It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Court Ruling Implies That Barr Must Redact Grand-Jury Info from Mueller Report

page: 2
45
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 06:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Rewey




They were so embarrassed by the outcome of the report,


LOL what?
Do you have the report to know what it says? Another chicken counter? Counting eggs instead of chicks?




posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 06:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra




Its up there with House Dems trying to obtain Trumps tax info by using an obscure section of IRS law that has absolutely no legal basis / application to how its trying to be used.



Yeah ...


no



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 06:57 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 07:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

This isn't new. Mueller already supplied them with summaries that protected everybody.

And Democrats don't care about the law.


Nadler says Congress "entitled to see all" of Mueller report, vows court fight for grand jury testimony

www.cbsnews.com...



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 04:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra




Its up there with House Dems trying to obtain Trumps tax info by using an obscure section of IRS law that has absolutely no legal basis / application to how its trying to be used.



Yeah ...


no


No is exactly right. Congress will not get his tax info. The law being referred to requires a legislative purpose. There is no legislative purpose for his records,

Congress will also not get the complete unredacted Mueller report.
edit on 8-4-2019 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
Did anyone really expect to see the entire report? By the time grifters like Barr get done with it it'll be more blacked out than Kavanaugh on a school night.

Ahahahaha
Perhaps they should have paid attention to the rules prior to the rush to appoint a special council.
That or they thought Rosenstein would get to do the aforementioned blacking out.

rubes



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Boadicea

It means he cant reveal any testimony given to the grand jury. It is always protected.

that is rich coming from the "give it to me dirty" lady
did you finally read the rules?

edit on 8/4/2019 by shooterbrody because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 05:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

The state of ny is now going to change their state law so they can get his state returns.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...



Democratic lawmakers in New York are trying to amend state law to obtain President Trump’s tax returns.



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Xcathdra

The state of ny is now going to change their state law so they can get his state returns.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...



Democratic lawmakers in New York are trying to amend state law to obtain President Trump’s tax returns.




Blatant harassment there. Id take that to the supreme court or say presidential privlidge and seal all my documents since Fed law trumps state law.



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Xcathdra

And precisely, what kind of information do you think they'll have to redact?

Asking because I really wanted to see the full report with names and possible incoming indictments. I mean, there must be the names of the perpetrators of the biggest political hoax ever made, amirite?



Mueller said there are NO incoming indictments...Regardless of the grand jury indictments, there have been NO indictments for anyone colluding with Russia...There's nothing to see...

You guys are hoping some crumbs will drop that might embarrass Trump...The witch hunt is over...



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 09:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Rewey




They were so embarrassed by the outcome of the report,


LOL what?
Do you have the report to know what it says? Another chicken counter? Counting eggs instead of chicks?


The report has been submitted and there is nothing in it.

MSNBC has moved on to trump has too many "acting" members on his cabinet that the Senate has not confirmed.

I am well aware that you will not admit when you were wrong just like they will not. At least they have changed the subject. I know Trump is still bad but do try to keep up with the weekly reasons why that they feed you.

Lol



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 04:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Xcathdra

The state of ny is now going to change their state law so they can get his state returns.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...



Democratic lawmakers in New York are trying to amend state law to obtain President Trump’s tax returns.




Privacy laws are, again, going to undermine what Democrats are trying to do.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Xcathdra

The state of ny is now going to change their state law so they can get his state returns.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...



Democratic lawmakers in New York are trying to amend state law to obtain President Trump’s tax returns.




Blatant harassment there. Id take that to the supreme court or say presidential privlidge and seal all my documents since Fed law trumps state law.

Disgusting how Democrats are willing to destroy personal right and privacy while the rabid left cheers on their destruction.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra




Its up there with House Dems trying to obtain Trumps tax info by using an obscure section of IRS law that has absolutely no legal basis / application to how its trying to be used.



Yeah ...


no


No is exactly right. Congress will not get his tax info. The law being referred to requires a legislative purpose. There is no legislative purpose for his records,

Congress will also not get the complete unredacted Mueller report.

I said the exact same thing multiple times, they refuse to acknowledge the legislative purpose part.




top topics



 
45
<< 1   >>

log in

join