It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

page: 16
118
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: 1point92AU

Sure.


"Sure" as if said with a passive shrug of the shoulders? What would you consider irrefutable proof? Wouldn't one have to disprove the current body of evidence and then present a new irrefutable body of evidence?
edit on 10-4-2019 by 1point92AU because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 03:59 PM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

You are correct, it was said with a passive shrug of the shoulders because "irrefutable" is subjective.

I thought the experiment was to see if I was open to those two scenarios being true. I am.

Not really sure if you had some other point.



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: 1point92AU

You are correct, it was said with a passive shrug of the shoulders because "irrefutable" is subjective.

I thought the experiment was to see if I was open to those two scenarios being true. I am.

Not really sure if you had some other point.


No, the word irrefutable by definition is not subjective because it's not up to you to determine it's definition. My question was what is irrefutable evidence to you? The thought experiment begins when you answer what you consider irrefutable proof. I.E. video evidence, printed evidence, audio evidence, etc.



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

Ok, so do you have this "irrefutable proof"?


My question was what is irrefutable evidence to you?

That wasn't your original question. This is a follow-up question and "irrefutable evidence to me" would be subjective.

Anything can be irrefutable if it can be corroborated.

ETA: Of course, sufficient corroboration would also be subjective.
edit on 10-4-2019 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: 1point92AU

Ok, so do you have this "irrefutable proof"?


My question was what is irrefutable evidence to you?

That wasn't your original question. This is a follow-up question and "irrefutable evidence to me" would be subjective.

Anything can be irrefutable if it can be corroborated.


So you have indirectly answered the deeper question (what do you consider irrefutable evidence) with your above response. The fact that you think the definition of "irrefutable" is subjective shows your cognitive bias.

Cognitive Bias
A cognitive bias is a systematic pattern of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment.


If you want to stop deflecting I can continue the thought experiment relative to this thread and prove a point. And it won't be subjective.



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:30 PM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

I didn't say the definition of "irrefutable" is subjective. I said that what people consider "irrefutable" is subjective.

Continue with your little experiment if you want.


+2 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:31 PM
link   
Lol.
Cuck Todd breaking msnbc caption ' "Barr subscribes to president Trumps spying "conspiracy theory"



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:32 PM
link   
Dubble poost


edit on 4 10 2019 by dashen because: Mischief



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: dashen
Lol.
Cuck Todd breaking msnbc caption ' "Barr subscribes to president Trumps spying "conspiracy theory"



Todd is the Dance Bandleader on the Titanic.


+3 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:43 PM
link   
I seem to recall a Q 'watch' indicating 4/10/19 as a significant day.
Barr drank a lot of "water" today.


"WATCH the WATER"

edit on 10-4-2019 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 04:52 PM
link   
Baker day two - pg 30



"on our side." Curious use of words - they are meant to be on no side, but if one had to be "chosen" then they serve the Executive.



Obstruction PRIOR to Comey firing seems more like a plan to me then a reaction to events.

One this is pretty clear from the testimonies. Everyone knew exactly what they were doing - Steele on down. This is not a case of compartmentalization where folks were shocked to learn what happened. Now who was what hat when remains to be seen in the big reveal.

If RR was in on the Wire Tape conversations, and RR suggested the letting go of Comey, and RR was in on the hiring of Mueller...



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:02 PM
link   
a reply to: dashen

The DS didn't waste time attacking that army, with fecal transplants:
Scientists find way to DRASTICALLY reduce autism symptoms

No coincidences.



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Normie poop is autistic Kryptonite?
I don't know about you but I'm seriously questioning the validity of our reality



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: dashen

Guess Unit 9900 recruitment numbers will suffer.



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:33 PM
link   
Rudy



"...until he is removed."

Make of that what you will.

edit on 10-4-2019 by crankyoldman because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Im telling you.
Rudy is consulting on the takedown.
He practically wrote the RICO statutes



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:50 PM
link   
Here you go Rel...


Think you know Quantum? DARPA is taking proposals for ONISQ. Aims to establish that Quantum Information Processing using Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum devices has quantitative advantage for solving combinatorial optimization problems over best classical methods.
Optimization with Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum devices (ONISQ)



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: dashen

PM for you, D.



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 05:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: crankyoldman

Im telling you.
Rudy is consulting on the takedown.
He practically wrote the RICO statutes


Both ways. How DJT can company can avoid, and how they can use - every angle covered. He's good on teeeeveeee too.

Dash said: "I don't know about you but I'm seriously questioning the validity of our reality"

Now? The same folks that force fed the planetary population The KarDASHians also force fed half a million articles in two damn years on non existent "collusion." Now you question, now I say?



posted on Apr, 10 2019 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Sp pretty much exactly what Q, and we have been saying all along? Brian Cates acts like he came up with all of this all by his lonesome....how cute.


Brian Cates been following me and other for over a year on twitter
Be carefully off the silent one their BOOM are lounder



new topics

top topics



 
118
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join