It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You didn't really answer my question though, on whether or not you think the pilot was mistaken when he said "it's rotating". So again I ask you again, do you think the UFO was actually rotating? Or was that a misperception by the pilot? It's a simple question.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Here's a question.
Why haven't we just caught one and said here, it's just [fill any any explanation]?
This is a great case I want to present to everyone. This case involves over 30 eyewitnesses and plenty of documentation of what appears to be a massive UFO that appeared over the Klondike Highway in the Yukon Territory of Canada on December 11th, 1996.
originally posted by: neoholographic
As you hear in the audio, they saw a fleet of them.
Graves: Yup. So there wasn’t a whole fleet of these (larger craft) there was just all these little guys. And then there was the one object which we had never seen before that was significantly larger.
No, you really still said nothing about the rotation which is what I was asking about.
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: Arbitrageur
I did answer it.
In all that no mention of rotation, that the pilots mention. In a related question, did you ever figure out why the name of the video is "Gimbal"?
The Pilots start talking around the 1:13 mark.
There's huge flaws in the video you posted.
First, he says the Pilots are seeing the engines of a Jet. He says it's a two engine jet but it's at a distance where it's blurred and the Pilots are seeing it as singular. For this to be the case, there has to be a fleet of jets that are invisible to the Pilot at just the right distance where the two engine jets appear as a fleet of singular objects. That strains credulity. As you hear in the audio, they saw a fleet of them. This is just ad hoc speculation after the fact.
Secondly, his whole theory is debunked because I saw on a program about this where they checked the radar data for like 200-300 miles and also checked with any Military installations in the vicinity. If this was a fleet of invisible Jets that the Pilots couldn't see, these Jets would have been picked up on radar somewhere after they moved out of site of the Pilots.
This would be the first thing you would do. Did anyone pick up any Jets or birds like 5, 10 or 15 minutes after the Pilots sighting. Where did these Jets go? Did they just vanish after the Pilots saw them? It makes no sense. Like I said, if they were a fleet of Jets that just happened to be at the exact distance where their dual engines were blurred into one engine, then why didn't any radar data pick up anything after the Pilots saw this ghost fleet?
I think you're missing the point. That case WAS compelling and unexplained at one point! The only thing that changed it was time and more information, so how do we know that couldn't happen to any unexplained case?
I asked you if there was an example of a sighting that's compelling and unexplained. You gave me a case that was unidentified then identified. All that does is bolster a blind belief. I already stipulated that misidentifications can occur.
Although most people are completely unaware of its existence, the UFO-Nukes Connection is now remarkably well-documented. U.S. Air Force, FBI, and CIA files declassified via the Freedom of Information Act establish a convincing, ongoing pattern of UFO activity at American nuclear weapons sites extending back to December 1948.
Moreover, these mysterious incursions are not ancient history, so to speak, occurring only during the Cold War era. Indeed, evidence suggests that multiple, ongoing incidents have taken place near ICBM sites operated by Malmstrom AFB, Montana, as recently as October 2012.
To date, Hastings has interviewed more than 150 military veterans who were involved in various UFO-related incidents at U.S. missile sites, weapons storage facilities, and nuclear bomb test ranges. The events described by these individuals leave little doubt that the U.S. nuclear weapons program is an ongoing source of interest to someone possessing vastly superior technology.
Every U.F.O. should be easily explained because they should be picked up on radar after these sightings and we can simply identify what it is but these U.F.O.'s vanish after many of these sightings and can't be picked up on radar.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
So probably the most compelling UFO case left on my list is the January 2000 UFO sighting in Illinois
originally posted by: neoholographic
Unless you have evidence that this fleet of ghost jets popped on radar at anytime after the Pilots sighting, where did they go? Did this ghost fleet vanish?
Wow, these shows have increased the production value and more importantly the information being discussed is amazing.
Has anyone else noticed the quality of U.F.O. shows has gone up?
