It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is the NYT op-ed Sedition and Treason

page: 4
19
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Again, I’m not aware of the legalities.


If that's the case how can you say he's flirting with treason? Treason is a legal offense.


Because I’m not a lawyer. Neither are you guys.


It's the highest crime of our country, very few people have been charged and convicted.

This person wrote an OP-ED, they said they were trying to block the president on a few key items without detailing how.

We don't know who the person is, none of this is verified.

How could you say they are flirting with treason? For all we know the alleged group of people trying to stop Trump from a couple of issues are using strong words to stop him. Woopdy effing doo, people do that with their boss on the daily across the world.


I’m not making the case he is guilty of treason despite your claims. Someone will, however.


If you're so confident, go make your bet Here, You'll need to lay down 200 dollars to win 100 that if the person is revealed, Trump will try and have treason charges brought up. Sounds like a sure thing, but it's a trap, take it from a better.

You're welcome to it though, put you're money where your mouth is.




posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: NiNjABackflip

You tossed the softballs, the rest are hitting them out of the park, and now you want me to take you to dinner and a show?


You guys are playing t-ball. You have to misrepresent your opponent to hit anything past second base.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy





This says Mueller has nothing on Trump so they will attack him from a different angle


Boy that's a stretch. I don't even see how these two things are related and you see vindication.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Again, I’m not aware of the legalities.


If that's the case how can you say he's flirting with treason? Treason is a legal offense.


Because I’m not a lawyer. Neither are you guys.


It's the highest crime of our country, very few people have been charged and convicted.

This person wrote an OP-ED, they said they were trying to block the president on a few key items without detailing how.

We don't know who the person is, none of this is verified.

How could you say they are flirting with treason? For all we know the alleged group of people trying to stop Trump from a couple of issues are using strong words to stop him. Woopdy effing doo, people do that with their boss on the daily across the world.


I’m not making the case he is guilty of treason despite your claims. Someone will, however.


If you're so confident, go make your bet Here, You'll need to lay down 200 dollars to win 100 that if the person is revealed, Trump will try and have treason charges brought up. Sounds like a sure thing, but it's a trap, take it from a better.

You're welcome to it though, put you're money where your mouth is.


Again, I am not making the case for treason. No need to continue the lie.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You are making stuff up. You said I was speaking of “illegalities” (I wasn’t), you claimed I said subverting the duly elected president is illegal (I didn’t), and you thought that when I was criticizing the writers behavior I was talking about his anonymous writing, and not to what he admitted to in it. Sorry, but this is just to much fakery to contend with.

You called an action treasonous. Treason is illegal. It's simple substitution logic. How are you having trouble following that logic?

You are splitting hairs over silliness right now because you can't admit that you were wrong.


You’re the one splitting hairs. Despite your fake claims, I am not making the case for treason.


Man. These sure LOOK like your words.

He is definitely playing with treason, he is definitely engaging in propaganda, and just admitted to subverting the same institutions of democracy he tried to blame Trump for destroying. It’s embarrassing.

The post even attributes these words to your username. Did someone else sit in your chair and type them then?
edit on 6-9-2018 by Krazysh0t because: quoted wrong post originally.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: NiNjABackflip




You’re the one splitting hairs. Despite your fake claims, I am not making the case for treason.


Then what are you calling for? The repeal of the 1st amendment?



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

What crimes?



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Q


Need I say anything more?



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: NiNjABackflip

You tossed the softballs, the rest are hitting them out of the park, and now you want me to take you to dinner and a show?


You guys are playing t-ball. You have to misrepresent your opponent to hit anything past second base.


Who are we misrepresenting?

The thread title is "Is the NYT op-ed Sedition and Treason".

You said frankly that they are flirting with treason.

We saying no to both.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: NiNjABackflip




You’re the one splitting hairs. Despite your fake claims, I am not making the case for treason.


Then what are you calling for? The repeal of the 1st amendment?


I’m calling that you properly engage in my arguments instead of mistruing them to serve your own ends.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Again, I’m not aware of the legalities.


If that's the case how can you say he's flirting with treason? Treason is a legal offense.


Because I’m not a lawyer. Neither are you guys.


It's the highest crime of our country, very few people have been charged and convicted.

