UPDATED: Trey Gowdy has signed on to help Trump through impeachment inquiry

originally posted by: underwerks
You'd think someone as rich and criminally inclined as he is wouldn't keep hiring crappy lawyers.

You think Gowdy is a crappy lawyer? Please explain how you reached that conclusion.

a reply to: madmac5150

I *love* Trey Gowdy!!

I hope the story is true - the guy is incredible.

If he ran for President, I and many other people I know would vote for him in a heartbeat. I bet he'd win in a landslide too.

He's smart, articulate, knowledgeable on a really wide range of issues and if pushed - takes no BS or prisoners in his response.

If there really is a God looking out for the American people, he will run one day..

a reply to: mtnshredder

think he was referring to Cohen who is kind of a bad lawyer but i would not say gowdy is bad at all

Legal career Gowdy clerked for John P. Gardner on the South Carolina Court of Appeals as well as for federal judge George Ross Anderson Jr. of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. He then went into private practice at Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough[7] in Greenville, South Carolina before being appointed an Assistant United States Attorney in April 1994. Gowdy would later be awarded the Postal Inspector's Award for the successful prosecution of J. Mark Allen, one of "America's Most Wanted" suspects. In February 2000, he left the United States Attorney's Office to run for 7th Circuit Solicitor. He defeated incumbent Solicitor Holman Gossett[15] in the Republican primary. He ran unopposed in the general election. Gowdy was re-elected in 2004 and 2008, both times unopposed. During his tenure, he appeared in four[16] episodes of the television program Forensic Files, as well as Dateline NBC and SCETV.[17] He prosecuted the full set of criminal cases, including seven death penalty cases.

en.wikipedia.org...

but seeing as the dems are dragging Cohen into testify in NY again over the stormy nonsense i guess we get to see Cohen screw up again www.cnn.com... 10-09T02%3A01%3A07&fbclid=IwAR2cUnw_fQe7pmnFAk_GWIkTQUZyhl-QLBadhHhUcDxtTbrkIbRtFZn-hyE guess they are springing him from the clink for more testimony after his lying to congress conviction

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: madmac5150

Ha...this is the dems worst nightmare.

This was called a long time ago here too...that Gowdy was going to step down to join Trump at a later date.

Yup I believe I called that also, so glad to see he stepped up up he’s going to rip them apart

Also called Bannons departure planned, he’s now promoting trumps economic nationalism across Europe which will destroy the globalist socialist narrative in Europe also, its a big swamp

a reply to: madmac5150

I hope this is true. I love Trey Gowdy! I love watching him in action. He knows his stuff and makes the other side look stupid. Lol

a reply to: madmac5150

Trey Gowdy is the WOLF that is always in beast mode!

Trey gowdy, the guy who failed Benghazi hearings over 9 of them lol.

smart hire.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

This will be good for Trump

I find it interesting that he didnt want to alienate the FBI, could be a plus as he works through the "impeachment" maybe others in the FBI will come forward in Trumps favour.

en.wikipedia.org...

In May 2018, Gowdy challenged President Trump's unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that the FBI had spiedon his 2016 presidential campaign.[30] As a result of this, Gowdy was attacked by various Trump allies, and Politico reported that Gowdy was "virtually alone, getting little support from his House colleagues."[30] In June 2018, Speaker Paul Ryan came out in support of Gowdy, saying that Gowdy's assessment was "accurate".[40]


At a July 2018 congressional hearing, Gowdy suggested impropriety on behalf of FBI agent Peter Strzok and said that Strzok had shown bias in favor of Hillary Clinton and against Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election and that this shaped his work for the FBI.[41] During the hearing, Gowdy repeatedly pressed Strzok about a text message in which Strzok said "we'll stop Trump".[41]

originally posted by: underwerks
You'd think someone as rich and criminally inclined as he is wouldn't keep hiring crappy lawyers.

Gotta give respect where respect is due.

This man is a BEAST and you know it.

Keep letting your desperation and fear showing.

LIFE IS GOOD.

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: mtnshredder

think he was referring to Cohen who is kind of a bad lawyer but i would not say gowdy is bad at all

Yeah I assume he's talking about Cohen, but when it comes to bad lawyers the Dems really do not want to go there.

Or I might be forced to point out which members here on ATS were drooling over Michael Avenatti -- before he was arrested for scamming his clients. (And as a bonus, Republicans just sent a letter to the DOJ asking when they plan to indict Avenatti over the Kavenaugh hearings nonsense.)

