It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC 7 could not collapsed from fire, but WTC 5 had partial collapse from fire?

page: 5
5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 18 2019 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Jesushere
Is there any evidence of columns being physical cut in the video, audio, seismic, or photographic evidence? Again. The exterior columns were right at WTC 7’s windows. Is that false? What are you claiming had to be cut for eighteen floors for the facade to fall at the speed of free fall? How many supports on how many floors by how many planted pyrotechnics?


24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns.
Width of the building
If there was resistance- freefall can't happen
NIST illustrations and computer model of the collapse does not look identical to the real collapse
NIST building is a crushed can coming down. NIST computer simulation model predicted this
Reality- building seven walls and roofline dropped down uniformly. Can only be done by controlled demolition.




posted on Aug, 18 2019 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Jesushere

You


NIST never tested for explosives. Not my job to do this. Direct your complaints elsewhere.


Such a false argument.

What were they supposed to test. There is no evidence of explosives cutting columns in the audio, video, seismic, or photo evidence. There is no evidence in the metallurgy of the buildings that failures were caused by explosives. There were no demolitions shrapnel recovered from the injured and dead. There was no demolitions shrapnel, no blasting cap fragments, no sign of a system of wires for a CD system. But over 19,000 fragments of human remains were recovered. What would randomly testing over 1,000,000 tons of rubble from thirteen destroyed buildings contaminated with a toxic soup out in the weather for up to three months prove?


How do you know, they did not find anything? They are covering up world seven demolition for 18 years and you expect them to be honest with other findings?



posted on Aug, 18 2019 @ 07:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jesushere

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Jesushere

You


NIST never tested for explosives. Not my job to do this. Direct your complaints elsewhere.


Such a false argument.

What were they supposed to test. There is no evidence of explosives cutting columns in the audio, video, seismic, or photo evidence. There is no evidence in the metallurgy of the buildings that failures were caused by explosives. There were no demolitions shrapnel recovered from the injured and dead. There was no demolitions shrapnel, no blasting cap fragments, no sign of a system of wires for a CD system. But over 19,000 fragments of human remains were recovered. What would randomly testing over 1,000,000 tons of rubble from thirteen destroyed buildings contaminated with a toxic soup out in the weather for up to three months prove?


How do you know, they did not find anything? They are covering up world seven demolition for 18 years and you expect them to be honest with other findings?


Ok. From the video, photographic, audio, and seismic data, what should they have found.

But your implication is that hundreds of individuals in the NYFD / NYPD, local officials, the New York coroner’s official, and civilian contracts (many who lost family, friends, and colleagues on 9/11) would have to be complicit in a cover up.



posted on Aug, 18 2019 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Why not?
Consider what it takes to convince people that the world is round.



posted on Aug, 18 2019 @ 07:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

And not one photo of a column being physically cut that should be clearly visible through the windows. No flashes. No evidence of thermite burning. No evidence of an over pressure event with the power to cut columns. No evidence of demolitions shrapnel being ejected from detonations to initiate movement.

What’s that about the truth movement? Claiming the office fires were not that hot. Didn’t you post that too. I guess that rules out thermite that burns over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. You said yourself the fires at WTC 7 were not that hot.
edit on 18-8-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Aug, 18 2019 @ 07:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

So, which is it?

That the WTC 7 fires were not that hot?

Or there were floor to floor fires on “24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns” from thermite burning at a temperature greater that 3000 degrees Fahrenheit?



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 06:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Jesushere

Reality- building seven walls and roofline dropped down uniformly. Can only be done by controlled demolition.


Bull cookies



Tell the workers families killed in this collapse roof to ground due to connection failure of top slab

edit on 19-8-2019 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 09:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Jesushere

And not one photo of a column being physically cut that should be clearly visible through the windows. No flashes. No evidence of thermite burning. No evidence of an over pressure event with the power to cut columns. No evidence of demolitions shrapnel being ejected from detonations to initiate movement.

What’s that about the truth movement? Claiming the office fires were not that hot. Didn’t you post that too. I guess that rules out thermite that burns over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. You said yourself the fires at WTC 7 were not that hot.


Will you provide, the pictures that show 47 floors from top to bottom collapsed? I'd think 47 floors collapsing will have a more devastating effect and yet we see no visible change from the outside. Its's silly argument, why do we see no flashes and thermite burning, outside the building.

NIST trying to claim one localised failure can cause the entire inner core to collapse. If it was that easy, demolition crews would be out of a job. They just have to rig one column and that entire building would come down.

The tests Harrit and others carried out- the red/grey chips showed the ignite at very low temps. This is not classic thermite. These chips appear to be an engineered substance produced in a lab. It has similar ingredients, like thermite, but likely mixed with other exotic materials also. How you can make nano-thermite chips from nothing? There has to be way of mixing and fusing it together to form nanochips that seemly are perfectly sized 100um.

I would not rush to judgement these chips were used to take down WTC7, as they are found in dust belonging to the towers. Every sample had the chips.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 09:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

Again.

And not one photo of a column being physically cut that should be clearly visible through the windows. No flashes. No evidence of thermite burning. No evidence of an over pressure event with the power to cut columns. No evidence of demolitions shrapnel being ejected from detonations to initiate movement.

What’s that about the truth movement? Claiming the office fires were not that hot. Didn’t you post that too. I guess that rules out thermite that burns over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. You said yourself the fires at WTC 7 were not that hot.

So, which is it?

That the WTC 7 fires were not that hot?

Or there were floor to floor fires on “24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns” from thermite burning at a temperature greater that 3000 degrees Fahrenheit?

You want me to open up to cut columns. Then post evidence of columns being physically cut.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 09:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: wmd_2008

originally posted by: Jesushere

Reality- building seven walls and roofline dropped down uniformly. Can only be done by controlled demolition.


Bull cookies



Tell the workers families killed in this collapse roof to ground due to connection failure of top slab


Slow buckling of floors would pull in the perimeter walls of the building.

NIST model predicted it.
www.quora.com...

Reality is this never happened.

edit on 19-8-2019 by Jesushere because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Jesushere

Again.

And not one photo of a column being physically cut that should be clearly visible through the windows. No flashes. No evidence of thermite burning. No evidence of an over pressure event with the power to cut columns. No evidence of demolitions shrapnel being ejected from detonations to initiate movement.

What’s that about the truth movement? Claiming the office fires were not that hot. Didn’t you post that too. I guess that rules out thermite that burns over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. You said yourself the fires at WTC 7 were not that hot.

So, which is it?

That the WTC 7 fires were not that hot?

Or there were floor to floor fires on “24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns” from thermite burning at a temperature greater that 3000 degrees Fahrenheit?

You want me to open up to cut columns. Then post evidence of columns being physically cut.


You can't comprehend or are you just a bit slow?

Just told you, you will not find any known image showing 47 floors collapsing inside the building.

Yet you keep looking for one isolated Column failure photo?
Outside we don't see any failures occurring inside the building
We only see the outside collapse

The Nanothermite explantation you can't process for some odd reason too. The chips ignite at low temps, not high temps normally associated with classic thermite burning.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

The collapse of WTC 7 is on video. Show video evidence of columns being physical cut. Are the exterior columns not right at the WTC 7 windows and facade. But not a single piece of evidence of something cutting into the facade. No visible action in the windows. Not even the bright slow 3000 degree Fahrenheit fires of how many thermite charges burning in the CD fantasy.
edit on 19-8-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed




top topics



 
5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join