posted on Mar, 7 2005 @ 11:01 PM
Well terrorism is a tactic of war isn't it?
So, the cause of a tactic of war must be "to gain some advantage."
Now let us ask the question "quo bono," who benefitted from "terrorism?"
Whoopie, the military industrial complex, I mean the "arsenal of democracy."
Now our mainstream media of course has "locked down," a story of what happened on September 11, 2001. That story says Osama bin Laden directed and
financed everything, and it was 19 Saudi Arabians, whoops less than that, uh oh the FBI says it does not know. There are lots of whoops to this whole
thing, but the same lockstep story keeps filling the minds of most people who are portrayed as basically NASCAR fans or Professional Wrestling fans.
Such a huge intellect cannot be convinced otherwise! Hey I like both sports, but I also like to read the Classics, Shakespeare, and technical
Now the cause of "terrorism," is that it is a tactic of war, and all tactics of war are applied during war by all sides to greater and lesser
degrees. Of course when the "good guys do it," we are blind to it, or it is "justified."
Now please research 911, figure out how buildings do not collapse after fires, except for the trade center, and they do not collapse at the rate of
gravity unless there is great assistance, or rather ordnance strategically and tactically placed. Larry Silverstein said on that day, about Building
7, "we are going to pull it," an industry term for controlled demolition. He said it on Public TV.
Ed please are you and others fooling yourself too much on this one? It just looks so silly, with some thoughtful Googling even a 9 year old can master
and recognize with 4th grade reading skills. Oh and others here, oh well I guess maybe you just have to make a living and have to agree with everyone
else. Some of you might just be on the payroll, okay I give up, go pay your bills this way. For me I have alternative futures.
[edit on 8-3-2005 by SkipShipman]