It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Scientist Behind The Navy's "UFO Patents" Has Now Filed One For A Compact Fusion Reactor

page: 2
31
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Jukiodone
Meanwhile back in the real world- the US Navy manages to maintain classified patents on things like how to make a stronger net.

All entirely legally within a well trodden Inventions Secrecy Act and subsequent legislation.

One of ATS's former SSP'ers talked us through the secrecy order classification process in several unnecessarily detailed posts.



The US Navy has more classified patents than any other branch of the armed services - by a long shot. 2nd in line is the AIr Force, but they are a significant way behind the US Navy.

The only governmental "organization" that may have more classified patents is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency - lovingly known as DARPA.

It's true. You could look it up.




posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: FredT

PZT??! Again!!!

A magnetic field is that “a field”. Look at the photo of a bar magnet and iron filings to get the idea. Doesn’t matter what shape that much so making a cone of PZT energized material does not seem to help. Let alone 4 of them directed at a central point.

To get fusion you need confinement time and pressure. No mention of field strength which gives you a sense of size. For example, Lockheed’s CFR is sized at 15 T and still needs a semi flatbed trailer and that is without shielding! And they call that “compact”!!

I will have to dig deeper to see what the size will be! Thanks for the rabbit hole!!




posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 11:35 AM
link   
The patent is for a design called a “spherical tokamak” and is thought of as a source for fast neutrons, not an energy source!

The numbers: Major radius 0.75 meters; plasma current 2 MA or less; magnetic field of 5 T or less (says ideal would be 1.5T); total heat output of 1MW

No mention of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) (But I was thinking about it. IF you have a room temperature superconductor, you would not need to cool it down saving space there. And IF you nested a weaker field inside a stronger one and the magnetic fields were large enough then the whole design shrinks. But that is not what the patent is about).

Thinking that the patent is a red herring. Which is a shame because we really need a fusion reactor up and running sooner rather than later. The patent is for a neutron source and I think that if it could be done it would have (GA D-III is about that size and stronger field strength and they have never reported more heat out than in). It is a nice review of several different designs and why each one has issues. But so does the “compact fusion neutron source” (CFNS) even if their beta numbers look good on paper.

It is just that... on paper.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jukiodone
Meanwhile back in the real world- the US Navy manages to maintain classified patents on things like how to make a stronger net.

All entirely legally within a well trodden Inventions Secrecy Act and subsequent legislation.



That seems to put some real perspective on it, Juki. Seeing as how these patents would be game-changing yet are not highly-classified would suggest that this and TTSA--who the patent guy is connected to--is something other than a part of some "disclosure" effort.

In other words there's an operation being done on the public--or some foreign target--that has nothing to do with exotic technology. At least not in the way we're being led to believe.

The unprecedented push and sudden acceptance by the MSM of all things "UAP" is another indicator that we're being "sold" something and it ain't E.T.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jukiodone
Meanwhile back in the real world- the US Navy manages to maintain classified patents on things like how to make a stronger net.

All entirely legally within a well trodden Inventions Secrecy Act and subsequent legislation.

One of ATS's former SSP'ers talked us through the secrecy order classification process in several unnecessarily detailed posts.



The US Navy is a piker in regards to classified patents compared to DARPA.

Different union but the same employer - don't ever forget that.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

You guys done forgot that Boeing has a truck bed sized fusion protype? They said they were awaiting significant funds to finish it.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Lockheed seems to be playing the same card.

There have been a couple “projects” that are no longer uh... “being pursued”. One is General Fusion’s design taken from Navy research from the 60’s.

I didn’t know about Boeing though. University of Colorado has a micro fusion device using gold nanowires and lasers that sits nicely on the lab bench.

Like I said... I hope that it is sooner!

Btw, he got the liquid lithium limiter right and nobody else mentioned it beyond test devices or future projects. At this point I have more questions like The Drive asked.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 11:52 PM
link   
a reply to: FredT
Well there you go.

I will not be counting any sheep as they jump over that fence. Before the NAVY or anybody gets up to anything or invents anything that isnt a +3 minute increase in air time, anytime this century.

Why you ask?

Well that's simple. Because politics has never in any age or even in the last few billion years ever created or invented anything. And after all, what is all this, but people playing politics, can any of them even conceive of anything else but that?

As far reaching as the moon to some I suppose, and people still waiting to get on that list to visit.

So while your waiting for that high frequency wave generators, and compact fusion generator.

You may be waiting forever, even if you lived to be the grand ol age of forever.

But I suppose we shall see... Or not.



posted on Oct, 11 2019 @ 05:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT


In other words there's an operation being done on the public--or some foreign target--that has nothing to do with exotic technology. At least not in the way we're being led to believe.



Possibly.... but if you had something that was the result of an array of multi-generational , compartmentalised projects which were ran off the books by various "Masters of the Universe"- you could easily envisage a time when ideologies shift and/or leaderships are in dispute.

Maybe the target isn't the public or foreign intel- maybe it's the other members of the project?

edit on 11-10-2019 by Jukiodone because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2019 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

No longer pursued in the white world,but full production in the black one.



posted on Oct, 12 2019 @ 08:57 AM
link   
Doesn't it take the power of blackholes, neutron star collisions to produce gravity waves? You would need something with more mass then th earth to create those so how is he able to do it in a lab?



posted on Oct, 12 2019 @ 04:12 PM
link   
US Navy Compact Fusion Reactor.

The Chinese are going to try to hack the plans from US government computers only to find it's a tar baby trap to catch them.

When that does not work they will send spies for long jail terms.

The US has leaked stories like this before and both the Chinese and Russians have both fell into the trap.

This is an old trap just like red Mercury.

Red mercury is thought by some to be the invention of an intelligence agency or criminal gang for the purpose of deceiving terrorists and rogue states who were trying to acquire nuclear technology on the black market.



posted on Oct, 15 2019 @ 07:12 AM
link   
a reply to: grey580

Need it for the space fleet !



posted on Oct, 15 2019 @ 07:45 AM
link   
a reply to: sapien82

Any sort of space fleet would be navy.

The Navy's experience with subs would what's needed for space.



posted on Oct, 15 2019 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: grey580

thats true

but they could just as easily use the Air Force for small fighter squadrons

its funny that we automatically equate SPACE as some sort of new ocean to explore
and so think of it in nautical terms



posted on Oct, 15 2019 @ 10:17 AM
link   
a reply to: gflyg

Well, that and a little Element 115, of course.




top topics



 
31
<< 1   >>

log in

join