It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: queenofswords
I wonder if "These people are sick" means the entities that took over the bodies are being rejected - much like a transplant?
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Trillium
I wonder if that is the "someone BIG" 40Head was talking about.
On December 13, the Rivne Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal filed by the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau Artem Sytnik and found him guilty of illegal benefits - free resting in elite hunting grounds of the Polissye-Sarny farm in Rivne region. Now, according to the acting legal norms law, he should be dismissed by President Zelensky or the Verkhovna Rada.
By law, Sytnik now has three options. The first is that President Zelensky will dismiss him. The second is that he will be dismissed after decision of parliament, where Volodymyr Zelensky's party "Servant of the People" has a majority. The third - Sytnyk can write a letter of resignation and save the face.
To be fair Trump does take a salary as its required, but he donates it. Just want to make sure facts are clear before someone else comments calling you a liar or something. So he is technically still "employed" by this corporation that is a subsidiary of the U.N.
originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: dashen
#metoo
BREAKIN G NEWS: Judiciary Committee Democrats APPROVE two articles of impeachment
Two articles passed on party-line votes of 23 to 17
You cannt make this stuff up.
Democrat votes=23
Republican votes=17
PainQ
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: imthegoat
To be fair Trump does take a salary as its required, but he donates it. Just want to make sure facts are clear before someone else comments calling you a liar or something. So he is technically still "employed" by this corporation that is a subsidiary of the U.N.
I would like to correct your correction
The President is given a salary which he donates.
To be employed by any company requires a signed agreement ... I can tell you right now, The President has not signed or agreed to any such thing.
They can throw as much money as they want at him and he will just redistribute it somewhere it will do some good.
To work for anyone requires an agreement.
P
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Guyfriday
Thinking of Podesta arrest, I revisited Q25 (5by5 = Eyes On):
Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No.147449010 📁
Nov 1 2017 00:34:11 (EST)
Follow up to last post.
Return to comments re: Pelosi and John M (some of us refuse to say his last name for a reason).
This all has meaning - everything stated. Big picture stuff - few positions allow for this direct knowledge.
Proof to begin 11.3.
We all sincerely appreciate the work you do. Keep up the good fight. The flow of information is vital.
God bless.
If proof begins "11.3" then how could this fit to today, Friday Dec 13th = 12/13?
Re_read;
Proof to begin 11.3.
as
Proof 2 begin 11.3.
This gives us all the right numbers to form:
2 begin 11.3 = 12/13... if we put the 2 inbetween the two 1s!
Added bonus:
Proof 2 begin = Proof begins 2 years after post date of 2017 = 2019.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
EMN, your post made me consider... what happens when we can teleport the whole planet?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Guyfriday
Excerpt from Attorney Dershowitz's FoxNews' HANNITY interview Friday night:
More at: www.thegatewaypundit.com... rshowitz-explains-video/
Alan Dershowitz: Look, the most important development happened TODAY.
The Supreme Court of the United States absolutely pulled the rug out of part two of the impeachment referral by granting certiorari, by granting review in a case where Trump challenged a congressional subpoena!
And the Supreme Court said we’re going to hear this case!… Think of what that message is – It’s Trump was right!
Correct Interpretation? The second impeachment article against President Trump is "Obstruction of Congress", which stems from the White House ignoring Congressional subpoenas. The Supreme Court says it might be within the White House's purview to ignore Congressional subpoenas?
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: imthegoat
To be fair Trump does take a salary as its required, but he donates it. Just want to make sure facts are clear before someone else comments calling you a liar or something. So he is technically still "employed" by this corporation that is a subsidiary of the U.N.
I would like to correct your correction
The President is given a salary which he donates.
To be employed by any company requires a signed agreement ... I can tell you right now, The President has not signed or agreed to any such thing.
They can throw as much money as they want at him and he will just redistribute it somewhere it will do some good.
To work for anyone requires an agreement.
P
originally posted by: imthegoat
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: imthegoat
To be fair Trump does take a salary as its required, but he donates it. Just want to make sure facts are clear before someone else comments calling you a liar or something. So he is technically still "employed" by this corporation that is a subsidiary of the U.N.
I would like to correct your correction
The President is given a salary which he donates.
To be employed by any company requires a signed agreement ... I can tell you right now, The President has not signed or agreed to any such thing.
They can throw as much money as they want at him and he will just redistribute it somewhere it will do some good.
To work for anyone requires an agreement.
P
The Constitution requires the President to take a salary and that salary sum cannot be altered. Hence the reason he has to donate it rather than deny the salary all together. So yes, he is required. His agreement is to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America as stated by his oath.