posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 09:25 AM
Much has been written about Epstein. Moving forward we shall see if Attorneys for the US Department of State or some other US Federal Agency come
flying into into the courtroom where he is being tried and state to the presiding Judge that on behalf of the "national security of the United States"
this needs to stop right here right now or something else to that affect their cause, or agenda. Thus another potential slap on the wrist or "sealed"
forever evidence and documentation kept from the public eye. We shall see.
Following his release from prison, Epstein embarked on a media blitz, using public relations professionals to place articles in publications such
as Forbes, the National Review and HuffPost. According to the Times, in the case of Forbes and HuffPost, the stories, which described Epstein as
“one of the largest backers of cutting-edge science around the world” and a person “taking action to help a number of scientists thrive during
the ‘Trump Era,’ respectively, were written by outside contributors who were able to publish to the site with minimal, if any, editorial
All three of the stories were removed from the internet after the Times began making inquiries. Neither Forbes nor HuffPost still allow unfiltered
outsider publishing on their platforms.
Much has also been written about Bill and Trump. Bills out of the game but Trump is very much in it and much has been written about his statements and
his younger days with Epstein in the 1990's. Obviously several articles I read were trying to connect Trump as another predator who is conjoined at
the hip with Epstein. Thus hes guilty! Possibly yea and possibly no.
So here comes this article by The New York Times and picked up by several other media outlets. NY Times basically called out Forbes, Huffington Post
and The National Review for what was simply pro Epstein Propaganda. So they pulled the story and removed [scrubbed] them from their servers. Forever.
So here me out. Do these same "MSM" news guys usually trash Trump routinely or do they back him up or is it a 50 /50 split. Because if they are
trashing him it would give some credence to Trumps innocence. Additionally, the NY Times seems to have toned it down a bit; meaning to routinely
trash Trump. So what happened? Did The Deep State get conquered in the shadows and as a result did the see I eh phone into the NY Times relating to
Forbes, Huffington Post and National Review and thus they wrote their story that called out the others who then deleted the Pro-Epstein Propaganda?
Me thinks so. What say you? Also, Q DID NOT SEND ME!
edit on 24-7-2019 by Waterglass because: typo
edit on 24-7-2019 by Waterglass because: added