It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The men’s personal care industry is predicted to hit $166 billion by 2022, according to Allied Market Research. Just last year, men’s skin-care products alone saw a more than 7% jump in sales and with the category currently valued at $122 million, according to market researcher NPD Group.
“In recent years, the notion that men can’t or shouldn’t be using skin-care products or caring more in general about all aspects of their appearance has been receding,” said Andrew Stablein, research analyst at Euromonitor International in a research note.
The success of digitally native brands catered directly to men such as Harry’s and popular subscription service Dollar Shave Club reveal “the average men’s grooming routine isn’t about just shaving, but can be aided by using skin-care products,” Stablein said.
originally posted by: Serdgiam
a reply to: zosimov
I dont see a link though, so I am unsure how to find my individuality.
originally posted by: Serdgiam
a reply to: zosimov
There is a difference between saying "im just expressing myself!" as justification for buying crap and actually using it as a tool in order to leverage our creativity and imagination. The former has us being sucked into consumerism as if it has the meaning we seek, while the latter is just very nice window dressing.
We can put crown molding in our house, but its probably a mistake to start thinking it is the house and build everything out of it.
originally posted by: zosimov
LOL! I did, however, edit the OP to add a link because it adds to the discussion.
Love these thoughts here, Serdgiam. As per usual for me, I think true creativity and expression is the answer to the problem of consumerism. You're also right that we do run into a problem finding raw materials ourselves anymore and that artists do need tools. I guess being creative about what to use and where to find tools is fun too
originally posted by: schuyler
What's interesting about these threads that bemoan the effect of advertising is that the poster appears to be immune to it, but is only worried about everyone else.
But doing so has definitely made me wonder about marketing, consumerism, and spending
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
By this time, we should ALL be past the wondering stage about how marketers work on us in every field of our lives. Well past wondering.
The second is to this specific example of how we are exploited by those who would sell their crap to us for our physical self images, and that is from the Sermon on the Mount. ''And why take ye thought for raiment?
Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow;
they toil not, neither do they spin:''
originally posted by: Serdgiam
Perhaps where the issue comes in is when folks start personally identifying with things, or worse, perceive some huge, faceless company as if it represents them personally.
We see a lot of that nowadays. When a company like Gillette puts out a "woke" ad, you get people who take the criticism of that ad as personal attacks. As if Gillette, or Proctor & Gamble, cares about any of it at all. They are just trying to make as much money as they can, but the brand loyalty thats fostered from this idea that such a corporation represents "you" as an individual is.. very good for the company. Unless, of course, in doing so they isolate more people than they gain.
Maybe someday soon, we will start to see people treat their favorite corporation like their sports team. Merchandise! Brand (team) loyalty! They can do no wrong!
Rah! Rah! Rah! GoooooOOOO Shoreline Industrial & Electric!
We are already kinda there with "battles" like Apple vs Real Computers ( ), but I think it can, and just might, get a helluva lot worse.
originally posted by: zosimov
I think you've hit on a key point here. Especially your point I bolded-- that the issue might just be when people start self identifying through goods/stuff/merchandise. Companies like Nike have waded into socio-political issues and I think makeup companies may have capitalized on recent issues as well.
One aspect of the movie Idiocracy (have you seen it? interesting movie) that stood out to me was that there were brand names everywhere-- but only a few of the same brands, huge conglamerates.
originally posted by: zosimov
It’s beautiful how people express themselves through their individual styles, looks, traditional costumes. I, too, enjoy nice things, pretty things, colors and textures, which made it hard to make a pact not to buy myself anything (beyond the necessities) for a year. But doing so has definitely made me wonder about marketing, consumerism, and spending.
originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: schuyler
Haha nice to see ya in another thread bemoaning the OP's opinion but offering little by way of meaningful rebuttal.
Does strike me as approaching ad hominem territory, which as the recipient I don't mind but it's a terrible way to offer an argument.
However there are women
who have the wear with all to buy several at exorbitant prices (in the £1,000's
infact what some people earn in a year.