What Did Barr-Durham Find In Italy - They Now Want to Interview Brennan and Clapper.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
Doesn't sound like it's that bad. He's not saying it's a legal mater or ordering them to answer questions.
I didn't read the article does it say that barr is looking at them as a person of interest or a witness?
Any talk of a subpoena or indictment?

A subpoena will only be necessary if they don't voluntarily cooperate.

The problem, for them, is they will be under oath (prosecutors don't talk to potential suspects casually without placing them under oath - unless their name is Clinton). So, either they continue lying, or they tell the truth (and go to jail), or they take the 5th, and be prosecuted (and go to jail).

The investigation wasn't expanded until just after they interviewed Christopher Steele - uh-oh, he's rolling over, get away from the fan, the $s!t is about to hit!

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: scraedtosleep

To determine the severity, a determination needs to be made whether this is a CRIMINAL investigation, or merely a FACT FINDING investigation.

From what I hear, criminal is much worse. But unlike Mueller's team, Durham's team isn't leaking to specific media contacts.

And Durham is empowered to issue subpoenas and empanel grand juries and get indictments.

They are peeing in their deep state briefs right now.

POPCORN & CORN POPS

Interesting developments 😃

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: scraedtosleep

To determine the severity, a determination needs to be made whether this is a CRIMINAL investigation, or merely a FACT FINDING investigation.

From what I hear, criminal is much worse. But unlike Mueller's team, Durham's team isn't leaking to specific media contacts.

The answer arrived today...

The New York Times originated the news that Durham's "Administrative Review" is now a "Criminal Investigation" today.

From "Sundance" who has followed and written about Spygate from day-1, here is his analysis of the accuracy of the New York Times's article, with some clarifications and explanations added.

NYT Accuracy Assessment and Clarifications: theconservativetreehouse.com...

a reply to: carewemust

The New York Times originated the news that Durham's "Administrative Review" is now a "Criminal Investigation" today.

And now we know that this "Criminal Investigation" was actually an investigation into Trump, based on Italian intel. www.abovetopsecret.com...

As to why Barr handed the info over to Durham, we can only speculate that it was to bury the intel to save Trump. Hopefully, Special Council Jack Smith gets to the bottom of this.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust

The New York Times originated the news that Durham's "Administrative Review" is now a "Criminal Investigation" today.

And now we know that this "Criminal Investigation" was actually an investigation into Trump, based on Italian intel. www.abovetopsecret.com...

As to why Barr handed the info over to Durham, we can only speculate that it was to bury the intel to save Trump. Hopefully, Special Council Jack Smith gets to the bottom of this.

OK OK OK...
Let's make a deal.
We focused on Trump from 2016 to 2020 (and many with TDS can't let it go).
Can we focus on Buythem Biden NOW, as he is president?
When Trump wins again in 2024, we can focus on him again.
OK?

The level of pathological obsession with Trump really is amazing. There still isn't a day that goes by without the MSM putting out multiple hit pieces on Trump. These people are mentally ill; there is just no other explanation.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
The level of pathological obsession with Trump really is amazing. There still isn't a day that goes by without the MSM putting out multiple hit pieces on Trump. These people are mentally ill; there is just no other explanation.

There is one other explanation.
He does not belong to "the club" AKA Globalist Elite.
Think about it.
They own the majority of media.
The media "reports" what they are told.
People are tools, especially those that will not think for themselves, the ones that feel like they have to belong to something, like a tribe, to feel important.
These people don't think for themselves.
They have a kind of hive mind.
So, if you wanted to keep these tool's attention off of the real problem, you give them a boogeyman to focus on.
You keep telling the tools, like little children, how bad the boogeyman is, they refuse to think for themselves or look beyond what they are told, so they believe it and spread the horror stories of the big, bad boogeyman to all of the other like minded tools.
They agree and believe as well because they have an actual NEED to fit in, to be part of the tribe.
Trump is the tools boogeyman.
The Globalist and Media are the hand wielding the tools and their very thoughts.

a reply to: Quadrivium

No deal. This is the culmination of numerous well-deserved investigations into the various crimes of Trump. The walls are closing in now, from all sides.

