UFO _ Archaeology : Paris

So this next one is a classic. I know.

But i sure would like to see the "official" debunk reason.. Link, explanation. ( not just.. Yeah.. its debunked dude )

I, for one , think this could be an ectual observation of Tesla like force fields and field location transportation.



Any takes?

a reply to: EartOccupant


Gotta call bogus on that one man, looks extremely faked. Typical faked ufo video, in and out of focus and in and out of frame.

a reply to: norhoc

I get you.
I counter..
1. It is one of the first. Before the CGI hype
2. Being possible to fake, does not make it fake.

67. I have a vid, what do you have?

originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: EartOccupant


Gotta call bogus on that one man, looks extremely faked. Typical faked ufo video, in and out of focus and in and out of frame.

It doesn't look faked at all, it sure feels fake though.

What makes you say it looks fake?

a reply to: EartOccupant


watch Men In Black there is a video of aliens and space ships, that doesn't make it real.

a reply to: norhoc

I agree.

What does it have to do with my topic?

Unless you have some substantial evidence about the connection between Hollywood and my clip.

a reply to: EartOccupant


You claim your proof is the video and I am saying not all videos are real

a reply to: norhoc

I don't claim proof and i don't dispute your claim.

a reply to: EartOccupant

It's fake.

It's fake because the "craft" has two vertical stabilisers on it. Why would something that can float about and de-materialise have vertical stabilisers. Because the designer is thinking about normal aircraft, not unimaginable technology, and also to make it look a bit cooler.

At 0:43 it has two sloped wing tails. So that makes me think it is a stealth fighter/bomber. The minimum speed was kept classified, but I guess that meant it could hover. There were UFO reports of black triangles hovering above cars and roasting them with an energy weapon that made paintwork melt and skin burn.

But the craft in this video is extremely flat. 3DMax and motion tracking have been available for over two decades now. So I would say CGI.

I have gone back to 2009, furthest I have found.



I am sure this was reported in 2006-7 or even before, but I can not find anything from there.

a reply to: myselfaswell

Good observations..

I counter with:

1. Hybrid design
2. Camouflage
3. All of the above

a reply to: EartOccupant

I have no idea if that is real or not, but I think a lot of what people see as UFOs (that haven't been debunked as lens flare, hoaxes, etc.) are actually military projects that wont become public for at least 20-30 years.. if ever!

a reply to: Jonjonj

Exactly, the time of VIDEO recorders with descent night vision.

And reported it was... But I never have seen a descent debunk.


( Note: It might be in the wrong forum and should be in weaponry )

It looks very much like the Belgium triangle pictures. The best speculation is that they are ours. There's no need to invoke aliens here--just an advanced craft that has been deployed for many years now. Just google triangle UFO and there is a ton of information out there. Look here. The picture looks exactly the same.

a reply to: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk

Yup, thats an option for sure, see my above post.

But that also why I revive this. People who did laugh abouth this vid years ago.. might have come to different conclusions , observations...or Insights.

a reply to: schuyler

I agree, aliens are the most unlikely explanation.

Was not sure either if it would stick in aviation or weaponry.

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Jonjonj

Exactly, the time of VIDEO recorders with descent night vision.

And reported it was... But I never have seen a descent debunk.


( Note: It might be in the wrong forum and should be in weaponry )

I agree. Although it seems to me to be absolutely fake, there is, in fact, no evidence of even any debunking, or if there is I have not seen it. It basically was just shrugged off, as if "nothing to see here" was applied.

a reply to: Jonjonj


For me, personally, this is one of the most convincing vids of a probably terrestrial black op craft ever.
Astro comes into mind... Harvesting brain power.

But then again.. I could be wrong.

a reply to: EartOccupant

To me it looks like CGI, not because of the "UFO" but because of the camera movement. Look at videos made with hand-held cameras and you will see that the movements are more abrupt and shorter, the camera shakes, doesn't "float" like in the fake videos.

But this is just my opinion.