It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

page: 60
66
<< 57  58  59    61 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

Is Peter Strzok a porn star?




posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Spiramirabilis

She showed the boys her boobies. Tee hee giggle giggle.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Spiramirabilis

Unfortunately one of those books is going to be a history book.
This generation owns this disaster and shame like 1940s Germany did theirs.
SAD!



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


That's from Donald trumps book. Lol

Well, you're certainly living it. Didn't realize you were a fan.

Never apologize... never seen you apologize for anything, even when you've been proven wrong.
Never take blame.... same as above.
Never admit a wrong... never seen you do that either.
Find an enemy and blame them for everything... you picked Trump.
Slander and lie about that enemy.... and you're doing a very good job of that!

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Spiramirabilis


You capitalize porn star like that means something

:-)

It does. It means she's one step above a hooker... well, not really. She gets paid to have sex on camera.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


Is Peter Strzok a porn star?

Ask Lisa Page.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


She showed the boys her boobies. Tee hee giggle giggle.

She showed a lot more than that.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 01:26 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck



It does. It means she's one step above a hooker... well, not really. She gets paid to have sex on camera.

TheRedneck


What have you got against hookers? What have you got against sex?

Anyhow, Jesus liked them fine. He accepted everyone - including the poor, criminals, lepers. Asylum seekers. Christ - he'd probably even accept Trump. So, who are you to judge? :-)

Just saying Redneck - you want to lump people into categories of credible, worthy - and unworthy. You elitist you

Again - we're so off topic I expect a slap. Start that thread. Seems like you have something you need to get off your chest


edit on 7/15/2018 by Spiramirabilis because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Spiramirabilis


What have you got against hookers? What have you got against sex?

Nothing. I just don't consider them honest and trustworthy.


Anyhow, Jesus liked them fine. He accepted everyone - including the poor, criminals, lepers. Asylum seekers. Christ - he'd probably even accept Trump. So, who are you to judge? :-)

Yes, Jesus accepted everyone... with the commandment "Go and sin no more." I find it interesting how that part is left out. I know of not one verse in the Bible that shows Jesus accepting sin... only the sinner.

And in that vein, I do not judge Stormy Daniels' soul... that is for God to judge. I judge her actions and act accordingly.

As should you.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 02:16 PM
link   
Anyone else know how a MOD has purposefully and completely derailed this thread?

Apparently in a non-mudpit forum that is allowed these days.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sillyolme


Is Peter Strzok a porn star?

Ask Lisa Page.

TheRedneck

Also ask Strzok's wife and Lisa's husband what they think of 'Pistol Pete' Strzok.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

No, but I know several members who have.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Love a girl who's not afraid to hit.
Knows how to throw a punch.
Go stormy.


She attacked her spouse.
Police report lists HIM as the "VICTIM".

So you support domestic violence.
Enjoy your hero.



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck




I judge her actions and act accordingly.


What are her actions - and how do they make her unreliable or affect her credibility? Do you actually believe that being on film doing things you don't like makes her dishonest? I'd love a serious explanation of how that works out in your head


As should you.


I should judge her? No - I don't think so. Not based on something arbitrary. You think she's unworthy - that's on you. It has nothing to do with me

You should mind your own house Redneck :-)


edit on 7/15/2018 by Spiramirabilis because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

Stop with the personal comments.
You don't know anything about how I live my life nor is my life your business.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
edit on 7152018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)

edit on 7152018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 02:50 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 03:15 PM
link   

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!


All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)


ALSO....please stay on topic.
Lot os things being discussed here, and too many are not the focus of the OP!



You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Spiramirabilis


What are her actions - and how do they make her unreliable or affect her credibility? Do you actually believe that being on film doing things you don't like makes her dishonest? I'd love a serious explanation of how that works out in your head

Very well, as much as I can do within the restrictions here.

I have nothing against porn, whatsoever. I am, however, intelligent enough to understand that those who produce the films are not what they appear. They are not actors. They are exhibits. More times than not, such a life leads to other things, such as promiscuity and pushing the limits of the law. That's simply the nature of the beast. Stormy's arrest did not surprise me in the least, as such antics are common among those in her profession.

Now, if she can break out of that lifestyle, more power to her. That would improve my impression of her, as she showed initiative and ambition. I know of several people in the public eye who had their moments in the sex trade, but they were able to escape that trap and thus I ignore that part of their past. She has not, however, broken out of that lifestyle; instead, she has hired a very shady attorney who himself is under investigation for several bad deeds, and chosen to violate the terms of a non-disclosure agreement she was well paid to execute. In essence, while I consider demanding payment over an affair as extortion, then going back on the agreement is pure theft. She took money for something she had no intention of doing. Her word is worthless. She was just arrested during a strip show for improper conduct, showing me that she also has no respect for the law.

I have even checked out some of her 'work'... mediocre at best IMO.

That is why I disparage Stormy Daniels: her poor character. Her choice of venue is simply an indicator of that poor character and she has since becoming infamous showed that it is a good indicator.


I should judge her? No - I don't think so. Not based on something arbitrary. You think she's unworthy - that's on you. It has nothing to do with me

No, you should be more careful who you hitch your wagon to. Daniels is not a rising star... she is a falling chunk of rock. You should try to see the difference.

But, as you say, that is your business. That's the only realistic thing I have seen you post in this thread thus far.


You should mind your own house Redneck :-)

I do. Part of that is minding who I do and do not look up to. If one lies down with dogs, one tends to get up with fleas.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

I have nothing against porn, whatsoever

You say this with a straight face?
And then:


That is why I disparage Stormy Daniels: her poor character. Her choice of venue is simply an indicator of that poor character and she has since becoming infamous showed that it is a good indicator.

I seriously wish this was happening in another thread :-)


No, you should be more careful who you hitch your wagon to. Daniels is not a rising star... she is a falling chunk of rock. You should try to see the difference.

I'll worry about my honor Redneck and where I hitch my wagon - I'll leave you to judge people however you see fit

You don't seem to be very objective . I'm mostly interested in this idea you have that you can detect dishonesty in a person based on where people fall on your naughtiness meter. Ms Daniels is a dirty girl - low class - making movies you seem to like in an industry you support. So, because of this - she is automatically a liar?


I do. Part of that is minding who I do and do not look up to. If one lies down with dogs, one tends to get up with fleas.

Well, since you just watch the dogs, I guess that lets you off the hook?
You can't help but preach and judge. Ms. Daniels may not be your cup of tea. Let's just leave it at that

Let's get back to talking about Mr. Strzok - who as far as we both know has not hitched his wagon to Ms. Daniels. Is his character more to your liking?

P.S. Redneck - there's more in your post I'd like to address - but this really isn't the place for it. If you don't start a new thread - I just might. But, not tonight :-)
edit on 7/15/2018 by Spiramirabilis because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 08:21 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

I was mistaken on this initially, it was not Gaetz, it was Collins who was questioning Strzok on being read out of a SCI when he was found to be out of scope.

Here is the clip from that point on. Notice how Strzok stammers and stumbles in his answer to this question. His coaching (he was obviously coached on much of what he would face in this hearing, especially from the democrats who were reading from their scripts directly in many cases) did not cover this aspect of potential questioning, I think.




top topics



 
66
<< 57  58  59    61 >>

log in

join