But you go ahead and nurture your Biden Derangement syndrome. It may come in handy in a few years.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Quadrivium

No deal. This is the culmination of numerous well-deserved investigations into the various crimes of Trump. The walls are closing in now, from all sides.

But you go ahead and nurture your Biden Derangement syndrome. It may come in handy in a few years.

:barfarker?

Yall been saying this for 6 years now. At what point do you people realize there really is no "there there" and you're being lead around by your nose??

a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

What we're seeing now is evidence of how Bill Barr used the DOJ to protect Trump. We all saw him come out and publicly misrepresent the findings of the Mueller report and the Howowitz investigation; how he used the DOJ as a weapon to investigate the investigators and how that backfired on him and Durham.

N.Y. Attorney General Letitia James is closing in. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is closing in, getting ready for indictments. Merrick Garland's appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith is closing in on the Trump's document fiasco and his involvement in the January 6th debacle. And then there's the whole fake electors thing.

We're getting there.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Soon. Any time now. 😀

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Quadrivium

But you go ahead and nurture your Biden Derangement syndrome. It may come in handy in a few years.

Dang you're thick.

Biden IS President....WE should be focusing on BUYthem Biden

Sheesh, take a pill or something.....

a reply to: Quadrivium

History?
We can't indict a sitting president, remember? But, we can indict a presidential candidate.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Quadrivium

History?
We can't indict a sitting president, remember? But, we can indict a presidential candidate.

Sure we can.
It is precedent, not law.

a reply to: Quadrivium

LOL

Good luck with that.

In the meantime, Trump's number is up!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

What we're seeing now is evidence of how Bill Barr used the DOJ to protect Trump. We all saw him come out and publicly misrepresent the findings of the Mueller report and the Howowitz investigation; how he used the DOJ as a weapon to investigate the investigators and how that backfired on him and Durham.

N.Y. Attorney General Letitia James is closing in. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is closing in, getting ready for indictments. Merrick Garland's appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith is closing in on the Trump's document fiasco and his involvement in the January 6th debacle. And then there's the whole fake electors thing.

We're getting there.

possibly hours away from a perp walk in an orange jumpsuit!

All that is needed now is to convince the general public that everyone else's classified document thing is not as criminal as Trump's document thing. After that, it's into solitary for Donnie!

You have got him this time for sure. Bank on it!

Tuesday, May 16, 2023

RE: abcnews.go.com...

The man who appointed JOHN DURHAM as Special Counsel to investigate the potential entrapment of Donald Trump says...

Former Attorney General William Barr called the FBI's investigation into former President Donald Trump "one of the greatest injustices" done toward a president.

In an appearance on Fox News on Tuesday, Barr offered defense and praise of his former boss, arguing that the investigation into Trump's alleged ties to the Russian government was an almost unparalleled injustice, and that special counsel John Durham's investigation has fully cleared Trump of all wrongdoing.

Continued at: www.washingtonexaminer.com...

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Quadrivium

LOL

Good luck with that.

In the meantime, Trump's number is up!

Poor Suckie, always wrong:



Laughable, as always.......

a reply to: carewemust

special counsel John Durham's investigation has fully cleared Trump of all wrongdoing.

Wow! And here I thought Durham's job was to investigate the investigators, not to clear Trump of all wrongdoing!
LOL
As if anyone could.

a reply to: M5xaz

Kash Patel must think you are pretty dumb to think that a Special Counsel appointed to head an investigation into another Special Counsel's investigation can determine the innocence or guilt of anyone. Especially so since the investigation being investigated resulted in numerous indictments and convictions.

I guess Kash Patel was right, since you reposted his nonsense as if it were real. Of all those listed in Patel's meme, none were indicted, let alone found guilty. And, the stupid list doesn't even include the two people that Durham did indict, but were acquitted.

Yep, it's a dump truck of hilarity, alright!