It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Right so you admit trump has listened to advice and is now recomending a barrier or wall or fence or whatever you want to call it that is exactly like the current one.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
So your point is what? Trump old proposal of what the wall should be was bad? Does that justify keeping the gov shutdown over the current proposal?
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
So your point is what? Trump old proposal of what the wall should be was bad? Does that justify keeping the gov shutdown over the current proposal?
And by the way, he never had an old proposal.
Can you direct me to the specifics? Studies and explanations by border officials where and what would be built? Vendors? Materials? Costs?
He just barked "Wall" and asked for 5 Billion Dollars.
That is of course after yelling for over a year that Mexico was going to pay for it.
It would be the first time in history Congress wrote a 5 Billion Dollar check of taxpayer money based on someone saying the word "wall", or is it "see through wall" now?
Such insanity.
Nope. Never. The President can make a legitimate, detailed plan on what, where, why and how the 5 Billion Dollars will be spent, just like every other spending request in congress.
The notion that in his private business he would ever write someone a check for 5 Billion without even being sure of what is going to be built is ludicrous.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Right.
SO you have no explanation for how the barrier that trump is proposing now would be called immoral by dem leadership,
but they voted for a very similar barrier in the past.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
What is the dem proposal exactly again?
Customs and Border Protection. The bill provides $14.256 billion for Customs and Border Protection, $239 million more than fiscal year 2018 and $31 million more than the fiscal year 2019 request.
The bill includes funds to support the hiring of 375 new CBP officers for deployment to our air and land ports of entry and 375 new Border Patrol agents (instead of the 750 requested by the President).
In addition, $35 million is provided to relocate and retain existing agents, especially in remote locations.
A greater emphasis has also been placed on reliable and proven border solutions and funds critical investments in technologies and assets, including:
$98.6 million for countering opioids.
$174 million for non-intrusive inspection equipment at our ports.
$86 million for 3 additional multi-role enforcement aircraft to continue addressing aviation needs.
$14.5 million for integrated coastal interceptor vessels for patrolling our maritime borders.
$43.7 million for remote video surveillance systems.
$4 million for mobile surveillance capability.
$60 million for replacement vehicles.
$8.2 million to continue deploying new border technology including funds to address the cross-border tunnel threat.
This bill includes $1.6 billion for approximately 65 miles of pedestrian fencing in the Rio Grande Valley. The bill limits funds in the bill to currently deployed fencing design along the southern border, such as bollard fencing. The bill includes a prohibition on building any barrier in the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge and requires a comprehensive risk-based border security plan no later than 180 days after enactment.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. $7.210 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, $135 million more than fiscal year 2018, and $1.081 billion less than the fiscal year 2019 request. Funds in the bill ensure compliance with U.S. immigration laws while streamlining and facilitating the legal immigration process. Funds are continued to strongly support investigations into stopping human trafficking and smuggling, as well as efforts to prevent child sex tourism through funding of International Meagan’s Law.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Again, you avoid the point pelosi says no money will be given because trumps proposal is immoral. She is not saying she doesnt know the details, she is saying its immoral.
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Again, you avoid the point pelosi says no money will be given because trumps proposal is immoral. She is not saying she doesnt know the details, she is saying its immoral.
You would like me to explain or defend Nancy Pelosi's choice of adjectives when she speaks?
Maybe you are too entrenched in team politics to understand how odd a request that is.
I speak for myself, not my responsibility to own, explain or defend a strangers words.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: Extorris
If 2/3 of the House and Senate can pass this bill...they can override a President's veto. So why did they not do this?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Again, you avoid the point pelosi says no money will be given because trumps proposal is immoral. She is not saying she doesnt know the details, she is saying its immoral.
You would like me to explain or defend Nancy Pelosi's choice of adjectives when she speaks?
Maybe you are too entrenched in team politics to understand how odd a request that is.
I speak for myself, not my responsibility to own, explain or defend a strangers words.
The thread is about Cuomo showing why dem leadership like pelosi are in the wrong for their stance the wall is immoral, and how this proves they are the ones responsible for the bshutdown.
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Again, you avoid the point pelosi says no money will be given because trumps proposal is immoral. She is not saying she doesnt know the details, she is saying its immoral.
You would like me to explain or defend Nancy Pelosi's choice of adjectives when she speaks?
Maybe you are too entrenched in team politics to understand how odd a request that is.
I speak for myself, not my responsibility to own, explain or defend a strangers words.
The thread is about Cuomo showing why dem leadership like pelosi are in the wrong for their stance the wall is immoral, and how this proves they are the ones responsible for the bshutdown.
A) Trump proudly owns the Shut-Down.
B) I like you inadvertent mash-up of BS and Shutdown I think that is how it should be referred to from now on.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Again, you avoid the point pelosi says no money will be given because trumps proposal is immoral. She is not saying she doesnt know the details, she is saying its immoral.
You would like me to explain or defend Nancy Pelosi's choice of adjectives when she speaks?
Maybe you are too entrenched in team politics to understand how odd a request that is.
I speak for myself, not my responsibility to own, explain or defend a strangers words.
The thread is about Cuomo showing why dem leadership like pelosi are in the wrong for their stance the wall is immoral, and how this proves they are the ones responsible for the bshutdown.
A) Trump proudly owns the Shut-Down.
B) I like you inadvertent mash-up of BS and Shutdown I think that is how it should be referred to from now on.
A) regardless of what trumps says, we see dems calling the same type of wall they voted for in the past
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris
Again, you avoid the point pelosi says no money will be given because trumps proposal is immoral. She is not saying she doesnt know the details, she is saying its immoral.
You would like me to explain or defend Nancy Pelosi's choice of adjectives when she speaks?
Maybe you are too entrenched in team politics to understand how odd a request that is.
I speak for myself, not my responsibility to own, explain or defend a strangers words.
The thread is about Cuomo showing why dem leadership like pelosi are in the wrong for their stance the wall is immoral, and how this proves they are the ones responsible for the bshutdown.
A) Trump proudly owns the Shut-Down.
B) I like you inadvertent mash-up of BS and Shutdown I think that is how it should be referred to from now on.
A) regardless of what trumps says, we see dems calling the same type of wall they voted for in the past
Steel Slat Fencing.
they never voted to build a "wall"
Where’s wall, though?
The border wall has been a consistent Trump theme since he kicked off his presidential bid in June 2015, but Trump has not been consistent on key details, like how long the wall would be, what it would look like and what it would cost.
After suggesting the whole, 2,000-mile border might be walled, Trump said he’d build a 1,000-mile wall along the southern border. Since, he has scaled the length of the barrier down to “700 or 900” miles.
Beyond that, he has said the wall would cost $4 billion; he’s also said it could cost $20 billion, a figure reportedly in line with internal estimates from the Department of Homeland Security.
Trump has said the wall could be 35 feet tall, or 45 feet tall, or higher, and he’s given several different ways Mexico could pay for it, all of which have been soundly rejected by Mexico.
What is known: the wall would cover some stretch of border between the U.S. and Mexico, and it could include constructing new barriers and also improving existing barriers. Fixing existing walls is something the administration has found money to do, fueling Trump claims that the wall is being built already.
About 650 miles of the border — particularly around what once were high-volume crossing areas in California — already have some wall or fence, but only 300 miles of fencing is designed to stop the movement of people, according to a USA Today investigation.
Many of the roughly 1,350 miles of unfenced border are in remote areas with unforgiving geographical features, which even Trump has said makes a wall unnecessary in those areas.