This person wrote an OP-ED, they said they were trying to block the president on a few key items without detailing how.

We don't know who the person is, none of this is verified.

How could you say they are flirting with treason? For all we know the alleged group of people trying to stop Trump from a couple of issues are using strong words to stop him. Woopdy effing doo, people do that with their boss on the daily across the world.


I’m not making the case he is guilty of treason despite your claims. Someone will, however.


If you're so confident, go make your bet Here, You'll need to lay down 200 dollars to win 100 that if the person is revealed, Trump will try and have treason charges brought up. Sounds like a sure thing, but it's a trap, take it from a better.

You're welcome to it though, put you're money where your mouth is.


Again, I am not making the case for treason. No need to continue the lie.


Previously...


originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
He is definitely playing with treason...


Well I'm confused by your logic(?).



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:23 AM
link   
a reply to: NthOther

The Times does not publish anonymous OP ed pieces. They did not do so this time either. They know this person and they know the position he holds.
They just aren't telling us. They thought the information was important enough to break their own rule and not reveal who wrote this.
The appeal at the end sounds like a seasoned politician. Like Dan Coats.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: NiNjABackflip

You tossed the softballs, the rest are hitting them out of the park, and now you want me to take you to dinner and a show?


You guys are playing t-ball. You have to misrepresent your opponent to hit anything past second base.


Who are we misrepresenting?

The thread title is "Is the NYT op-ed Sedition and Treason".

You said frankly that they are flirting with treason.

We saying no to both.


You dismissed the entirety of my argument to focus on a minor point, or worse, maybe followed everyone else in doing the same.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: NiNjABackflip




I’m calling that you properly engage in my arguments instead of mistruing them to serve your own ends.


I believe that has been done conclusively, and that you have no more arguments.

Would you like to restate them, now that "treason" and "sedition" are pretty much wrapped up?
edit on 6-9-2018 by JasonBillung because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Well they would because that would be total lies.
This on the other hand will probably boost sales even more.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: NiNjABackflip

You know, if you want us to move on you could EASILY just say that you were wrong about the treason point and then rebring up your other points you'd like us to address that you are accusing us of ignoring right now.
edit on 6-9-2018 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: NiNjABackflip

You tossed the softballs, the rest are hitting them out of the park, and now you want me to take you to dinner and a show?


You guys are playing t-ball. You have to misrepresent your opponent to hit anything past second base.


Who are we misrepresenting?

The thread title is "Is the NYT op-ed Sedition and Treason".

You said frankly that they are flirting with treason.

We saying no to both.


You dismissed the entirety of my argument to focus on a minor point, or worse, maybe followed everyone else in doing the same.


I think you changed your point.

As for following other people, I am capable of thinking on my own, I take positions on issues. I'm beholden to no politician/party/ideology. My posting record speaks for it self on that one. I've been called a Trumper, concervative, liberal, and socialist. But the answer is none of the above, I'm and individualist.
edit on 6-9-2018 by CriticalStinker because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:33 AM
link   
a reply to: NiNjABackflip

What did he admit to?



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: roadgravel

Which is what this insider resistance crowd is trying to do. Keep the crazy man on the right side of the law but with Alzheimer's advancing it may simply be getting too hard to do.
Hence the advanced warning to the public that this option is on the table.
Where is McConnell and Ryan this morning?
Awful quiet from the leadership no?



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: NiNjABackflip

You tossed the softballs, the rest are hitting them out of the park, and now you want me to take you to dinner and a show?


You guys are playing t-ball. You have to misrepresent your opponent to hit anything past second base.


Who are we misrepresenting?

The thread title is "Is the NYT op-ed Sedition and Treason".

You said frankly that they are flirting with treason.

We saying no to both.


You dismissed the entirety of my argument to focus on a minor point, or worse, maybe followed everyone else in doing the same.


I think you changed your point.

As for following other people, I am capable of thinking on my own, I take positions on issues. I'm beholden to no politician/party/ideology. My posting record speaks for it self on that one. I've been called a Trumper, concervative, liberal, and socialist. But the answer is none of the above, I'm and individualist.


I don't really care about any of all that. I clarified my position.




top topics



 
19
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join