrow
...But viewing the US as a primarily consumer market - with a high rate of unemployment and debt, which exports both labor and professional jobs leaving only a service sector for employment - how long do you really think the demand will remain attractive for anything but basic necessities?
. . . - the US market is being played as a demand market, not a supply market - and consumers are being 'indentured' to credit in order to create long term 'bread and butter' income for global financiers. .....Stable from the perspective of lenders, but pretty bleak from the other side of the fence, dontcha think?
I like that. I feel this is what is happening. the recent changes in the bankruptcy law echo this sentiment.
You like demographics, find some on lending policies.
Banks only need about 1 1/2% difference between what they pay and what they lend to make a huge profit in a stable market, yet now we have 5% spread.
Why is that?
How can insurance companies break even or even lose a little on annuities yet end up making fortunes?
If demand grows at an annual rate of 0.8 percent, China will require 494 billion kilograms of grain this year. ...What's the 'demographics' of a crop failure in China?
Nothing is ever what it seems
Originally posted by soficrow
. . . where do we go from here? How do we turn a service economy/consumer market back into a production economy?
Originally posted by soficrow
Not sure where to look. ...? Got any key words?
Originally posted by soficrow
Can you explain what this means in simple terms?
Originally posted by soficrow
I confess. I don't have a clue what you're talking about here. (Have flu. Still braindead. Don't have the background anyway.) Could you please explain? Walk me through it step by step?
.
Originally posted by ServoHahn
Please excuse me if these issues have already been discussed in the thread (I joined late and currently do not have enough time to read it all, bad form, I know),
1. Don't let people on to the medical care problem, I was against it too until I became pre-med :-p and
P.S. Joe, you've stolen the heck out of this post. Bravo, you'll make a good president... or assassinated conspiracy theorist one day. I'll vote for you.