Though, I wouldn't say that they've really done anything to enhance the quality of UFOlogy beyond cranking up the limelight that's already being shined upon it. It's the kind of limelight that's all luff and no stuff. They lack substance yet appear to be bursting with a sort of gimmicky entertainment value.
originally posted by: Nickless
originally posted by: neoholographic
Unless you have evidence that this fleet of ghost jets popped on radar at anytime after the Pilots sighting, where did they go? Did this ghost fleet vanish?
So does that mean you just choose to ignore that other pilot, who said those were much smaller targets? Which easily explains why they weren't for example observed visually, and were likely just birds.
originally posted by: neoholographic
In the first pseudoskeptic video he correctly points out the enormous heat signature given off by the object that was very noticeable in infrared. If you would have just taken the time to watch the video instead of blindly saying it's birds, you would have never made such an asinine statement.
originally posted by: Nickless
originally posted by: neoholographic
In the first pseudoskeptic video he correctly points out the enormous heat signature given off by the object that was very noticeable in infrared. If you would have just taken the time to watch the video instead of blindly saying it's birds, you would have never made such an asinine statement.
Do you even read what others are writing to you? Again, according to Graves, there was only one larger craft, which is what the FLIR video shows, and a fleet of other significantly smaller targets, which are not shown in FLIR, hence we don't know anything about their heat signatures.
That large target was most likely another plane, the smaller ones were birds. Understood?
That means there's no point for you to keep repeating your ideas of "invisible planes", since there's no reason to believe those other targets were big enough to be any kind of planes.
originally posted by: neoholographic
The Pilot said they look like drones.
At 0:03, in the first radio transmission, we hear one of the pilots state that it is “a [expletive] drone” aircraft. At 0:06, upon further observation, a different observer calmly states, “There is a whole fleet of them. Look on the ASA (radar display).”
Graves: Yup. So there wasn’t a whole fleet of these (larger craft) there was just all these little guys. And then there was the one object which we had never seen before that was significantly larger.
originally posted by: Nickless
originally posted by: neoholographic
The Pilot said they look like drones.
He believed the large one on FLIR was a drone, before that fleet comment:
At 0:03, in the first radio transmission, we hear one of the pilots state that it is “a [expletive] drone” aircraft. At 0:06, upon further observation, a different observer calmly states, “There is a whole fleet of them. Look on the ASA (radar display).”
thevault.tothestarsacademy.com...
So again, do you believe Graves, who said on Unidentified, episode four, that the fleet were significantly smaller objects?
Graves: Yup. So there wasn’t a whole fleet of these (larger craft) there was just all these little guys. And then there was the one object which we had never seen before that was significantly larger.
originally posted by: neoholographic
So you make the leap that their birds? Based on what?
Are the Pilots too dumb to recognize birds on a radar but you have the power to discern this without seeing any footage?
originally posted by: Nickless
originally posted by: neoholographic
So you make the leap that their birds? Based on what?
Was that a yes? You believe Graves? Is it that hard to give a straight answer to a straight question?
Are the Pilots too dumb to recognize birds on a radar but you have the power to discern this without seeing any footage?
As I said above, they were "likely just birds". It's a pretty reasonable guess for something small that flies in (V-)formation, isn't it?
Do I need to remind you that you are the one constantly indicating those pilots have to be idiots if they can't identify blobs on FLIR and blips on radar, in real-time, while flying? If they could, we wouldn't be having this conversation. And with your logic, they are also idiots if they can't tell a drone from an alien spacecraft or something, since, as quoted above, one of them seemed to initially believe it was a drone.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Again, this makes no sense according to the link you posted.
originally posted by: Nickless
originally posted by: neoholographic
Again, this makes no sense according to the link you posted.
Most of what the TTSA has claimed doesn't make any sense, and isn't supported by their lame videos. Now you apparently decided to place your blind faith in their hollow words.
Just try to focus for just this brief moment, so that we can make some real progress here, and give me a straight yes or no answer to the question I have been repeating. Do you believe that "the fleet" were much smaller objects than the one on FLIR, as Graves has said?