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: mtnshredder

think he was referring to Cohen who is kind of a bad lawyer but i would not say gowdy is bad at all

Yeah I assume he's talking about Cohen, but when it comes to bad lawyers the Dems really do not want to go there.

Or I might be forced to point out which members here on ATS were drooling over Michael Avenatti -- before he was arrested for scamming his clients. (And as a bonus, Republicans just sent a letter to the DOJ asking when they plan to indict Avenatti over the Kavenaugh hearings nonsense.)

From what I have read, the WB's attorneys are no better than Avenatti....basically ambulance chasers that have been tweeting offers of cut rates and prices specifically for whistleblowers over the last couple years...

originally posted by: Night Star
a reply to: madmac5150

I hope this is true. I love Trey Gowdy! I love watching him in action. He knows his stuff and makes the other side look stupid. Lol

"makes the other side look More stupid"

Sorry I just had to fix that for you.

a reply to: madmac5150

I was kind of hoping he'd hang around long enough with Jay
Sekulow for the next Soliciter General spot... he really is
that good. And the choice might be the toughest for Trump
yet.
For my money he didn't seem as much a gate-keeper when on
committee as everybody described panning him... the swamp
is deep and he knew it. And unlike Nancy P. recently, it still isn't
worth throwing out the bathwater (House party majority) to get
Trump. I hope he gets a longer leash this time if he gets to go IN.

Well, Gowdy is good, *IF we need him, folks, there isn't an impeachment inquiry.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: mtnshredder

think he was referring to Cohen who is kind of a bad lawyer but i would not say gowdy is bad at all

Yeah I assume he's talking about Cohen, but when it comes to bad lawyers the Dems really do not want to go there.

Or I might be forced to point out which members here on ATS were drooling over Michael Avenatti -- before he was arrested for scamming his clients. (And as a bonus, Republicans just sent a letter to the DOJ asking when they plan to indict Avenatti over the Kavenaugh hearings nonsense.)

From what I have read, the WB's attorneys are no better than Avenatti....basically ambulance chasers that have been tweeting offers of cut rates and prices specifically for whistleblowers over the last couple years...

That's a farce for sure. From what I've read, his reported second whistleblower is just the guy who gave the rumors to the original whistleblower. And now they seem to have moved on to other calls that are allegedly alarming. (Apparently hoping that we'll forget about the Ukrainian stuff.)

I see a disbarment hearing in that lawyer's future.

I thought trump was bad at business and not actually wealthy? I keep hearing that on this website at least, I'm confused is he a bad businessman or a wealthy one? What crimes has the president been convicted of? Besides winning the election against Hillary? We all know that was a treasonous crime.



a reply to: underwerks

originally posted by: Rob808
I thought trump was bad at business and not actually wealthy? I keep hearing that on this website at least, I'm confused is he a bad businessman or a wealthy one? What crimes has the president been convicted of? Besides winning the election against Hillary? We all know that was a treasonous crime.



a reply to: underwerks

Exactly.

Hillary lost an election, that was rigged in her favor... so, ORANGE MAN BAD!

My guess, is that this whole Ukraine deal is her doing.

Tarnish the President with an impeachment, and destroy the Democrat front runner... leaving a vacuum, that opens the door for her to run.

a reply to: madmac5150

looks like the Dems are in some deep doo doo now, trey don't play dat.

originally posted by: underwerks
You'd think someone as rich and criminally inclined as he is wouldn't keep hiring crappy lawyers.

I also wonder how California voters with their wealth keep selecting these law school graduate reps like Schiff. Good point.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: madmac5150


Artists depiction of Adam Schiff after hearing the news. . . . .

That's also the reaction from all the leftist blue-check-marks on the internet.

I wonder how many people realize that in a LEGITIMATE impeachment hearing, the defendant gets to present evidence and witnesses too, not just the prosecution.

Rumor has it that if it ever gets to a point of an actual legitimate hearing, team-Trump intends to unload 50 years of political corruption onto the American people, and the world, which would likely end in riots if the guilty politicians, and their descendants who carry on the filth are not sentenced to death.

and, the icing on the cake for leftist freaks is that Trump could look at the camera and LIE TO THE WORLD, and he will still maintain the Presidency.........because Bill Clinton and precedent.

chew slowly you freaks, the truth is hard to swallow - you made your bed, now go lie in it.......the hammer is coming.