It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Invasion by foreign countries

page: 1
13

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2019 @ 05:18 PM
link   
It's interesting that the US seems to ignore the fact it's being invaded by foreign governments. Well, some of us call it a fact. Other people debate that and do not see it as an invasion... I only started thinking about this recently. People call it an "invasion" and the other side argues that it's just asylum seekers or "immigration". But what better way for a foreign government to destroy a country that has nukes (and all sorts of other evil diabolical weapons) than to indirectly invade it by playing on the sympathy of its citizens and the sense of "white guilt" that people on the left(democrats and liberals) seem to have?

The US is considered the only "super power" and so in order to defeat it, you can't fight it directly. That would lead to world war 3 and it would only take a few nukes in the atmosphere to kill off most of the worlds population. On one hand, you can't expect the US military or government to care too much that they're being invaded. A normal country with a normal military would have the job of preventing an invasion and erosion of its sovereignty and national security, but ours is different. The founding fathers were really just some rich guys (freemasons) that didn't want to pay their taxes and also set up the country as a sort of masonic experiment. Our military's existence is not to defend the nation, but to be "professional" soldiers, making money, making weapons, lining the pockets of themselves and their masters. How many people in the US military realized that it was all a ruse and just said "f^** it, I'm looking out for number one, gotta take care of myself and my family"? Several of my friends who are ex military have admitted they were indoctrinated and trained to hate civilians, so caring about the fate of this country shouldn't be a top priority for them.

On the other hand, this covert invasion disguised as asylum seekers is brilliant, because as I said, you can't fight the US directly. Attacking the US would have terrible consequences obviously. Part of me likes the freedoms we have in the US, but I also see the evil our government has been doing/perpetuating, so can the alternative (gradual destruction of the USA) be any worse? It seems the US government's masters, the Khazars/banksters in the UK and Israel have no interest in preserving the experiment the way it has been much longer. Maybe this is for the best, the remote neural monitoring and hive-mind tech that the US government has been using to torture millions of innocent people probably isn't going to magically disappear after the US is dissolved, but at least there's a possibility things can be different, or change for the better. If you look back in history at how many of the founding fathers were freemasons, and Albert Pike's statements about how they seemingly view certain white bloodlines and jews as superior to everyone else, you'd notice it was set up this way from the beginning. They don't care about the average citizen or what happens to the US, as long as they maintain their power and control, and in some way they probably will. Do Americans actually deserve this fate? Maybe they do for not being smarter and realizing this was happening. It's an invasion, at least in my opinion. It is a communist and globalist invasion and I don't think we have a country anymore.

But anyway... /rant




posted on Jun, 14 2019 @ 06:07 PM
link   
If immigrants are arriving anyway. We need to make it easier for Venezuelans. They’ll never vote socialist again .



posted on Jun, 14 2019 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Anomaly0101
It's interesting that the US seems to ignore the fact it's being invaded by foreign governments. Well, some of us call it a fact. Other people debate that and do not see it as an invasion... I only started thinking about this recently. People call it an "invasion" and the other side argues that it's just asylum seekers or "immigration". But what better way for a foreign government to destroy a country that has nukes (and all sorts of other evil diabolical weapons) than to indirectly invade it by playing on the sympathy of its citizens and the sense of "white guilt" that people on the left(democrats and liberals) seem to have?


Perhaps a foreign country could place a puppet leader in control of the US? One who would not necessarily be obviously biased, but would do nothing against the goals and aims of the true controllers.

That would be the absolute easiest and lowest 'cost' method of any, of taking control of a country, rather than the enormous cost, time and dubious outcome of invading by tens of thousands of relatively poor unarmed individuals with minds of their own and goals extremely different than any coordinating leadership.

In fact 'invading' by some sort of increment of ingress of the disadvantaged is probably the most stupidly ineffectual way of gaining control of another country. You'd have to be paranoid to consider it a viable threat.


The US is considered the only "super power"


What happened to China, Russia, The European Union, Brazil and India?

Definitely, dropping all those trade agreements, pulling out of diplomatic endeavors, pulling out of international accords and withdrawing troops everywhere reduces the control over other countries that the US once had. Are you sure it is a superpower anymore?


and so in order to defeat it, you can't fight it directly. That would lead to world war 3 and it would only take a few nukes in the atmosphere to kill off most of the worlds population. On one hand, you can't expect the US military or government to care too much that they're being invaded. A normal country with a normal military would have the job of preventing an invasion and erosion of its sovereignty and national security, but ours is different. The founding fathers were really just some rich guys (freemasons) that didn't want to pay their taxes and also set up the country as a sort of masonic experiment. Our military's existence is not to defend the nation, but to be "professional" soldiers, making money, making weapons, lining the pockets of themselves and their masters. How many people in the US military realized that it was all a ruse and just said "f^** it, I'm looking out for number one, gotta take care of myself and my family"? Several of my friends who are ex military have admitted they were indoctrinated and trained to hate civilians, so caring about the fate of this country shouldn't be a top priority for them.

On the other hand, this covert invasion disguised as asylum seekers is brilliant, because as I said, you can't fight the US directly. Attacking the US would have terrible consequences obviously. Part of me likes the freedoms we have in the US, but I also see the evil our government has been doing/perpetuating, so can the alternative (gradual destruction of the USA) be any worse? It seems the US government's masters, the Khazars/banksters in the UK and Israel have no interest in preserving the experiment the way it has been much longer. Maybe this is for the best, the remote neural monitoring and hive-mind tech that the US government has been using to torture millions of innocent people probably isn't going to magically disappear after the US is dissolved, but at least there's a possibility things can be different, or change for the better. If you look back in history at how many of the founding fathers were freemasons, and Albert Pike's statements about how they seemingly view certain white bloodlines and jews as superior to everyone else, you'd notice it was set up this way from the beginning. They don't care about the average citizen or what happens to the US, as long as they maintain their power and control, and in some way they probably will. Do Americans actually deserve this fate? Maybe they do for not being smarter and realizing this was happening. It's an invasion, at least in my opinion. It is a communist and globalist invasion and I don't think we have a country anymore.

But anyway... /rant


You have some valid points but overall, nah.



posted on Jun, 14 2019 @ 08:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

This is how China takes over. Except their invasion force isn't sent as refugees; they are students, workers and business people. Little by little they trickle in, work, buy up property and businesses or start new businesses, intermarry in the case of other Asian countries.

Before you know it critical mad is trashed, the culture and economy have been transformed and the country has lost itself.



posted on Jun, 14 2019 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Anomaly0101

The alphabet agencies hire Hackers, they had one job.

Political and economic espionage is par for the course, we all know most nations do it. Will it stop?never.



posted on Jun, 14 2019 @ 09:57 PM
link   
On the other hand, you could get rid of all imaginary delineations of land and just have one whole unified world instead of a "divided & conquered" one. Unite all under one flag with equal rights/access/privileges to all. Solved.



posted on Jun, 14 2019 @ 10:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: R2019
On the other hand, you could get rid of all imaginary delineations of land and just have one whole unified world instead of a "divided & conquered" one. Unite all under one flag with equal rights/access/privileges to all. Solved.


That wouldn't work.

The right-whingers would have no-one but themselves to blame for their ills.



posted on Jun, 15 2019 @ 05:18 PM
link   

edit on 15-6-2019 by DukeMisterio because: mossad



new topics

top topics



 
13

log in

join